11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table <strong>of</strong> ContentsvSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings <strong>of</strong> Fact Part 1....................................................................................... 17711. POST-TREATY EVENTS ................................................................................................... 178Attempting Reserve Allocation Amidst Political Upheaval................................................... 179The Liberals are Elected ..................................................................................................... 179Events, 1878 - 1887 ................................................................................................................ 186The Boundary Dispute ........................................................................................................ 186The Conservatives are Elected............................................................................................ 187The St. Catherine's Milling Case ........................................................................................ 193Negative Fallout Affecting the Treaty 3 Ojibway after the Release <strong>of</strong> the St. Catherine'sMilling Decision/ Negative Repercussions <strong>of</strong> the Boundary Dispute on Treaty 3 Ojibway............................................................................................................................................. 193The 1894 Agreement: Ratification <strong>of</strong> the 1891 Legislation ................................................... 200The Annuities Case (heard 1903-1910) .............................................................................. 202Relations Between Ojibway and Euro-Canadians 1909-1912............................................ 202The Background to the Annexation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Keewatin</strong> to Ontario in 1912..................................... 203Confirmation <strong>of</strong> Reserves and Other Developments- 1915.................................................... 209The Evidence <strong>of</strong> Williams and Epp re Land Use in Ontario 1873-1930................................ 214Evidence re Development in <strong>Keewatin</strong>............................................................................... 216Evidence re Development in the Disputed Territory .......................................................... 2161920s-1950s: Developments in the Disputed Territory and the <strong>Keewatin</strong> Lands .................. 217The Present Day...................................................................................................................... 223The Evidence <strong>of</strong> William Fobister...................................................................................... 223Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples......................................................................... 22612. FINDINGS OF FACT, PART II........................................................................................... 227Findings re Identity <strong>of</strong> The Treaty Parties.............................................................................. 227Re Canada's and the Ojibway's Understanding <strong>of</strong> the Identity <strong>of</strong> Their Treaty Partner andtheir Duties to Each Other................................................................................................... 227Re Ontario's Understanding <strong>of</strong> the Identity <strong>of</strong> the Treaty Parties in the Late 19 th and Early20 th Centuries as Evidenced by its Post-Treaty Conduct.................................................... 230Findings re the Meaning <strong>of</strong> the Harvesting Clause................................................................. 231Re Post-Treaty Conduct Shedding Light on Mutual Understanding <strong>of</strong> the Meaning <strong>of</strong> theHarvesting Clause ............................................................................................................... 231Re Compatibility <strong>of</strong> Ojibway/Euro-Canadian Land Usage After 1873.............................. 233Re Ontario's Evidence <strong>of</strong> Euro-Canadian Development in Ontario 1873-1930................. 23413. ANSWER TO QUESTION ONE ......................................................................................... 236Step 1: The Law: Principles <strong>of</strong> Treaty Interpretation ............................................................. 237Step 2: The Application <strong>of</strong> the Principles <strong>of</strong> Treaty Interpretation ........................................ 2392 (a) The Wording <strong>of</strong> the Harvesting Clause...................................................................... 2392(a)(i) The Importance <strong>of</strong> the Written Word To the Ojibway and Canada .................... 2392(a)(ii) The Literal Meaning <strong>of</strong> the Words ..................................................................... 241Conclusion Re 2(a)(i) and 2(a)(ii)................................................................................... 2422(b) What were the Mutual Intentions <strong>of</strong> the Parties as to the Meaning <strong>of</strong> the HarvestingClause as <strong>of</strong> 1873 that best reconcile the interests <strong>of</strong> the parties at the time the Treaty wassigned? ................................................................................................................................ 2422011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!