11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 4. Euro-Canadian History 1758-1871 19[120] In 1864, concerns escalated about protecting the West against American aggression whena large number <strong>of</strong> Sioux warriors fled from the United States into southern Manitoba, with theAmerican cavalry in hot pursuit.The Lead Up To ConfederationNegotiations re Annexation <strong>of</strong> the West[121] The evidence was uncontradicted that in British North America, there were differences <strong>of</strong>public opinion over the advisability <strong>of</strong> acquiring the HBC Territories. French Québec wasambivalent, the Maritime Provinces lukewarm to hostile. Nevertheless, Ontario pressed ahead.Discussions re Jurisdiction over Indians/Indian Lands[122] When the leaders <strong>of</strong> the Maritime Provinces met at Charlottetown in 1864 to discuss apossible maritime union, the United Canadians crashed the conference, advocating a broaderunion.2011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)[123] At the Charlottetown and Québec Conferences <strong>of</strong> 1864, the groundwork for the creation<strong>of</strong> the Dominion <strong>of</strong> Canada was laid.[124] Since Confederation was initially largely an Ontario initiative, the blueprint for Canadawas based primarily on the Ontario experience. John A. Macdonald and others from Ontariopr<strong>of</strong>fered the first suggested division <strong>of</strong> powers.[125] There was general agreement that Canada would be a federal state and that Parliamentwould have jurisdiction over matters <strong>of</strong> national concern, the local legislatures over localmatters.[126] There is no extant record <strong>of</strong> a debate or any other document that clearly explains whyCanada took responsibility for Indians.[127] Von Gernet reviewed the papers from the Charlottetown conference and found nomention <strong>of</strong> Indians. He located the first mention <strong>of</strong> Indians in documents from the QuébecConference held about a month later, in October 1864.[128] Macdonald's papers from the Québec Conference, some <strong>of</strong> which are in evidence in thiscase, contain the handwritten words "and lands reserved for Indians" beside the word "Indians."From those papers it seems evident that the original resolution stating that "It shall be competentfor the general legislature to pass laws" did not mention Indians. By the end <strong>of</strong> the conference,under the powers <strong>of</strong> "the general Parliament," "Indians and lands reserved for Indians" had beenincluded as Number 29. (Ex. 1, Vol. 18, tab 884, "Resolution regarding the division <strong>of</strong> powers,"October 29, 1864; Milloy, October 15, 2009)[129] Milloy gave evidence that by the time <strong>of</strong> the Québec conference, there was generalagreement that the annexation <strong>of</strong> Rupert's Land would take place when a confederated Canada

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!