#P58 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyBitesize is affected by Food Aroma presented at Sub- orPeri Threshold ConcentrationsRene A de Wijk 1 , Ilse A. Polet 1,2 , Johannes HF Bult 2,31AFSG/CICS Wageningen, Netherlands, 2 TIFN Wageningen,Netherlands, 3 NIZO Food Research Wageningen, NetherlandsBite sizes <strong>for</strong> foods typically vary with the food’s familiarity andwith its hedonic and textural properties. More over, smaller bitesizes tend to be more satiating than larger ones and bite sizes tendto become smaller when the consumer becomes more satiated.These results indicate that bite size control is sensitive to generalfood properties as well as to the internal state of the consumer.To explore the effect of food aromas on bite size, a semi-solidvanilla custard dessert was delivered into the mouth of subjectsusing a pump while a cream aroma was presented retro-nasally inthe nose. Termination of the pump, which determined bite size,was controlled by the subjects via a pushbutton. Over 30 trials thecustard was presented randomly either without an aroma, or witharomas presented below or near detection threshold. Results <strong>for</strong>10 subjects, 4 females and 6 males aged between 26 and 50 years,indicated that aroma intensities affected sizes of the correspondingbites as well as subsequent bites. Higher aroma intensities resultedin significantly smaller sizes of the corresponding bite. Higheraroma intensities resulted in a directional similar but smaller andnon-significant effect on the subsequent bite, and a reversed andsignificant effect on the bite thereafter. These results suggest thatbite size control during eating is a highly dynamical processaffected by sensations elicited by present and preceding bites.The results contribute to our understanding of bite-size andfood intake regulations, and may be of relevance <strong>for</strong> weightmanagement.#P59 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologySimilarities in Food Cravings and Mood States betweenObese Women and Women who Smoke TobaccoSusana Finkbeiner 1 , M. Yanina Pepino 1,2 , Julie A. Mennella 11Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA,2Washington University, School of Medicine St. Louis, MO, USAWomen who smoke crave starches and fats more frequently thanthose who never smoked. Here, we determined whether thesecravings and some mood disturbances were related to effects ofsmoking per se or were characteristic of women who were likelyto smoke. Further, because obese individuals crave fats morefrequently than lean counterparts, we explored whether theseassociations were affected by body weight. We interviewed andgrouped 229 women according to smoking history (neversmokers, <strong>for</strong>mer smokers and current smokers) and body weightcategory (normal weight, overweight, obese). Each subjectcompleted the Food Craving Inventory to measure cravings <strong>for</strong>sweets, high fats, starches, and fast food fats and the Profile ofMood States to measure psychological distress. We found that,even after controlling <strong>for</strong> socioeconomic factors, smoking andobesity were independently associated with specific food cravingsand mood states. Current smokers craved fats more frequentlythan <strong>for</strong>mer and never smokers. They also craved starches morefrequently, and felt more depressed and angrier, than neversmokers, but not <strong>for</strong>mer smokers. Similarly, obese women cravedfats more frequently than non obese women and depressionsymptoms were intensified with increasing body weights. Inconclusion, whereas cravings <strong>for</strong> starchy foods and some moodstates may be characteristic of women who are likely to smoke,more frequent cravings <strong>for</strong> fat is probable an effect of smoking perse. We hypothesize that the overlapping neuroendocrinealterations associated with obesity and smoking and theremarkable similarities in food cravings and mood states betweenwomen who smoke and women who are obese suggest thatcommon biological mechanisms modulate cravings <strong>for</strong> fat in thesewomen.#P60 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyPROP Sensitivity and Dietary Intake ofAntioxidant-Rich FoodsYvonne Koelliker 1 , Beverly J. Tepper 1 , James E. Simon 2 , John R.Burgess 31Dept. of Food Science, Rutgers University New Brunswick, NJ,USA, 2 Plant Biology and Pathology, Rutgers University NewBrunswick, NJ, USA, 3 Dept. of Foods and Nutrition, PurdueUniversity West Lafayette, IN, USAAntioxidant-rich foods are known to be an important part of ahealthy diet. However, often these foods can have high levels ofphytonutrients which impart a bitter taste, making them lessacceptable to consumers. Genetic sensitivity to 6-npropylthiouracil(PROP) may be a marker <strong>for</strong> the selection ofantioxidant-rich foods. Some studies have demonstrated thatPROP non-tasters (NT) showed a higher acceptance of bitterfruits and vegetables (sources of Vitamins A, C, and E) andvegetable oils (source of Vitamin E) than medium (MT) andsuper-tasters (ST). The aim of this study was to relate PROPsensitivity to the dietary intake of these major antioxidantvitamins. Healthy, non-vegetarian females, ages 21-44 yrs, whodid not take dietary supplements were classified as NT (n=30),MT (n=33), and ST (n=30) based on the PROP paper diskmethod. The subjects provided three, 24-hour diet recalls whichwere collected and analyzed using NDS-R software. Eatingattitudes were measured using the Dutch Eating BehaviorQuestionnaire. There were no differences in the consumption offruits, vegetables, or vegetable oils across taster groups. However,when the subjects were further divided by restrained eating,NT who were also low in dietary restraint had higher intakes ofa-tocopherol (Vitamin E) than the other groups (p=0.05). Thesedata are consistent with Tepper et al, 2008, showing that NT hadhigher plasma a-tocopherol levels than MT and ST. Takentogether, these data suggest that NT consume more a-tocopherol(principally derived from green vegetables and vegetable oils inthe U.S. diet), which may be reflected in higher plasma indices <strong>for</strong>this antioxidant nutrient. The health implications of thisrelationship should be further examined.P O S T E R S<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 45
#P61 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/Neuroethology<strong>Association</strong> of a TAS2R38 Polymorphism and the EatingBehavior Disinhibition in a Female Amish CohortCedrick D. Dotson 1 , Hillary Shaw 2 , Steven D. Munger 1 ,Nanette I. Steinle 21Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University ofMaryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA, 2 Departmentof Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition,University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USAInsensitivity to the bitter-tasting compound 6-n-propylthiouracil(PROP) has been associated with increased adiposity, especiallyin women. The principal genetic determinants of phenotypicvariation in PROP taste sensitivity are haplotypes of the TAS2R38gene, which encodes a taste receptor sensitive to thioureacompounds such as PROP and phenylthiocarbamide. As dietaryintake can affect adiposity, we asked if variation in TAS2R38 isassociated with any of 3 eating behaviors: restraint (a cognitiveavoidance of eating to control body weight), disinhibition (a lossof restraint associated with overeating), and hunger. We hadpreviously genotyped haplotype-tagging, single nucleotidepolymorphisms (SNPs) located within the TAS2R gene cluster onhuman chromosome 7 (which includes TAS2R38) in 729nondiabetic individuals (381 females, 348 males) within the AmishFamily Diabetes Study. Eating behaviors were assessed in theseindividuals using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Weper<strong>for</strong>med association analysis of the TAS2R38 SNP rs1726866and these three traits. Results of our analysis (adjusted <strong>for</strong> age andsex) showed a marginally significant association of the minor (C)allele with decreased disinhibition (P=0.03). Stratification of thecohort by sex revealed a strong association in females (P=0.0002)but not in males (P=0.76). Analyses with other haplotype-taggingSNPs in close proximity to rs1726866 suggest that this locus isprincipally responsible <strong>for</strong> the association signal. There<strong>for</strong>e, ourresults indicate that a polymorphism in TAS2R38 is associatedwith differences in ingestive behavior. Support: DC005786,HL076768, DK072488, DE007309, UMSOM.#P62 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyModulation of sweet taste sensitivity by glucagon signalingin taste budsAmanda E.T. Elson 1 , Cedrick D. Dotson 1 , Josephine M. Egan 2 ,Steven D. Munger 11Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University ofMaryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA, 2 NationalInstitute on Aging/NIH Baltimore, MD, USAHormones that facilitate glucose homeostasis in the gut may alsoregulate taste sensitivity in taste buds. For example, glucagon-likepeptide 1 (GLP-1), a regulator of insulin biosynthesis and release,is expressed in taste receptor cells and appears to modulate sweettaste sensitivity through local paracrine signaling. We previouslyshowed that glucagon is expressed in a subset of taste receptorcells, but its pattern of distribution and effects on taste functionare not known. We quantified the expression of glucagon, itsreceptor (GlucR) and other taste cell markers in mousecircumvallate taste buds using immunohistochemistry andstereological cell counting. In contrast to GLP-1, which isexpressed in subsets of both 5HT+ and PLC 2+ cells, glucagonimmunoreactivity is largely restricted to a subset of PLC 2+ cells.We saw similar expression patterns in fungi<strong>for</strong>m and foliate tastebuds. GlucR expression appears to overlap with that of glucagon,suggesting an autocrine signaling mechanism in taste buds.We next tested the effects of a highly-specific GlucR antagonistL-168,049 using a brief access taste test. Mice that received thedrug showed a significant reduction in taste sensitivity to sucrose;there were no significant differences in responses to NaCl ordenatonium benzoate. Together, these data suggest a role <strong>for</strong>glucagon signaling at the level of the taste bud in the modulationof sweet taste sensitivity.#P63 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologySweet receptor gene (Tas1r2) structure and preference <strong>for</strong>sweet stimuli in species of CarnivoraJoseph G. Brand 1,3 , Dieter Glaser 2 , Weihua Li 1 , Gary K.Beauchamp 1,4 , Xia Li 11Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA,2Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of ZürichZürich, Switzerland, 3 Department of Biochemistry, School ofDental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA,USA, 4 Department of Psychology, School of Arts and <strong>Sciences</strong> andDepartment of Anatomy, School of Veterinary Medicine,University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USAThe extent to which taste receptor specificity correlates with, oreven predicts, diet choice is not known. We recently reported thatthe insensitivity to sweeteners shown by species of Felidae can beexplained by the observation that the gene <strong>for</strong> their sweet tastereceptor is a pseudogene. To broaden our understanding of therelationship between the structure of the sweet receptors andpreference <strong>for</strong> sugars and artificial sweeteners, we measured tasteresponses to 12 sweeteners in select species of Carnivora usingtwo-bowl preference tests, and sequenced the Tas1r2 gene in thesesame (or closely related) species using PCR. Based on behavioraland molecular data, we found that lions showed no preference <strong>for</strong>any of the 12 sweet compounds tested and that they possess thepseudogene of Tas1r2. All other species tested preferred some ofthe natural sugars, and their Tas1r2 sequences, having completeopen reading frames, predict functional sweet receptors. Onespecies, the lesser panda, in addition to preferring natural sugars,also preferred three (neotame, sucralose and aspartame) of the sixartificial sweeteners. Hereto<strong>for</strong>e it had been reported that amongvertebrates, only Old World simians could taste aspartame. Thesedata suggest an evolutionary convergence or a serendipitousmutation in the sweet receptor of the lesser panda. Continuingstudies will provide insights into the nature and function of tastereceptor genes and how their variation affects taste perception,food choice and nutritional status.46 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>2009</strong>
- Page 3 and 4: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10: #4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12: small population of cells respondin
- Page 13: higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18: conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20: expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21: glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25: TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27: not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29: POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31: and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33: activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49: #P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61: #P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63: #P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65: #P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67: luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69: #P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71: #P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73: 1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75: #P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85: G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97:
#P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99:
educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101:
#P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103:
data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105:
in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107:
trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109:
elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111:
four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113:
#P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115:
pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117:
utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119:
taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121:
animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123:
classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125:
al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127:
#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129:
differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131:
IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133:
Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr