11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table <strong>of</strong> ContentsivThe Interests <strong>of</strong> the Ojibway/What the Ojibway Knew.......................................................... 1011. Whether They Needed a Treaty ...................................................................................... 1012. Whether They Understood They Would Be Required to Change Their Way <strong>of</strong> Life .... 104The Ojibway Understanding <strong>of</strong> What They Were Being Asked to Give Up...................... 105The Meaning <strong>of</strong> the Harvesting Clause .................................................................................. 108What did the Ojibway and the Commissioners Understand on October 3 about whetherMorris' October 1 Proposal was Accepted? Had it been Superseded by a Different Promiseby the time the Treaty was Signed on October 3? .............................................................. 108The Promise <strong>of</strong> Ammunition and Twine ............................................................................ 110The Nolin Note ................................................................................................................... 110Dawson's Post-Treaty Recollections <strong>of</strong> the Treaty Negotiations relevant to the Intent andMeaning <strong>of</strong> the Harvesting Clause...................................................................................... 114Why Did Morris Refer to the Dominion Government in the Harvesting Clause?.............. 117The Meaning <strong>of</strong> "Taking Up" ............................................................................................. 120Evidence Relevant to the Interpretation <strong>of</strong> the Understanding <strong>of</strong> the Parties in 1873 withregard to the Identity <strong>of</strong> the Treaty Parties ............................................................................. 121The Interests <strong>of</strong> Ontario .......................................................................................................... 1319. CREDIBILITY OF THE EXPERTS ...................................................................................... 131The Ethno-Historical Witnesses (Lovisek, Chartrand and Von Gernet) ................................ 131Lovisek................................................................................................................................ 131Chartrand............................................................................................................................. 134Von Gernet.......................................................................................................................... 141The Historical & Political Witnesses...................................................................................... 145Milloy.................................................................................................................................. 145Saywell................................................................................................................................ 146Vipond................................................................................................................................. 14610. FINDINGS OF FACT, PART 1 ........................................................................................... 147Findings re Interests <strong>of</strong> Canada .............................................................................................. 147Findings re Interests <strong>of</strong> Ojibway............................................................................................. 153Re The 1869 Demands........................................................................................................ 155Findings re The Harvesting Clause......................................................................................... 156The Ojibway Understanding <strong>of</strong> the Harvesting Clause at the Time the Treaty was Signed............................................................................................................................................. 156Finding re Understanding <strong>of</strong> Canada re Likely Compatibility <strong>of</strong> Traditional Harvesting andAnticipated Euro-Canadian Land Uses............................................................................... 160Finding re Were the Harvesting Promises Broadened on October 3, 1873/Did the OjibwayAccept Morris' October 1, 1873 Proposal? Had the Commissioners Amended it by October3, 1873?............................................................................................................................... 160Why Did Morris Mention the Dominion in the Harvesting Clause?.................................. 165Did the Ojibway Understand and Accept that Canada Could Interfere with Their TreatyHarvesting Rights?.............................................................................................................. 167Findings Re The Parties' Understanding with respect to the Identity <strong>of</strong> the Treaty Parties ... 170The Ojibway's Understanding on the Identity <strong>of</strong> the Treaty Parties................................... 170Canada's Understanding on Identity <strong>of</strong> the Treaty Parties.................................................. 1762011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!