#P64 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyGABA-A Receptor Activation Influences Consumptionof Appetitive and Aversive TastantsDavid W. Pittman 1 , Molly McGinnis 1 , Elizabeth Miller 1 ,Lindsey Richardson 1 , John-Paul Baird 21Department of Psychology, Wof<strong>for</strong>d College Spartanburg, SC,USA, 2 Department of Psychology, Amherst College Amherst,MA, USABenzodiazepines act through GABA-A receptors to increase theinhibitory effect of GABA in the brain. Previous research hasshown that hyperphagia is a common side effect ofchlordiazepoxide (CDP) and benzodiazepines in general.Although the majority of previous research has focused primarilyon the palatability of sweet stimuli, a taste reactivity test suggestedthat benzodiazepines influence appetitive responses with little orno effect on responses to sour or bitter taste stimuli. The objectiveof this study was to examine the effects of CDP on lickingresponses to not only appetitive stimuli but also aversive stimuliacross a range of concentrations. Using counterbalancedmethodology, a within-subject design assessed the effect of CDP(10mg/kg) versus saline on the microstructural licking patterns ofwater-restricted rats (n=16) to one concentration of saccharin,sucrose, NaCl, MSG, citric acid, or quinine (Q-HCl) during 1-hrtests. Licking responses across 3 concentrations of each tastantwere compared using a between-subject analysis. Results from thepresent study show that CDP increased the appetitive qualitiesacross all of the taste categories, primarily through changes intaste-mediated variables. CDP increased the number of meal licks(sucrose, saccharin, MSG, NaCl, Q-HCl) through shorter pausedurations (sucrose, saccharin, MSG, NaCl, citric acid), increasedlick rates (sucrose, saccharin, MSG, Q-HCl, citric acid), andincreased licks in the first minute of testing (saccharin, NaCl,citric acid, Q-HCl). There was no drug effect on variablesassociated with post-ingestive feedback such as meal duration ornumber of bursts. This supports previous research thatbenzodiazepines enhance the taste palatability of sweet stimuliand expands this finding to umami, salt, and bitter tastants.#P65 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyConditioned preferences <strong>for</strong> glucose and fructose inT1R3 KO and TRPM5 KO miceSteven Zukerman 1 , Robert F. Margoskee 2 , Anthony Sclafani 11Brooklyn College of CUNY Brooklyn, NY, USA, 2 Mount SinaiSchool of Medicine New York, NY, USADeletion of the genes <strong>for</strong> the sweet taste receptor subunit T1R3or the signaling protein Trpm5 greatly attenuates sweetenerpreference in mice. However, knockout (KO) mice missing T1R3or Trpm5 develop preferences <strong>for</strong> sucrose solutions in 24-h testsdue to the post-oral actions of the sugar. The present studycompared the preferences of KO and C57BL/6J wildtype (WT)mice <strong>for</strong> glucose and fructose in 24-h taste tests with 0.5-32%sugar vs. water. Unlike glucose and sucrose, fructose has minimalpost-oral reward effects. T1R3 KO mice were initially indifferentto dilute glucose solutions (0.5-4%) but developed preferences <strong>for</strong>8-32% sugar in test 1. They strongly preferred (~90%) all glucoseconcentrations in test 2. New T1R3 KO mice were indifferent to0.5-8% fructose but avoided 16-32% fructose in both tests.Trpm5 KO mice were indifferent to 0.5-4% glucose but preferred8-32% glucose in test 1 and all concentrations in test 2. NewTrpm5 KO mice were indifferent to 0.5-32% fructose in test 1 butmildly preferred (~75%) fructose in test 2. WT mice preferredglucose and fructose in both tests. Why T1R3 KO but not Trpm5KO mice avoided 16-32% fructose is uncertain. Perhaps fructoseabsorption is impaired in T1R3 KO mice (due to missing gutT1R3 receptors) which inhibits fructose intake. Yet T1R3 KO andTrpm5 KO mice given glucose in tests 1 and 2 subsequentlydisplayed strong (~90%) preferences <strong>for</strong> 0.5%-32% fructose in athird test. Apparently, the post-oral effects of glucose condition astrong preference <strong>for</strong> the sugar’s T1R3-independent orosensoryproperties (odor, texture) that generalize to those of fructose.Fructose, rather than glucose or sucrose, can be used with tasteimpairedKO mice to evaluate 24-h sugar taste preferences withpost-oral reward effects minimized.#P66 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyNutrient-specific preferences in trpm5 knockout miceXueying Ren 1,2 , Jozelia G Ferreira 1,2,3 , Jenny Tong 4 ,Catherine W Yeckel 1,5 , Ivan E de Araujo 1,21The John B Pierce Laboratory / Yale University New Haven,CT, USA, 2 Department of Psychiatry, Yale University NewHaven, CT, USA, 3 Institute of Biomedical <strong>Sciences</strong>, University ofSao Paulo Sao Paulo, Brazil, 4 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes& Metabolism, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH, USA,5Epidemiology & Public Health, Yale University New Haven,CT, USAWe are investigating the relative influence of postingestive effects,in contrast to gustatory input, on amino acid vs. carbohydrateintake. Mice knockouts of TRPM5 (KO, [1]), a TRP ion channel,lack behavioral and cranial nerve responses to sweet and L-aminoacid tastants [1]. These animals nevertheless retain the ability todevelop preferences <strong>for</strong> sipper locations associated with nutrientavailability [2]. We have monitored behavioral, thermogenic andbrain dopamine responses following glucose and L-serine intakein both KO mice and their wild-type counterparts (WT).During short-duration two-bottle tests, WT mice displayedoverwhelming preferences <strong>for</strong> glucose vs. isocaloric L-serine andL-histidine solutions. In contrast, KO mice exhibited indifferenceto the choices as well as significantly lower levels of intake.However, when allowed to <strong>for</strong>m associations between thepostingestive effects of the solutions and the respective sipperlocations, both KO and WT mice displayed a robust preference<strong>for</strong> sipper locations previously associated with glucoseavailability, compared to isocaloric L-serine. Indirect calorimetryrevealed a close relationship between respiratory quotient valuesand intake levels, suggesting an association between fuelutilization and nutrient selection. Furthermore, microdialysismeasurements revealed nutrient-specific dopaminergic responsesin ventral striatum upon intra-gastric infusions of glucose orL-serine. These preliminary findings suggest that preferences <strong>for</strong>carbohydrates over other nutrients can develop independently oftaste quality or caloric load, an effect potentially associated withthe ability of a nutrient to regulate glucose metabolism andstimulate brain dopamine release. Refs. [1] Zhang et al Cell 2003112:293-301. [2] de Araujo et al Neuron 2008 57:930-41.P O S T E R S<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 47
#P67 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyTaste Receptor T1R3 is Involved in Detection of EthanolFlavor in MiceVladimir O. Murovets 1 , Vasily A. Zolotarev 1 ,Robert F. Margolskee 2 , Alexander A. Bachmanov 31Pavlov Institute of Physiology Saint-Petersburg, Russia,2Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, NY, USA,3Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USAPrevious studies suggested that humans and rodents perceivesweet and bitter components of ethanol flavor, and that in micegenetic differences in ethanol preference depend on allelicvariation of the Tas1r3 gene encoding the sweet-taste receptorprotein, T1R3. The aim of the present study was to examine therole of T1R3 in qualitative taste perception of ethanol bymice. We used mice from the alcohol-preferring strain C57BL/6Jwith either intact Tas1r3 gene (wild-type) or with a null mutationof this gene (knockouts, Tas1R3 -/-). In these mice, consumptionof ethanol solutions was assessed in the long-term 48-h two-bottletest, and then licking responses to ethanol (1.25-20%), sucrose(1-32%) and quinine (0.01-1 mM) were recorded in brief-accesstests using the Davis MS-160 gustometer be<strong>for</strong>e and after LiClinducedconditioned taste aversion (CTA) to 10% ethanol wasdeveloped. Compared to wild-type mice, Tas1r3 -/- micedemonstrated concentration-dependent reduction ofconsummatory responses to ethanol in both brief access andtwo-bottle tests, and also had reduced licking rates of sucrosesolutions. The wild-type and Tas1r3 -/-mice had similar lickingresponses to quinine and did not differ in CTA to ethanol, whichgeneralized to quinine, but not sucrose, in mice of bothgenotypes. These data support a conception of two-component(sweet and bitter) taste of ethanol and suggest that perception ofits sweet component depends on the T1R3 receptor, whileperception of its bitter component does not depend on T1R3.Probably, complexity of 10% ethanol flavor and/or salience of itsbitter component prevented generalization of CTA from ethanolto sucrose in this experiment.#P68 Poster session II: Chemosensory response to,and control of, feeding/NeuroethologyEffect of kokumi taste active peptides on amiloride-insensitivesalt taste preference in C57BL/6J miceMeeRa Rhyu 1 , Ah-Young Song 1 , Keiko Abe 2 , Vijay Lyall 31Food Function Research Division, Korea Food Research InstituteSeongnam-Si, South Korea, 2 Department of Applied BiologicalChemistry, The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan, 3 Physiology,Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA, USAPreviously, we have shown that kokumi taste active peptides (FII)derived from a mature Korean soy sauce modulate salt taste onhuman and the amiloride-insensitive NaCl chorda tympani (CT)taste nerve responses by interacting with TRPV1 variant salt tastereceptor (TRPV1t). To identify the peptides that modulateTRPV1t, FII was further separated into LHa, LHb, LHc, LHd,LHe by column chromatography and their behavioral effects weretested in wild-type C57BL/6J mice using 48h two-bottlepreference tests, in which one bottle contained distilled water andthe other a test solution made with NaCl + 10 M amiloride.Intake of NaCl expressed as the preference ratio. In solutions0-300 mM NaCl containing 10 M amiloride, 150 mM NaCl gavea maximum preference and 300 mM decreased the preference tothe maximum by 50%. In 100 mM NaCl + 10 M amiloride,varying the concentrations of FII (0-1.0%) produced biphasiceffect of NaCl preference. Between 0.1% and 0.5% concentration,FII enhanced NaCl preference, but above 0.5%, FII lowered thepreference. The salt taste modulating effect of FII was transited toLHe: LHe (0.25%) significantly lowered preference <strong>for</strong> 100 mMNaCl as compared with control (p
- Page 3 and 4: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10: #4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12: small population of cells respondin
- Page 13: higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18: conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20: expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21: glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25: TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27: not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29: POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31: and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33: activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47: #P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61: #P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63: #P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65: #P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67: luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69: #P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71: #P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73: 1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75: #P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85: G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97: #P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99:
educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101:
#P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103:
data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105:
in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107:
trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109:
elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111:
four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113:
#P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115:
pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117:
utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119:
taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121:
animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123:
classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125:
al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127:
#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129:
differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131:
IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133:
Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr