#15 Gender effects on olfactory processingNeural control of sexually dimorphic behaviorsNirao ShahUCSF San Franciscio, CA, USASex specific behaviors such as mating and aggression are innatebehaviors in mice as they can be displayed without prior trainingor experience. Nevertheless, these behaviors are tightly regulatedby pheromones as well as by sex steroid hormones. We willpresent data demonstrating distinct sensory and hormonalcontrol of these behaviors.#16 Presidential Symposium: On beyond glomeruliFunctional Architecture of Inhibition in the Olfactory Bulb:Glomeruli and BeyondMichael T ShipleyDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Program inNeuroscience University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USASensory inputs are trans<strong>for</strong>med to outputs via mitral and tufted(MT) cell projections to olfactory cortex (POC). Inhibitionshapes this trans<strong>for</strong>mation at two levels: Glomerular circuitsmediate presynaptic inhibition of olfactory nerve (ON) terminalsand postsynaptic inhibition of MT apical dendrites.Infraglomerular circuits exert postsynaptic inhibition at MTlateral dendrites. Glomerular circuits: Two intraglomerularglomerular circuits operate on single glomeruli to mediatetonic/phasic and pre-/postsynaptic inhibition. Interglomerularcircuits enhance contrast among hundreds of distant glomeruliand multiglomerular circuits link smaller groups of neighboringglomeruli roughly the size of ‘modules’ responsive to structurallysimilar odors. Glomerular circuits lack POC feedback butcentrifugal modulatory inputs (5HT, ACh) strongly shapepre- and postsynaptic inhibition. Infraglomerular circuits:MTs reciprocally synapse with granule cells (GC), which mediaterecurrent and lateral inhibition of MTs. Infraglomerular circuitsare targeted by central modulatory inputs (5HT, ACh, NE).They receive massive cortical inputs, which excite GCs thusinhibiting MTs. How do these inhibitory circuits shape olfactoryprocessing? Modulatory inputs provide behavioral statedependent regulation of both glomerular and infraglomerularcircuits. Glomerular circuits are driven by sensory signals. Theyfollow repetitive ON inputs and exert more powerful inhibitionof MTs than previously thought. They temporally sharpen MTfiring and maintain contrast among glomerular outputs acrossdynamic changes in odor concentration. Infraglomerular circuitsare strongly influenced by cortical feedback, which may regulatechanges in MT firing across sniff cycles. Cortical feedback maymediate experience-dependent plasticity.#17 Presidential Symposium: On beyond glomeruliOlfactory systems theoryThomas A. Cleland 1 , Christiane Linster 21Dept. Psychology, Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA, 2 Dept.Neurobiology & Behavior, Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USAThe idea that glomerular activation patterns underlie odorperception and recognition is analogous to claiming that theinverted image maps of photoreceptor activation identify visualobjects; that is, the statement is not clearly wrong, but missesnearly the entirety of the problem. As with any sensory system,the olfactory receptor neuron layer serves the primary purposeof transducing environmental variance into profiles of neuralactivity. The resulting primary representations are degenerate,occluded, and naïve reflections of the odor environment;nominally identical stimuli emit variable odor signatures,unpredictable mixture elements and background odorsirreversibly interfere with the replicability of receptor activationprofiles, and there exists no clear means to distinguish importantfrom random sources of sensory variance. Meaningful perceptualin<strong>for</strong>mation must be constructed from this pool of structuredvariance by the neural circuitry of the olfactory bulb (OB) and themultiple secondary structures to which it projects. We will outlinethe computational problems faced by the olfactory system anddescribe models <strong>for</strong> how the architectures of its successive layersof neuronal processing contribute to their resolution. Particularattention will be paid to the analogous problems faced by othersensory systems, as well as the differences between them, and tothe role of memory in olfactory perception. Expanding upon ahistory of comparing the OB to the retina, we propose that anamalgam of the retina and primary visual cortex (V1) is a moreappropriate visual-system analogy <strong>for</strong> OB function.#18 Presidential Symposium: On beyond glomeruliOscillatory Modes and the Role of Task Structure inEarly Olfactory ProcessingLeslie M. KayDepartment of Psychology and Institute <strong>for</strong> Mind & Biology,The University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USAEarly stages of processing in the olfactory system are oftenconsidered to consist of relatively static mechanisms, dictated byglomerular input patterns, with minor adjustments related tointensity of the input signal and modulation of its strength bycentral processes. More recently, it has been shown by my lab andothers that changes in the temporal precision of mitral cells,signified by the gamma oscillation of the local field potential, arerelated to processing highly overlapping odorant input patterns.Recent work from my laboratory shows that gamma oscillationsare modified dependent on task demands. However, we have alsoshown that the structure of the task used to determine odoridentification can influence the type of oscillatory mode, theinvolvement of central brain areas in primary odor processing,and the difficulty of the discrimination itself. We show thatchanging the task from a two-alternative choice to a go/no-go taskalters the way in which the olfactory bulb, piri<strong>for</strong>m cortex andhippocampus participate in odor processing. The oscillatorysignature changes from a gamma oscillation local to the olfactorybulb, to a beta oscillation that is coherent with activity in these<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 11
higher order areas. The beta oscillation mode is thus not just adifferent frequency but a different network. This larger and moredistributed network is associated with more flexibility in learningodor associations.#19 Presidential Symposium: On beyond glomeruliRostral Olfactory CortexKurt R. IlligUniversity of Virginia Charlottesville, VA, USAIn mammals, several cortical areas receive direct input from theolfactory bulb. Although in some species these areas can comprise10% of total cortical volume, fundamental questions remainregarding their role in olfactory in<strong>for</strong>mation processing. In thispresentation, I will consider the circuitry and function of therostral olfactory cortical structures, and examine how theseregions may contribute to olfaction and odor-guided behavior.#20 Presidential Symposium: On beyond glomeruliOlfaction in the wider world: The cortex and beyondJoel PriceWashington University at St. LouisThe olfactory bulb projects through the lateral olfactory tractonto at least seven “primary” olfactory cortical areas. Althougha topographic organization has not been identified, the cortex isdominated by “association” connections from several of theolfactory cortical areas that match the bulbar projection.Throughout the olfactory cortex the fibers from the olfactorybulb end on dendrites in the superficial lamina of layer I, whileassociation fibers end on precisely complementary parts of thesame dendrites, and in deeper parts of the cortex. This providesa mechanism <strong>for</strong> cortex-wide integration of the in<strong>for</strong>mationcoming out of the bulb that is presumably the basis <strong>for</strong> olfactorydiscrimination. Many of the olfactory areas send axons intoisocortical areas in the caudal orbital and rostral insular cortex.Although these areas could be considered “higher order”olfactory cortex, they are substantially interconnected withadjacent areas in the orbital cortex that receive taste, visceral,visual and somatic sensory inputs. It appears that these areasintegrate olfactory in<strong>for</strong>mation with other modalities to provideassessment of flavor and other characteristics of food includingappearance and texture. In addition, this cortex codes <strong>for</strong> rewardor value as well as sensory aspects of the stimuli.#21 through #27 Development and Plasticity:First Central Chemosensory RelaysDevelopment and Plasticity:First Central Chemosensory RelaysCharlotte M. Mistretta 1 , David L. Hill 21University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USA,2University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA, USAThere is little in<strong>for</strong>mation about the nature, timing and extent ofdynamic processes that establish and maintain functional centralnuclei in chemosensation. Formation of functional groups duringdevelopment requires timed waves of neuron birth, migration, anddifferentiation. Neuron clusters then attract and receive sensoryinput that often dramatically reorganizes the maturing circuit.With data from moth, lobster, chick and rodent, across taste,olfactory and respiratory systems, we will explore how neuronsinitially come to cluster and receive specific sensory input, andunderstand feats of plasticity in central chemosensation. The focusis on the first central afferent relays of three systems. After anintroductory talk with general principles and mechanisms, therewill be three short talks with specific examples of early nucleusdevelopment. Then two concluding talks will emphasize plasticityin sensory relay nuclei in developing rostral and caudal rodentbrainstem. The symposium will stimulate development of newideas and questions about <strong>for</strong>mation of chemosensory nuclei —highly plastic central regions. C. Krull, University of Michigan.Mechanisms to establish functional groups of neurons: Lessonsfrom chick neurogenesis. L. Oland, University of Arizona.Roles <strong>for</strong> glia in regulating <strong>for</strong>mation of neuronal groups in motholfactory lobe. M. Schmidt, Georgia Sate University. Long lifeexpansion of olfactory brain in spiny lobster by neurogenesis.R. Bradley, University of Michigan. Establishing the rat tastenucleus of solitary tract (NST): A. Erisir, University of Virginia.Development and plasticity of neuron and synapse morphologyin rat rostral NST. D. Kunze, Case Western Reserve University.Plasticity in synaptic function following altered chemosensoryinput to caudal NST.#28 Polak Young Investigator Award WinnersNucleotide-mediated signaling in the olfactory epitheliumIvan Manzini 1,2 , Thomas Hassenklöver 1,2 , Silvia Kurtanska 1 ,Stephan Junek 1 , Ilonka Bartoszek 1 , Detlev Schild 1,21University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany, 2 DFG ResearchCenter <strong>for</strong> Molecular Physiology of the Brain (CMPB) Göttingen,GermanyExtracellular nucleotides are important signaling moleculesthat mediate various biological effects via cell-surface receptorstermed purinergic receptors. Here we employed functionalcalcium imaging in acute slice preparations of the olfactoryepithelium (OE) to investigate the effect of extracellularnucleotides on the different epithelial cell types of larval Xenopuslaevis. Nucleotides evoked distinct increases in the intracellularcalcium concentration [Ca 2+ ] i in sustentacular cells (SCs) andbasal cells (BCs), the olfactory stem cells of the OE, but not inolfactory receptor neurons. Thereby we were able to show thatnucleotides elicit intracellular calcium waves in SCs. The wavesinitiate in the apical part of the SCs and propagate towards theirendfeet in the basal part of the OE (wave velocity 17.10 ± 1.02µm/s). The characteristic increases in [Ca 2+ ] i could be evoked in12 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>2009</strong>
- Page 3 and 4: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10: #4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11: small population of cells respondin
- Page 17 and 18: conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20: expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21: glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25: TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27: not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29: POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31: and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33: activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47: #P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49: #P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61: #P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63:
#P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65:
#P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67:
luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69:
#P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71:
#P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73:
1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75:
#P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77:
discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79:
#P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81:
subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83:
#P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85:
G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87:
#P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89:
#P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91:
#P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93:
eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95:
presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97:
#P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99:
educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101:
#P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103:
data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105:
in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107:
trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109:
elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111:
four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113:
#P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115:
pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117:
utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119:
taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121:
animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123:
classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125:
al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127:
#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129:
differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131:
IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133:
Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr