#P134 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biology#P136 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyGenetic and Molecular Basis of Individual Differencesin Human Umami Taste PerceptionNoriatsu Shigemura 1 , Shinya Shirosaki 1 , Keisuke Sanematsu 1 ,Yoko Ogiwara 1,2 , Misako Kawai 1,3 , Ryusuke Yoshida 1 , YuzoNinomiya 11Sect Oral Neurosci, Grad Sch Dental Sci, Kyushu Univ Fukuoka,Japan, 2 External Scientific Affairs Dept, Ajinomoto Co. Inc.Tokyo, Japan, 3 Inst Life Sci, Ajinomoto Co. Inc. Kawasaki , JapanDuring periods of human expansion into new environments,recognition of amino acids through taste may have conferredan important selective advantage. Umami taste is elicited bymonosodium glutamate (MSG), and is one of five basic tastequalities that plays a key role in intake of amino acids. Aparticular property of umami is the synergistic potentiation ofglutamate by purine nucleotide monophosphates (IMP, GMP).A heterodimer of a G protein coupled receptor, TAS1R1 andTAS1R3, is proposed to function as its receptor. Polymorphicsites and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequencies inthese genes vary widely in human populations. If thediversification of these genes reflects adaptation to changingnutritional environments, the genetic variations of TAS1R1 andTAS1R3 may show correlations with differences in umamisensitivity and affect the receptor function. Here we showed theassociation between recognition thresholds <strong>for</strong> umami substancesand genetic variations in human TAS1R1 and TAS1R3, using tastetests and a heterologous expression system. This result suggeststhat natural selection on TAS1R1 and TAS1R3 alleles may havebeen particularly important, at least in part, in human evolution.#P135 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyIdentification of the Interaction site <strong>for</strong> Gymnemic acid at thesweet taste receptor T1R2+T1R3Keisuke Sanematsu 1,2 , Noriatsu Shigemura 1 , Masafumi Jyotaki 1 ,Seiji Nakamura 2 , Toshiaki Imoto 3 , Yuzo Ninomiya 11Section of Oral Neuroscience, Gracuate School of Dental Science,Kyushu University Fukuoka, Japan, 2 Section of Oral andMaxillofacial Oncology, Gracuate School of Dental Science,Kyushu University Fukuoka, Japan, 3 Division of IntegrativePhysiology, Department of Functional, Morphological andRegulatory Science, Tottori University Yonago, JapanGymnemic acid (GA) is a triterpen glycoside that is isolated fromthe plant Gymnema sylvestre. It is known that GA selectivelysuppresses taste responses to various sweet compounds withoutaffecting responses to salty, sour and bitter substances. Sweetsuppressingeffect of GA is specific to humans and chimpanzees,but not to rodents. It has also been shown that the sweetsuppressingeffect of GA is diminished by rinsing the tongue withg-cyclodextrin (CD). In order to examine whether GA directlyinteract with T1R2+T1R3, we used the sweet receptorT1R2+T1R3 assay in transiently transfected HEK293 cells.Similar to previous studies in humans and mice, GA (0.1 mg/ml)inhibited the [Ca 2+ ] i responses of cells heterologously expressinghT1R2+hT1R3 to SC45647, saccharin and D-tryptophan. Thesweet-suppressing effect of GA rapidly disappeared after rinsingthe cells with 1% g-CD. The mouse pair (mT1R2+mT1R3) wasnot sensitive to GA. One mismatched pair (hT1R2+mT1R3)behaved like the fully mouse heterodimer, showing no sensitivityto GA. These results demonstrate that hT1R3 is required <strong>for</strong> GAsensitivity. To identify the interaction site <strong>for</strong> GA, we examinedthe responses of the mouse/human chimeras of T1R2 and T1R3.The results suggest that the sensitivity to GA depends mainly onthe transmembrane region of human T1R3.P O S T E R SGenetic mutations and bitter taste sensitivity to foursubstancesStephen Wooding 1 , Natacha Roudnitzky 2 , Claudia Batram 2 , JennyStehr 2 , Marcel Winnig 2 , Christina Kuhn 2 , Wolfgang Meyerhof 21University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX,USA, 2 German Institute of Human Nutrition Nuthetal, GermanyBitter taste perception is initiated by TAS2R receptors, proteinsexpressed in taste buds. Mutations in the TAS2R genes can causevariation in bitter taste sensitivity. We investigated the effects ofmutations in three genes and their effects on the bitter perceptionof two artificial sweeteners (saccharin and acesulfame K) and twomarker substances, salicin and denatonium benzoate. Ourfindings support earlier evidence that mutations in the TAS2R43and TAS2R44 genes cause variable bitter perception of saccharin.We found that the same mutations account <strong>for</strong> variation in thebitterness of acesulfame K. In addition, we found that variation inthe TAS2R45 gene may be important in the bitter perception ofthese substances. Finally we found that these mutations differ infrequency among worldwide populations.#P137 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyThe role of the visual cortex in olfactory processing:an rTMS studyJohan N. Lundstrom 1,2 , Michael Waterston 3 , Jahan Jadauji 3 ,Christopher C. Pack 3 , Jelena Djordjevic 31Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA,2Department of Psychology, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA, USA, 3 Montreal Neurological Institute,McGill University Montreal, QC, CanadaIt has become clear that crossmodal connections modulateunimodal perception to a larger extent than previously thought.An example is the often-reported but seldom-discussed findingfrom olfactory imaging experiments that higher-order odor tasksactivate cortical areas commonly associated with visualprocessing. We are currently exploring this phenomenon usingrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a techniquethought to be capable of upregulating neuronal activity instimulated areas, as demonstrated by improved low contrastdetection following primary visual cortex (V1) stimulation.Through stimulation of V1, we are investigating the visualsystem’s impact on olfactory processing. In a within-groupdesign, either V1 (experimental condition) or the vertex (controlcondition) is stimulated while measures of olfactory identification,<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 69
supra-threshold discrimination, and peri-threshold intensitydiscrimination per<strong>for</strong>mance are obtained. Visual acuity isadditionally measured to verify successful stimulation of V1.Though a limited number of participants have been tested to date,initial analyses indicate that rTMS stimulation of V1 primarilymodulates supra-threshold discrimination and peri-thresholdintensity discrimination per<strong>for</strong>mance and has less impact onolfactory identification per<strong>for</strong>mance. These initial results indicatethat the primary visual cortex is capable of modulating higherorderolfactory processing.#P138 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyTAS1R1-intronic SNP <strong>Association</strong>s with Liking <strong>for</strong> DietarySources of Glutamate and <strong>for</strong> Orosensory IntensityShristi Rawal 1 , Margaret R. Wallace 2 , John E. Hayes 3 ,Linda M. Bartoshuk 4 , Taimour Y. Langaee 5 , Andrew Sholudko 1 ,Valerie B. Duffy 11Allied Health <strong>Sciences</strong>, Univ of CT Storrs, CT, USA, 2 MolecularGenetics & Microbiology, Univ of FL Gainesville, FL, USA,3Ctr Alcohol & Addiction, Brown Univ Providence, RI, USA,4Dentistry, Univ of FL Gainesville, FL, USA, 5 CtrPharmacogenomics, Univ of FL Gainseville, FL, USABackground: Gene products of the TAS1R family <strong>for</strong>mheterodimeric receptors that appear to mediate umami(hT1R1+hT1R3) and sweet (hT1R2+hT1R3) sensations (Li et al,2002). Limited in<strong>for</strong>mation exists on the contribution of TAS1R1variation to functional differences in taste perception, althoughexonic variation has been described in vivo (Kim et al, 2006).Methods: DNA samples from 90 healthy adults were collectedfrom whole bloods, isolated and genotyped <strong>for</strong> TAS1R1 intronicSNP (rs17492553) by TaqMan genotyping. Results: Similargenotype frequencies were seen in our sample (33% CChomozygous <strong>for</strong> major allele, 41% were heterozygous, 26%TT homozygous <strong>for</strong> minor allele) to reference frequencies <strong>for</strong>European-Americans (50%, 21%, and 29%, respectively). Usingthe sensory and hedonic <strong>for</strong>ms of the general Labeled MagnitudeScale, subjects rated the intensity of: liking and taste quality ofsampled foods/beverages, prototypical tastants painted onfungi<strong>for</strong>m and circumvallate papilla and tasted with the wholemouth; and 25% ethanol painted on the tongue tip. In analysis ofcovariance controlling <strong>for</strong> age, sex and intensity of tones as across-modal standard, CC adults reported greater liking <strong>for</strong>sampled soy sauce and white grapefruit juice (sources ofglutamate) than did TT adults, with concurrent increases insourness ratings <strong>for</strong> the juice. As expected, this SNP failed toexplain differences in liking and sweetness of sampled sweetfoods. However, this SNP explained intensity differences in thespatially-applied ethanol probe and tastants. The TT adults and, insome cases heterozygous adults, reported lower intensities thandid the CC adults. Conclusions: These results support a role ofTAS1R1 SNPs in response to glutamate and further suggest theircontribution to general variability in orosensory intensity.#P139 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyKey amino acid residues involved in multi-point bindinginteractions of sweet protein, brazzein, with the T1R2-T1R3human sweet receptorFariba Assadi-Porter 1 , Emeline L Maillet 2 , James Radek 1 ,John L Markley 1 , Marianna Max 21University of Wisconsin Madison, WI, USA, 2 Mount SinaiSchool of Medicine New York, NY, USABrazzein protein tastes sweet to humans through activation of thesweet sensing receptor heterodimeric GPCR composed ofmonomers T1R2 and T1R3. Brazzein’s sweetness depends onboth its three-dimensional structure and on distributed sites in itssurface chemistry as we have shown by structural, dynamic andfunctional assays (both human psychophysical taste assays andfunctional heterologous expression assays) of wildtype andmutant brazzein proteins. Here we show data from ourinvestigation of three “sweetness” sites on brazzein: loop 43 (Site1); the N and C termini and the proximal Glu36 residue (Site 2);and loop 9-19 (Site 3). We have found that the presence of basicresidues in Site 1, and acidic residues in Site 2 play significant roles<strong>for</strong> brazzein’s sweet taste. We also find that position 54 (Site 2)requires a bulky side chain rather than one with hydrogenbonding potential <strong>for</strong> sweetness. We determined that properdisulfide bond <strong>for</strong>mation in loop 9-19 (Site 3) is essential <strong>for</strong>sweetness. We also investigated several areas of the sweet receptorthat modify the brazzein response. We confirmed the involvementof the CRD of T1R3 in brazzein activity by identifying an acidicresidue that is essential <strong>for</strong> brazzein activity. We alsodemonstrated that the T1R2 VFTM participates in the ability ofbrazzein to activate the sweet receptor, suggesting that it too<strong>for</strong>ms a point of interaction <strong>for</strong> brazzein. We have assessed severalmodels <strong>for</strong> the brazzein binding site within the extracellulardomains of T1R2/T1R3 receptor by mutating charged and polarresidues within the small-molecule binding clefts as well asproximal residues in the interface between and along the backs ofthe T1R2 and T1R3 monomers and characterizing the resultingmutant receptors by a functional calcium mobilization assay.#P140 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensory processing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyOrbitofrontal lesions and hypersensitivity to olfactory stimuliJulie A. Boyle, Marilyn Jones-GotmanMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University Montreal,QC, CanadaHypersensitivity to odors has previously been reported in patientswith adrenal cortical insufficiency (Henkin and Bartter, 1966).However, little is known regarding other clinical causes ofhypersensitivity. We studied the olfactory profile two neurologicalpatients complaining of increased sensitivity to olfactory stimuli.Patient 1, MP, is a 40 year old right handed man with multiplecerebral contusions in the frontal, including the bilateralorbitofrontal (OFC) and left temporal (TL) cortices. Detectionthresholds <strong>for</strong> phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA) were assessedmonorhinally using an ascending staircase method. MP was ableto detect our weakest dilution of PEA (i.e. 16 th dilution step) ineach nostril. He has tested significantly above his neurologicallynormal peers whose mean sensitivity <strong>for</strong> PEA has been reportedto range between the 6 th to the 7 th dilution (Deems and Doty,70 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>2009</strong>
- Page 3 and 4:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10:
#4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12:
small population of cells respondin
- Page 13:
higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18:
conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20: expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21: glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25: TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27: not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29: POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31: and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33: activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47: #P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49: #P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61: #P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63: #P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65: #P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67: luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69: #P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73: 1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75: #P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85: G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97: #P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99: educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101: #P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103: data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105: in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107: trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109: elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111: four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113: #P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115: pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117: utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119: taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121:
animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123:
classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125:
al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127:
#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129:
differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131:
IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133:
Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr