utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We employed dynamicolfactometry, natural odor sampling (sniffing), a three-alternative<strong>for</strong>ced-choice procedure against carbon-filtered air blanks, and alarge, tightly controlled, vapor stimulus source quantified via gaschromatography. Concentration-detection, i.e., psychometric,functions, from which odor detection thresholds (ODTs) can bedetermined, constituted the outcome of interest. Among ketones,ODTs decreased from acetone to 2-heptanone, remainingconstant <strong>for</strong> 2-nonanone. Among alkylbenzenes, ODTs decreasedfrom toluene to butyl benzene, then increased <strong>for</strong> hexyl andfurther <strong>for</strong> octyl benzene. These ODT trends resembled thosefound in the literature but the absolute ODTs were consistentlyamong the lowest previously reported. Interindividual variabilityof ODTs amounted to about one order of magnitude. Theoutcome provides additional support to the key role played inodor potency by physicochemical parameters governing thetransfer of the odorant from the vapor phase (where it enters thenose) through the various biophases (from the nasal mucus to theolfactory receptor environment), but it also indicates that, at somepoint, molecular dimensions begin to put a limit, and even reverse,the gain in olfactory potency observed with increasing carbonchain length. Supported by grant number R01 DC002741 <strong>for</strong>mthe NIDCD, NIH.#P282 Poster session VI: Chemosensory developmentand Psychophysics ICigarette Smoking and the Olfactory Detection of CyanideJeneca J. Dovey, David E. HornungSt. Lawrence University Canton, NY, USASome organic chemists of a bygone era claimed smoking waslinked to an increased sensitivity to cyanide and so they justifiedsmoking because cyanide exposure was a profession hazard.The purpose of this study was to text this claim. Smokers andnonsmokers between the ages of 18 and 22 were ask to rate theintensity of a series of odors using the Green Scale (ChemicalSenses 21:323-334, 1996). Olfactory threshold measurements werealso determined <strong>for</strong> four odorants. Included in the odorants used<strong>for</strong> the intensity ratings were almond oil, ground-up peach pitsand trans-2-hexenal. Almond was included because it has acyanide-like smell, peach pits because they contain cyanidecompounds and trans-2-hexenal because it closely resembles themolecular structure of cyanide. Two of the odors used <strong>for</strong> thethreshold measurements were almond oil and trans-2-hexenal.Confirming what has been reported in many other studies, on theaverage, smokers gave lower intensity ratings and had higherthresholds compared to nonsmokers. However the intensityratings <strong>for</strong> trans-2-hexenal were not as reduced when compared tothe ratings <strong>for</strong> the other odorants and its threshold was notreduced by smoking. As a possible explanation <strong>for</strong> thisobservation, perhaps the cyanide like compounds found in somecigarettes are facilitating olfactory detection <strong>for</strong> this compoundand this facilitation offsets the overall decrease in olfactory abilitythat often accompanies smoking. In conclusion, although theremay be some validity in the claims of the organic chemists, theseresults suggest they would have been even better at detectingcyanide if they had not smoked at all.#P283 Poster session VI: Chemosensory developmentand Psychophysics IRetronasal olfaction influences swallowingMyriam Ebnoether 1 , Antje Welge-Luessen 1 , MarkusWolfensberger 1 , Thomas Hummel 21Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Basel,Switzerland, 2 Smell & Taste Clinic, University of Dresden MedicalSchool Dresden, GermanyObjectives: Identical ortho- and retronasal stimuli are processeddifferently. Since retronasal odorant perception is stronglyassociated with food intake and flavour, an influence of retronasalstimulation on swallowing can be assumed. It was the aim of ourstudy to evaluate the impact of retronasal olfaction onswallowing. Subjects and Methods: Fifty normosmic andnormogeusic subjects (23 male, 24 female, mean age: 24 .2 years,range: 18-42) took part in the study. Olfactory stimuli (vanillin,40 % vol/vol) were presented randomized ortho- and retronasally(8 stimuli each) using a computer-controlled olfactometer.Simultaneously a sweet taste (glucose) was continuously deliveredthrough a taste dispenser which was kept within the mouth.Ultrasound examination of the mouth floor was continuouslyrecorded on a videotape to monitor swallowing activity. Thevideotapes were evaluated by one of the authors´ blindedconcerning place of stimulation (ortho- vs. retro). Results: Afterretronasal stimulation swallowing not only occurred faster(7.49 vs. 9.42s; p
measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction betweengroups and pre-/post-conditioning A1 detection thresholds; theExperimental group demonstrated a significant increase and theControl group a significant post-conditioning sensitivity decrease,relative to pre-conditioning. Re-testing of olfactory sensitivity toA1 two months post-conditioning indicated no differencebetween the two groups. Taken together, these data demonstratethat the olfactory system exhibits rapid plasticity with thefunctional benefit of a sharp and odorant specific increase inabsolute detection threshold.#P285 Poster session VI: Chemosensory developmentand Psychophysics IEffects of sub-threshold odorants on rapid olfactoryadaptation in human observersRyan R. Keith 1 , Swati Pradeep 1 , Erica M. Rodriguez 1 , KatherineE. Boylan 1 , Danielle A. Broome 1 , Neal R. Delvadia 1 , David W.Smith 1,21Dept. of Psychology, University of Florida Gainesville, FL,USA, 2 University of Florida Center <strong>for</strong> Smell and TasteGainesville, FL, USAIn previous presentations we have described use of a novelpsychophysical technique <strong>for</strong> estimating the onset time course ofperceptual odor adaptation in humans. The premise of thetechnique is that extended presentation of an odorant willproduce adaptation, decreasing the sensitivity of the receptor andincreasing thresholds <strong>for</strong> a brief, simultaneous target odorantpresented at various time-points after the adapting stimulus onset;where both the adapting odorant and the target odorant are thesame (i.e., self adapting). Those results suggested that perceptualodorant adaptation was measureable within 100-200 ms afterstimulus onset. In those initial studies, the adapting odorantconcentration <strong>for</strong> each subject was set to twice the baselinethreshold <strong>for</strong> the 600-ms target (i.e., the same level relative tothreshold). In this presentation, using the same stimulusparadigm, we report changes in perceptual adaptation collectedwith the adapting odorant set to different subthresholdconcentrations levels. To characterize the effect of adaptingodorant level we used a liquid-dilution olfactometer to estimatetwo-bottle discrimination thresholds <strong>for</strong> brief (600 ms)presentations of vanilla odor; 13 volunteers (ages 18-21) served assubjects. Adapting odorant concentration levels were then set to0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 times threshold concentration <strong>for</strong> each subjectand threshold <strong>for</strong> the 600-ms target was measured as a function ofthe relative delay between the onset of the adapting stimulus andthe onset of the target. The results demonstrate that significantincreases in odorant sensitivity were evident even at subthresholdadapting odorant levels. The time course of this subthresholdadaptation was similar to that measured with suprathresholdadapting odorants.#P286 Poster session VI: Chemosensory developmentand Psychophysics IUpdate on Racial and Gender Differences in Odor PerceptionCharles J. Wysocki 1 , Danielle R. Reed 1 , Doron Lancet 2 , YehuditHasin 2 , Jennifer Louie 1 , Lisa Oriolo 1 , Fujiko Duke 11Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA,2Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, IsraelFor the past four years we have been screening African-Americanand Caucasian men and women <strong>for</strong> sensitivity to a select group ofodorants, viz., 5-a-androst-16-en-3-one (androstenone; having aurinous or sandalwood odor), amyl acetate (banana- or pear-likeodor), Galaxolide (musky), isovaleric acid (sweaty), 3-methyl-2-hexenoic acid (3M2H; sweaty), pentadecalactone (musky), benzylsalicylate (balsamic), muscone (musky), Jeger’s Ketel (woody,amber), 2-nonenal (unpleasant, fatty), skatole (fecal) and geosmin(earthy), selected because some people have a specific anosmia tothe odorant. Psychophysical testing is per<strong>for</strong>med in a singlesession and DNA is obtained <strong>for</strong> subsequent analysis. Phenotypicdifferences between the two racial groups and between men andwomen have been observed. Caucasians have a significantlygreater rate of specific anosmia to androstenone (7%) than doAfrican-Americans (0%). The opposite is true <strong>for</strong> benzylsalycilate (Caucasians, 22%; African-Americans, 35%).Disregarding race, men exhibit higher rates of specific anosmias<strong>for</strong> amyl acetate (3% vs 0%), Jeger’s Ketel (7% vs. 2%) andandrostenone (10% vs. 3%) than do women. Among individualswho can smell the odorants, Caucasians have higher olfactorydetection thresholds <strong>for</strong> 3M2H (0.0058 w/v), Galaxolide(0.0407% v/v) and isovaleric acid (0.0020% w/v) than doAfrican-Americans (respectively, 0.0024%; 0.0092%; and0.0006%). Data collection continues and the above is subjectto change.#P287 Poster session VI: Chemosensory developmentand Psychophysics ITaste cell specific over-expression of BDNF leads to multiplefold increase of expression levels of BDNF and increased sizeand number of taste budsIrina Nosrat 1 , Shailaja Kishan Rao 1 , Weikuan Gu 1 , RobertMargolskee 2 , Christopher Nosrat 11University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis, TN,USA, 2 Mount Sinai School Medicine New York, NY, USABrain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is the most potentneurotrophic factor in the taste system during development, and isalso expressed in taste cells of adult mice. We over-expressedBDNF using a promoter <strong>for</strong> alpha-gustducin to study the roles ofBDNF in the adult taste system. Gustducin is normally expressedin type II receptor cells that also express G-protein coupled tastereceptors. Taste buds were isolated using laser capturemicrodissection from circumvallate papillae of six weeks oldgustducin-BDNF taster mouse lines. RNA was isolated and realtime PCR analysis revealed a six-fold increase of BDNF in twotransgenic mouse lines. We also employed immunohistochemistryon taste papillae of gustducin-BDNF mice using Troma-1antibody which identifies taste buds. In addition, we analyzedtongue surface and papillae morphology using scanning electronmicroscopy. Circumvallate papillae are wider in gustducin-BDNFcompared to wild-type mice. Additionally, circumvallate tastebuds in high BDNF expressing transgenic mice are wider and116 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>2009</strong>
- Page 3 and 4:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10:
#4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12:
small population of cells respondin
- Page 13:
higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18:
conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20:
expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21:
glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25:
TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27:
not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29:
POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31:
and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33:
activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35:
the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37:
including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39:
and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41:
75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43:
on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45:
#P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47:
#P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49:
#P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51:
#P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53:
esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55:
These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57:
ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59:
elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61:
#P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63:
#P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65:
#P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67: luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69: #P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71: #P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73: 1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75: #P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85: G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97: #P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99: educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101: #P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103: data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105: in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107: trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109: elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111: four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113: #P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115: pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 118 and 119: taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121: animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123: classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125: al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127: #P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129: differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131: IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133: Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135: Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137: AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139: Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141: Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143: See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr