#P147 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyExpression of an Inwardly-Rectifying Potassium Channel(ROMK) in Mouse Glial-like Taste CellsGennady Dvoryanchikov 1 , Michael Sinclair 2 , Nirupa Chaudhari 1,21Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of MiamiMiller School of Medicine Miami, FL, USA, 2 Program inNeurosciences, University of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiami, FL, USACells in taste buds are closely packed with little extracellularspace. Tight junctions and other barriers further limitpermeability and may result in the buildup of K + during actionpotentials. In many tissues, inwardly-rectifying K channels suchas the Renal Outer Medullary K (ROMK) channel help toredistribute K + . ROMK is an inwardly rectifying ATP-sensitiveK channel, derived from the kir1.1 (kcnj1) gene. Using RT-PCR,we defined several splice variants of ROMK in mouse kidney, andreport here the expression of a single one of these splice variants,ROMK2, in a subset of mouse taste cells. Using qRT-PCR, wefound ROMK2 mRNA is expressed in taste buds in the followingorder of abundance: vallate > foliate >> palate >> fungi<strong>for</strong>m.Immunocytochemistry revealed that the ROMK protein followsthe same pattern as mRNA, and is essentially undetectable infungi<strong>for</strong>m taste buds. ROMK is localized to the apical tips of asubset of taste cells (~8.5+/-2.5 cells/vallate tastebud). Usingtissues from PLCb2-GFP and GAD-GFP transgenic mice, weshow that ROMK is not expressed in PLC 2-expressing typeII/Receptor cells or in GAD-expressing type III/Presynaptic cells.Thus, immunocytochemical data suggest that ROMK expressionis limited to a subset of glial-like type I cells. Single-cell RT-PCRconfirms this interpretation: ROMK2 mRNA was detected in23% of NTPDase2-expressing cells, but not in either PLCb2- orSNAP25-expressing taste cells. We propose that in taste buds,ROMK in supporting type I cells may serve a homeostaticfunction, excreting excess K + through the apical pore, andallowing excitable taste cells (types II and III) to maintain ahyperpolarized resting membrane potential.#P148 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyCortical Processing of Learned Aversive Odors in Awake RatsChien-Fu F Chen 1,3 , Donald A Wilson 1,21Nathan Kline Institute Orangeburg, NY, USA, 2 NYU School ofMedicine New York, NY, USA, 3 The University of OklahomaNorman, OK, USAMost naturally occurring odors are complex mixtures. Thesemixtures are hypothesized to be synthesized into odor objectsthrough activity of olfactory cortical circuits. Work inanesthetized rats has demonstrated that neurons in the anteriorpiri<strong>for</strong>m cortex discriminate between mixtures and theirindividual components. Furthermore, it has been shown thatcortical odor processing is experience-dependent, with familiarityleading to enhanced discriminability of odorants. However, thereis still limited data on cortical processing of odors in awakeanimals. The present experiment had two primary goals. First,compare activity of neurons in the anterior piri<strong>for</strong>m cortex ofawake rats to those in anesthetized rats in response to complexmixtures and second, examine how aversive conditioning canaffect that processing. Long-Evans rats were chronicallyimplanted with movable wire bundles aimed at the anteriorpiri<strong>for</strong>m cortex. Responses of single-units to individual odorantsand mixtures were tested. Odors were randomly presented fromthe top of the recording chamber to mimic natural odor plumes.Following several days of recording, one odor was chosen as theconditioning odor in an odor aversion conditioningparadigm. Unit data was recorded during the conditioning trialsand <strong>for</strong> several days post-training. The electrode was moved overtime to sample additional cells. Preliminary results (n = 148 units)suggest that 35% of the units responded to any one odor or odormixture, which is comparable to response rates in anesthetizedrats. Individual cells showed excellent discrimination of odors,including mixtures overlapping by as much as 90%. Finally, odoraversion appeared to enhance selectivity of anterior piri<strong>for</strong>mcortex neuron ensembles, potentially enhancing thediscriminability of learned aversive odors.#P149 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyStrategy <strong>for</strong> recombinant expression of functionalN-terminal domain of human T1R3 taste receptorproduced in Escherichia coliElodie Maîtrepierre, Maud Sigoillot, Loïc BriandUMR 1129 INRA-ENESAD-UB FLAVIC Dijon, FranceThe sweet taste receptor is a heterodimer composed of twosubunits called T1R2 and T1R3. Each subunit belongs to the classC of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and is constituted bya large extracellular N-terminal domain (NTD) linked to thetransmembrane domain by a cystein-rich region. T1R2 and T1R3NTDs are both able to bind natural sugars and some sweeteners(sucralose) with distinct affinities and undergo ligand-dependentcon<strong>for</strong>mational change. However, the relative contribution of thetwo subunits to the heterodimeric receptor function remainslargely unknown. To study the binding specificity of each subunitusing biochemical and structural approaches, a large amount ofpurified NTDs is suitable. Here, we report the production offunctional human T1R3 NTD from insoluble aggregated protein(inclusion bodies) expressed in high level in Escherichia coli.Transferring this protein into its native state by in vitro refoldingrequires screening to find buffer conditions and suitable additives.We established a factorial screen to detect folded functional T1R3NTD based on intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence quenching bysucralose. From the screen, we successively identified positivesynergistic interactions between additives on refolding of T1R3NTD. The soluble protein was then purified and characterized.Fluorescence and circular dichroism spectroscopy demonstratedthat T1R3 NTD is properly refolded and able to bind saccharidecompounds with physiological relevant affinities. To furthervalidate our expression strategy, we introduced single amino acidchanges in the predicted binding site using site-directedmutagenesis. The described production procedure in highquantity should be useful to per<strong>for</strong>m structural and functionalstudies of human T1R3 and other T1R ligand-binding domains.P O S T E R S<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 73
#P150 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyIdentifying TRPA1 agonists by monitoring intracellularcalcium levels in HEK cellsPaige M. Roe, Erik C. Johnson, Wayne L. SilverWake Forest University Winston-Salem, NC, USANasal trigeminal chemoreceptors appear to be stimulated byvirtually all volatile compounds if presented in highconcentrations. Trigeminal nerve endings contain several differenttypes of receptors; however, the specific receptors stimulated bymany trigeminal stimuli are unknown. Transient receptor proteins(TRPs) are non-specific cation channels, associated withtrigeminal nerve fibers, which display an affinity <strong>for</strong> calcium.TRPA1, found in a subset of neurons in the trigeminal ganglion,has at least 90 different known agonists and was considered alikely target of known trigeminal stimuli that work through anunidentified mechanism. The goal of this experiment was todetermine if certain known trigeminal stimuli activate TRPA1.Both naive HEK and hTRPA1-HEK cells were allowed to growin a 96-well plate <strong>for</strong> a minimum of 24 hours. Intracellular calciumlevels were measured by a plate reader using the Ca 2+ -sensitivefluorescent dye FLUO-3AM. Baseline fluorescence of each wellwas measured. A potential TRPA1 agonist was then added andfluorescence was measured again. The relative change influorescence elicited by the test stimuli from wells containinghTRPA1-HEK cells was compared to the relative fluorescentchange elicited from wells containing naive HEK cells. In all,11 stimuli were tested in various concentrations ranging from0.1 mM to 100 mM. Based on preliminary data analysis, allylisothiocyanate, alpha-terpineol, acetic acid, benzaldehyde,cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, and d-limonene stimulated TRPA1.It is presently unclear whether amyl acetate, cyclohexanone,nicotine or toluene did or did not stimulate TRPA1. This methodidentifies TRPA1 agonists and future studies examiningbehavioral responses will assess whether trigeminal irritationdue to these stimuli is solely mediated by TRPA1.#P151 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyIn Vitro Nematocidal Activity of TRPA1 ActiveCompounds from Perilla FrutescensAngela Bassoli 1 , Gigliola Borgonovo 1 , Sara Caimi 1 , GabriellaMorini 2 , Francesco D’ErricoSeveral food plants used in traditional cooking contain interestingbioactive compounds. We are particularly interested inchemestetic compounds, both <strong>for</strong> their use in gastronomy and <strong>for</strong>their medical and agronomical applications. Perilla frutescensBritton (Labiatae) is a native plant of eastern Asia, where it ispopular as culinary and medicinal herb named keaennip in Koreaand shiso in Japan. One of the major components of Perillaessential oil is perillaketone PK. We discovered that this moleculeis a potent activator of TRPA1 in in vitro assays on rat clonedreceptors [2]. TRP ion channels are important cellular sensorsactivated by several stimuli and involved in many aspects ofchemical sensing [3,4]. In particular TRPA1 is involved innociception and has an established role in sensing mechanisms ininsects and invertebrates. This finding suggests that PK could beresponsible of specific nematocidal activity of Perilla extracts.We isolated pure PK from the leaves and evaluated its nematocidalactivity against second-stage larvae of cystic nematode Heteroderadaverti, showing that it is characterized by a remarkablenematocidal activity. [1] Handbook of herbs and spices vol. 3,Peter K.V. Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton Boston New YorkWashington, DC 2006; [2] Bassoli A.; Borgonovo G.; Caimi S.;Scaglioni L.; Morini G.; Schiano Moriello A.; Di Marzo V.; DePetrocellis L., J. Bioorganic & Med. Chem., <strong>2009</strong>, (DOI10.1016/j.bmc.2008.12.057); [3] Clapham D.E., Nature, 2003, 426,517-524; [4] TRP ion channels in sensory trasduction and cellularsignaling cascades, Liedtke, W.B.; Heller, S. Eds., Taylor andFrancis, 2007.#P152 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyOlfactory rivalry: Competing olfactory processing betweenthe two nostrils and in the cortexWen Zhou, Denise ChenRice University Houston, TX, USAWhen two different images are presented to the two eyes, weperceive alternations between seeing one image and seeing theother. Termed binocular rivalry, this visual phenomenon wasrecognized over a century ago, and its neural mechanism has beenconsiderably studied. Here we report the discovery of alternatingolfactory percepts when two different odorants are presented tothe two nostrils. We show that both cortical and peripheral(olfactory receptor) adaptations are involved in this process. Ourdiscovery extends the perceptual rivalry to olfaction, and opensup entirely new avenues to explore the workings of the olfactorysystem and olfactory awareness.#P153 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyIs there a difference in odor processing in response toleft vs. right-sided odor stimulation?Anna M. Kleemann 1 , Jessica Albrecht 1, 2 , Veronika Schöpf 3 ,Rainer Kopietz 1 , Katrin Haegler 1 , Rebekka Zernecke 1 ,Marco Paolini 1 , Imke Eichhorn 1 , Jennifer Linn 1 , HartmutBrückmann 1 , Martin Wiesmann 1,41Department of Neuroradiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universityof Munich Munich, Germany, 2 Monell Chemical Senses CenterPhiladelphia, PA, USA, 3 MR Centre of Excellence, MedicalUniversity Vienna Vienna, Austria, 4 Department of Radiology andNeuroradiology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin Schwerin, GermanyObjectives: The results of a previous localization studydemonstrated, that humans need trigeminal perception to localizeodors. Based on these findings a functional magnetic resonanceimaging (fMRI) experiment was carried out to assess whetherthere are differences in odor processing in response to left versusright-sided odorant stimulation. Methods: We used two odors:8ppm H 2 S (hydrogen sulphide), which is known to be a pureodorant in this concentration, and 17.5% isoamyl acetate (IAA)as an olfactory-trigeminal stimulus. We tested 22 healthy subjectswith H 2 S and 24 subjects with IAA. Functional images wereacquired using a 3T MR scanner. The odorant stimulation wasper<strong>for</strong>med using an olfactometer. The experiment was carried outbased on an event-related design paradigm and the stimulus lengthwas 500 ms. After every stimulus the participants were asked to74 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>2009</strong>
- Page 3 and 4:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10:
#4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12:
small population of cells respondin
- Page 13:
higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18:
conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20:
expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21:
glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25: TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27: not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29: POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31: and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33: activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47: #P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49: #P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61: #P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63: #P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65: #P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67: luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69: #P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71: #P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73: 1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85: G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97: #P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99: educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101: #P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103: data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105: in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107: trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109: elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111: four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113: #P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115: pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117: utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119: taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121: animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123: classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125:
al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127:
#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129:
differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131:
IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133:
Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr