#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosensory Psychophysics IIMeasurements of stimulus preference vs. stimulus pleasantnessgive rise to different optimally liked concentrations of sucroseKristin J Rudenga 1 , Wambura Fobbs 1 , Dana M Small 1, 21Yale University New Haven, CT, USA, 2 John B PierceLaboratory New Haven, CT, USAThe pleasantness of a sweet taste has been described as a singlepeakedfunction that increases with intensity up to an optimallyliked concentration and then declines (Moskowitz et al. 1975 andothers). Pepino and Menella (2007) used a 2-alternative <strong>for</strong>cedchoice test (2-AFC) to show that subjects with a family history ofalcoholism prefer higher sucrose concentrations than thosewithout. The goal of the current study was to determine if the 2-AFC test identifies the same concentration of sucrose as thepsychohedonic curve (PHC). 29 healthy subjects were recruitedand their optimally liked concentration of sucrose was determinedby the 2-AFC and the PHC (conducted on separate days andcounterbalanced). The PHC was generated by asking subjects torate the intensity (using the gLMS) and pleasantness (using theVAS) of repeated presentations of 0.09, 0.18, 0.32, 0.56, and 1.00Msucrose. The 2-AFC consisted of subjects choosing their preferredsample from a pair of sucrose solutions of different strengths(selected from 0.09, 0.18, 0.32, 0.56, 0.70, and 1.00M sucrose). Thisidentifies the concentration that is preferred more than thoseimmediately weaker or stronger. We found that the 2-AFC andPHC identify different concentrations of sucrose as maximallyliked (PHC =0.70; 2-AFC =0.62; r 2 =0.096]. Moreover, theconcentration determined by 2-AFC, but not the concentrationdetermined by the PHC, was significantly correlated negativelywith a subject’s BMI and positively with alcohol use. Thissuggests that PHC and 2-AFC methods measure differentprocesses. Future work is needed to determine the nature of thedifference but an intriguing possibility is that judging pleasantnessvs. making a choice about preference represent differentdimensions of taste hedonics. Supported by RO1 DC006706.#P316 Poster session VII: Chemosensory Psychophysics IITaste damage associated with otitis mediaLinda M. Bartoshuk 1 , Frank A. Catalanotto 1 , Valerie B. Duffy 2 ,Miriam Grushka 1 , Vicki D. Mayo 1 , Monica C. Skarulis 3 ,Derek J. Snyder 1,41University of Florida Center <strong>for</strong> Smell and Taste Gainesville, FL,USA, 2 University of Connecticut Storrs, CT, USA, 3 NationalInstitutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA, 4 Yale UniversityNew Haven, CT, USAA history of otitis media (middle ear infection) is associated withenhanced liking <strong>for</strong> energy dense foods and higher body massindex (Snyder et al, 2008). Since the chorda tympani (CN VII,taste, anterior tongue) passes through the middle ear on its way tothe brain, it is vulnerable to damage from otitis media. We confirmthis damage with a dataset (N=736) of spatial taste tests done <strong>for</strong> avariety of studies. NaCl, sucrose, citric acid and quinine wereswabbed on loci innervated by the chorda tympani andglossopharyngeal (CN IX) nerves; whole mouth taste was alsotested. Two psychophysical scales were used, both designed toprovide valid comparisons across subjects/groups. The first variedfrom 0-100 where 0=no sensation and 100=the most intensesensation of any kind imaginable. For the second, 100=the mostintense sensation of any kind ever experienced. The change inlabels reflects data showing that “imaginable” offers noadvantages and can produce confusion in some subjects.Both scales showed significant losses <strong>for</strong> bitter on the anteriortongue (chorda tympani) but not the posterior tongue(glossopharyngeal). Whole mouth taste intensities were notreduced; in fact, taste intensities <strong>for</strong> some stimuli were intensified.This provides support <strong>for</strong> our hypothesis that inhibitoryconnections among taste nerve projection sites in the brain resultin release of inhibition when one nerve is damaged. Thus,paradoxically, localized taste damage can intensify whole mouthtaste. Localized taste damage can also intensify non-tastesensations like the tactile sensations evoked by high fat foods(see Catalanotto poster). We suggest that these sensory/hedonicchanges lead to the weight gain observed in individuals withhistories of otitis media.#P317 Poster session VII: Chemosensory Psychophysics IIOtitis Media and intensification of non-taste oral sensationsFrank A Catalanotto 1,2 , Eric T Broe 1 , Linda M Bartoshuk 1,2 ,Vicki D Mayo 1,2 , Derek J Snyder 1,21University of Florida College of Dentistry, Department ofCommunity Dentistry and Behavioral Science Gainesville, FL,USA, 2 Center <strong>for</strong> Smell and Taste Gainesville, FL, USAA history of otitis media (OM) is associated with enhanced liking<strong>for</strong> energy dense foods and higher body mass index (Snyder et al,2008). The chorda tympani nerve (CN VII, carries taste from theanterior tongue) passes through the middle ear on its way to thebrain; thus it is vulnerable to damage from OM. Paradoxically,localized damage can intensify whole mouth taste (see evidence atthe Bartoshuk poster) because of inhibitory connections betweentaste nerve projection sites in the brain (Catalanotto et al, 1993).Evidence also suggests that central inhibitory connections existbetween taste and oral pain leading to an association betweenintensified oral pain and OM (Bartoshuk et al, AChems 2007).Similarly, damage to the glossopharyngeal taste nerve (CN IX)has recently been associated with increased oral pain (Logan et al,2008). The present study was conducted to test another non-tasteoral sensation: tactile sensations evoked by fats. Subjects rated thethickness of 5 dairy products: nonfat milk, whole milk, half&half,heavy cream, heavy cream+oil on a scale from 0 to 100 where0=no sensation and 100=strongest sensation of any kind everexperienced. ANOVA with follow-up t-tests were conducted <strong>for</strong>subjects with no history of OM vs those with histories of OM.The 2 groups were not significantly different <strong>for</strong> nonfat milk;subjects with histories of OM rated 3 of the 4 stimuli containingfat as significantly “thicker” than did those without this history(the difference <strong>for</strong> half&half did not reach statistical significancebut was in the same direction). We suggest that oral thickness is acue <strong>for</strong> energy density; this cue is likely to be associated with foodliking through conditioning. Intensification of this cue wouldpresumably be associated with even greater food liking leading toweight gain.P O S T E R S<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 125
#P318 Poster session VII: Chemosensory Psychophysics IIOral irritation elicited by menthol and cinnamaldehyde (CA):self- and cross-desensitizationE. Carstens, Mirela Iodi Carstens, Karen ZanottoUniversity of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Davis Davis, CA, USAMenthol and CA are used in oral hygiene products <strong>for</strong> theirrefreshing sensory properties, but are irritating at higherconcentrations. We investigated if they exhibit self- and crossdesensitizationof their oral irritancy. Using a 2-alternative<strong>for</strong>ced-choice (2-AFC) paradigm, either menthol (19.2 , 28.8 mM)or CA (15.2, 30.4 mM) was briefly applied by filter paper to oneside of the dorsal tongue, with vehicle similarly applied to theother side. Following variable intervals, either menthol or CAwas applied bilaterally and subjects stated on which side theyexperienced greater irritation, followed by ratings of irritantintensity on each side using a labeled magnitudescale. Desensitization was manifest by a significant proportion ofsubjects choosing the vehicle-treated side as having strongerirritation, and assigning significantly higher ratings to that side.Menthol 19.2 mM exhibited significant self-desensitization andcross-desensitized irritation elicited by 15.2 mM CA applied 5but not 30 min later. CA 30.4 mM (but not 15.2 mM) crossdesensitizedirritation evoked by 28.8 mM menthol applied 5 and30 min later, and exhibited self-desensitization. These data areconsistent with self- and mutual cross-desensitization of mentholand CA-evoked responses of neurons in superficial layers oftrigeminal subnucleus caudalis. Using calcium imaging of culturedrat trigeminal ganglion neurons, we observed CA suppression ofmenthol-evoked responses, suggesting a peripheral site ofinteraction of these compounds on trigeminal nerve endings.#P319 Poster session VII: Chemosensory Psychophysics IIEvidence that repeated threshold testing can alter the perceivedintensity of tasteBarry Green 1,2 , Juyun Lim 31The John B. Pierce Laboratory New Haven, CT, USA,2Dept. of Surgery (Otolaryngology), Yale University School ofMedicine New Haven, CT, USA, 3 Dept. of Food Science andTechnology, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USAContext effects in taste have generally been attributed to responsebiases rather than to sensory mechanisms intrinsic to tasteperception. Here we report evidence that extensive exposure tothreshold-level tastes appears to heighten the perception ofsuprathreshold tastes. We discovered the effect in a study ofindividual differences in threshold and suprathreshold sensitivityto sucrose and NaCl that involved measurement of 6, 2AFCdetection thresholds over 3 sessions, followed by a 4 th session inwhich intensity ratings were obtained <strong>for</strong> 12 suprathresholdstimuli using the gLMS. Under these conditions intensity ratingswere 2-3 times higher than in a preceding experiment thatincluded some of the same stimuli but no detection task. Analysisof data from 7 Ss who participated in both experiments confirmedthe differences were statistically significant (p
- Page 3 and 4:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10:
#4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12:
small population of cells respondin
- Page 13:
higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18:
conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20:
expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21:
glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25:
TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27:
not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29:
POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31:
and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33:
activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35:
the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37:
including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39:
and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41:
75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43:
on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45:
#P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47:
#P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49:
#P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51:
#P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53:
esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55:
These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57:
ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59:
elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61:
#P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63:
#P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65:
#P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67:
luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69:
#P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71:
#P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73:
1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75:
#P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85: G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97: #P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99: educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101: #P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103: data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105: in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107: trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109: elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111: four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113: #P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115: pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117: utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119: taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121: animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123: classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125: al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 128 and 129: differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131: IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133: Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135: Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137: AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139: Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141: Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143: See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr