11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 12. Findings <strong>of</strong> Fact Part II 236[1246] I reject Ontario's submission that evidence regarding the lack <strong>of</strong> complaints regardingdevelopment within the Disputed Territory is useful in shedding light on their understanding <strong>of</strong>the Treaty in 1873.[1247] In short, I conclude that the lack <strong>of</strong> Ojibway complaints in the Disputed Territory after1891 is not probative <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the contentions Ontario is urging upon this Court.13. ANSWER TO QUESTION ONEQuestion OneDoes Her Majesty the Queen in Right <strong>of</strong> Ontario have the authority within that part <strong>of</strong> the landssubject to Treaty 3 that were added to Ontario in 1912, to exercise the right to "take up" tracts <strong>of</strong> landfor forestry, within the meaning <strong>of</strong> Treaty 3, so as to limit the rights <strong>of</strong> the Plaintiffs to hunt or fish asprovided for in Treaty 3?Emphasis added.][1248] I have answered Question One in seven steps:Step 1: The Principles <strong>of</strong> Treaty Interpretation2011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)Step 2: Application <strong>of</strong> the Principles <strong>of</strong> Treaty Interpretation to the Harvesting Clause(a) Wording <strong>of</strong> the Harvesting Clause(i) The Importance <strong>of</strong> the Written Word to the Ojibway and Canada(ii) The Literal Meaning <strong>of</strong> the Harvesting Clause(b) What were the mutual intentions <strong>of</strong> the parties as to the meaning <strong>of</strong> the HarvestingClause as <strong>of</strong> 1873 that best reconcile the interests <strong>of</strong> the parties at the time theTreaty was signed?Step 3: Is an interpretation based on my finding <strong>of</strong> mutual intention Constitutional?Step 4: Bearing in mind the answers to Steps (1) (2) and (3) above, as <strong>of</strong> 1873, what isthe answer to Question One?Step 5: The Effect <strong>of</strong> the 1891/1894 Legislation/Agreement(a) Did the 1891/1894 Reciprocal Legislation/Agreement declare Ontario's existingrights or did it give Ontario additional rights that it did not have under the Treaty?(b) Did it apply to <strong>Keewatin</strong> after 1912 [and confer the same rights on Ontario inrespect <strong>of</strong> <strong>Keewatin</strong> as it had with respect to the Disputed Territory before 1912]?Step 6: The Devolution Argument.Step 7: In light <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the above, what is the answer to Question One?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!