#P103 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyPerception of Threshold and Suprathreshold Taste Stimuli inObese and Normal-Weight WomenM. Yanina Pepino 1,2 , Susana Finkbeiner 1 , Gary K. Beauchamp 1 ,Julie A. Mennella 11Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA,2Washington Univerisity in St. Louis, School of Medicine St. Louis,MO, USAThe goal of the present study was to determine whether obesewomen exhibit altered umami and sweet taste perception whencompared to normal weight women. To this end, each of 56subjects participated in a two-day study separated by one week.Half of the women were evaluated using mono sodium glutamate(MSG; prototypical umami stimulus) on the first test day andsucrose on the second test day; the order was reversed <strong>for</strong> theremaining women. We used two-alternative <strong>for</strong>ced-choicestaircase procedures to measure taste detection thresholds, a<strong>for</strong>ced-choice tracking technique to measure preferences, thegeneral Label Magnitude Scale to measure perceived intensity ofsuprathreshold concentrations and a triangle test to measurediscrimination between 29mM MSG from 29mM NaCL. We findthat although obese women required a higher concentration ofMSG to detect a taste, their perception of MSG at suprathresholdconcentrations, their ability to discriminate MSG from salt, andtheir preference <strong>for</strong> MSG and sweets were similar to that observed<strong>for</strong> normal-weight women. Regardless of their body weightcategory, 28% of the women did not discriminate 29 mM MSGfrom 29 mM of NaCl (Non Discriminators). Surprisingly, wefound that Non Discriminators at suprathreshold MSGconcentrations had similar MSG detection thresholds thanDiscriminators. Taken together, these data suggest that differentmechanism may be involved in the perception of threshold andsuprathreshold MSG concentrations.#P111 Poster session II: Cortical chemosensoryprocessing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyGroup III metabotropic glutamate receptors modulatetransmission of taste in<strong>for</strong>mation in primary taste afferentsRobert M HallockUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora, CO, USAPrimary afferent taste fibers use glutamate as the majortransmitter at their central terminals in the nucleus of the solitarytract (nTS). We investigated the role of metabotropic glutamatereceptors (mGluR) in regulating transmission in the primarygustatory nucleus of goldfish, the vagal lobe (homologous to thevagal gustatory portion of the nTS in mammals). We used an invitro slice preparation of the vagal lobe to determine the effects ofmGluR agonists/antagonists in transmission of gustatoryin<strong>for</strong>mation. In this preparation, primary gustatory afferents wereelectrically stimulated, while evoked dendritic field potentials(fEPSP) were recorded in the sensory layers of the vagal lobewhere the afferents terminate. We have previously shown that anmGluR agonist (L-AP4) attenuates synaptic components of thefEPSP to electrical stimulation of the primary taste afferent fibers.Here, we extended these findings by examining responses to anmGluR antagonist, MAP4. In Experiment I, we confirmed thatL-AP4 significantly depressed the fEPSP. Then, the addition ofMAP4 reversed the inhibitory effects of L-AP4 (p
#P105 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensoryprocessing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyAnterior Olfactory Nucleus: A Golgi Study ofDendritic MorphologyPeter C. Brunjes, Michael KenersonUnivesrity of Virginia Charlottesville, VA, USAThe anterior olfactory nucleus (AON) is the first bilaterallyinnervated structure in the olfactory system. It is typically dividedinto “pars principalis“, a thick ring of cells that surrounds theremnant of the olfactory ventricle [usually subdivided into parsmedialis (“pm“), dorsalis (“pd“), lateralis (“pl“) and ventroposterior(“pvp”)] and “pars externa“, a thin ring of cells encirclingthe anterior aspect of the structure. Little is known about theinternal structure of either region. We per<strong>for</strong>med a quantitativeGolgi study to provide the first detailed look at the resident cells.Brains from 8 juvenile rats were stained with the Golgi-Coxmethod and sections counterstained with methyleneblue. Neurolucida ® software was used to reconstruct the cells andsubject them to standard “branch” and “Sholl” analyses. A totalof 206 “pyramidal”-type cells were examined in pars principalis(68 from deep, 71 from middle and 67 from the superficial thirdsof Layer II, and further keyed as to location (19; pm, 73; pd, 86 ;pl, and 28; pvp). Preliminary analyses indicate no deep-superficialdifferences in total dendritic length or number of branches(medians: apical 855µm length and 18 branches, basilar: 17branches, 430 µm length). Two varieties of cells in pars externawere also examined: the typical cell with two apical dendritesextending into Layer Ib (sample = 50 cells: total dendritic length:894 µm) and a second, complex cell with more primary apicaldendrites plus basilar processes (26 cells: total apical length:944 µm, basilar length 605 µm). Other less common cells werealso observed, but due to the lack of a large sample were notsubjected to a quantitative analysis. The results provide importantin<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> understanding and modeling the circuitry ofthe AON#P106 Poster session III: Cortical chemosensoryprocessing/Receptor genomics and molecular biologyDetecting the taste-specific temporal type byfMRI – salty and sweet-Yuko Nakamura 1 , Tazuko K Goto 1 , Kenji Tokumori 1 , TakashiYoshiura 1 , Koji Kobayashi 2 , Yasuhiko Nakamura 2 , HiroshiHonda 1 , Yuzo Ninomiya 1 , Kazunori Yoshiura 11Kyushu University Fukuoka, Japan, 2 Kyushu UniversityHospital Fukuoka, JapanTaste perception has a temporal dimension. The sensoryevaluation in humans showed that, <strong>for</strong> example, the reaction timeis shorter in salty than in that of sweet. The purpose of this studywas to investigate the differences between salty and sweet intemporal neural responses in the human cortex. For this purpose,we used a new temporal model analysis to demonstrate thetemporal parcellation of brain activity by whole brain analysis viafMRI. Healthy volunteers (ten males and ten females, 19-29 yrs ofage) participated in this study, and all images were acquired with a3.0-T MRI. Salty (0.1M sodium chloride) and sweet (0.5Msucrose) were used as tastants and tasteless artificial saliva (25 mMKCl plus 2.5 mM NaHCO 3 ) as the control. Image data analysiswas per<strong>for</strong>med using the SPM5. First, we analyzed fMRI datasetsby using the standard approach model, and confirmed that theactivated areas of both tastants were located on the putativehuman primary taste cortex (uncorrected P
- Page 3 and 4:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10: #4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12: small population of cells respondin
- Page 13: higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18: conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20: expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21: glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25: TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27: not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29: POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31: and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33: activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47: #P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49: #P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 62 and 63: #P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65: #P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67: luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69: #P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71: #P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73: 1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75: #P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85: G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97: #P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99: educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101: #P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103: data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105: in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107: trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109: elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111:
four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113:
#P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115:
pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117:
utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119:
taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121:
animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123:
classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125:
al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127:
#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129:
differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131:
IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133:
Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr