11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 11. Post-Treaty Events 187income taxes, the sale and licensing <strong>of</strong> Crown lands was the engine and fuel <strong>of</strong> provincialambition. Mowat's strategy, dubbed "Empire Ontario," was to maximize Ontario's area andexploit the resources in the less populated areas <strong>of</strong> the province for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the metropolis,Toronto.[966] Vipond's report, Ex. 123, contains the following:At pp. 13-14The basic principle <strong>of</strong> forest management in Ontario, both pre- and post-Confederation, was thatforests were for rent but not for sale. For various reasons, this basic policy… for Ontario… produced"an extraordinary financial bonanza throughout the last two decades <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century." AsNelles notes, "(w)henever the provincial treasurer required additional revenue to meet hisobligations…, the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Crown Lands merely auctioned <strong>of</strong>f another batch <strong>of</strong> timberlimits." … Timber rights…were so lucrative … that, according to Nelles' calculation, between 1867and 1899 timber fees accounted for approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> the total revenue <strong>of</strong> the government <strong>of</strong>Ontario. …2011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)With so much at stake, Ontario guarded its right to manage its forests vigilantly – even when thisprovoked controversy with the federal government. …At pp. 16-17Political: …The exploitation <strong>of</strong> natural resources generated revenue that could be used to developthe sort <strong>of</strong> infrastructure – roads, schools, cheap power – that would generate more revenue. Thiswas the essence <strong>of</strong> Ontario's strategy to build a modern industrial state. Yet as revenue needs grew,so grew the need to enlarge the hinterland from which resources could be extracted. Thus, for OliverMowat, who served as premier from 1871-1896, extending Ontario's boundaries beyond the limitsestablished in 1867 was absolutely essential to the future health and prosperity <strong>of</strong> Ontario. ……Extending Ontario's boundary was not simply about economic development, however. There were atleast two political motivations as well. First, by controlling more resources over a broader territory,Mowat's Liberals believed they would build enduring political support for their party andgovernment. … Control over land and natural resources simply increased the opportunities fordispensing patronage enormously.At p. 18:These imperatives, at once economic and political, help to explain why the dispute over theplacement <strong>of</strong> Ontario's western and northern boundaries became one <strong>of</strong> the signature strugglesbetween Mowat's Ontario and Macdonald's Ottawa. …[Footnotes & references omitted.[967] After three days <strong>of</strong> hearings in August 1878, the Boundary Commission decided that thewest/east boundary between Ontario and Canada was about at the westerly limit <strong>of</strong> the Treaty 3lands. The Disputed Territory, roughly 2/3 <strong>of</strong> the Treaty 3 lands, was held to be in Ontario. Itwas a big victory for Ontario. There was a huge rally in Niagara Falls and parades were held tocelebrate in Toronto, London and Bothwell.The Conservatives are Elected[968] Before either Ontario or Canada could act on the decision <strong>of</strong> the Boundary Commission,Macdonald's federal Conservatives won a federal election and took <strong>of</strong>fice again on October 17,1878.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!