11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 11. Post-Treaty Events 210[1088] On the ground in the Treaty 3 area, Dawson and Dennis, the federal Surveyor General,worked to address the problems that had arisen in the reserve creation process. Dennis negotiatedthe Rainy River Agreement mentioned earlier, creating reserves and recognizing and protectingOjibway fisheries.[1089] The federal government proposed to reserve the right to fish commercially in the Lake <strong>of</strong>the Woods only to the Indians, and banned use <strong>of</strong> pound nets by white fishermen. (Muirhead,"The Ontario Boundary Dispute and Treaty 3 1873-1915," p. 11.)[1090] These actions were all indicative <strong>of</strong> a federal willingness to go beyond the IndianDepartment and enforce Treaty Harvesting Rights on a multi-departmental basis, in someinstances even in preference to Euro-Canadian harvesting rights.[1091] In the few years following Confederation and after 1873, the federal government alsoused its powers to advocate on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Indians with respect not only to on-reserve but also<strong>of</strong>f-reserve matters.2011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)[1092] When sturgeon stocks were being depleted, Dawson and Prime <strong>Minister</strong> Macdonaldspoke out in Parliament about protecting fisheries for the Ojibway. Macdonald promised to havehis <strong>Minister</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fisheries look after this matter "within [Canada's] Constitutional powers."[1093] Canada's post-Treaty activities protecting Harvesting Rights between 1873 and about1892 involved federal departments other than the Department <strong>of</strong> Indian Affairs, including theDepartment <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and the Dominion Lands Department. Prime <strong>Minister</strong> Macdonaldhimself was vocal in protecting the Indians.[1094] Canada's conduct in the years that immediately followed the Treaty was consistent withan understanding that it owed the Ojibway a duty to implement and enforce the Harvestingpromises made to induce them to enter into the Treaty.[1095] When the Ojibway complained about problems in Treaty implementation andenforcement, initially the federal government did act. Dennis promised that well-groundedcomplaints would be remedied. Dominion employees Pither, Dawson and Dennis attempted toaddress their complaints. Canada set up reserves as promised, including the gardens and sturgeonfishing areas for their exclusive use. It paid annuities. Twine, ammunition and agriculturalimplements were supplied.[1096] In the years preceding St. Catherine's Milling, most <strong>of</strong> the Treaty 3 area was administeredby Canada under the 1874 Provisional Agreement. The federal government coordinated landgranting and Indian policy through the Board <strong>of</strong> Commissioners charged with managing IndianAffairs. That Board included both the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Indian Affairs (at first Provencher) andthe federal Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Lands.[1097] Lovisek's evidence and Chartrand's cross-examination on Muirhead's article, "TheOntario Boundary Dispute and Treaty 3: 1873-1915" (contained in the secondary sourcecollection <strong>of</strong> documents) cast light on the federal government's early but apparently short-lived

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!