11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 4. Euro-Canadian History 1758-1871 29asked for reserves. They opined that the 1869 Demands were not presented to representatives <strong>of</strong>Canada before October 2, 1873.[170] Lovisek opined that the 1869 Demands, made only by the Chiefs in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> theDawson Route/Right <strong>of</strong> Way and not from throughout the whole Treaty 3 area, related to a right<strong>of</strong> way. She said the Ojibway were requesting reserves in the area <strong>of</strong> the right <strong>of</strong> way becausethey wanted to ensure their sturgeon fishing and garden areas were safeguarded for their ownexclusive use.Progress on the Construction <strong>of</strong> the Dawson Route[171] In a report to the <strong>Minister</strong> <strong>of</strong> Public Works dated May 1, 1869, Dawson noted that withthe aid <strong>of</strong> the Indians, a line practicable for a road from Fort Garry to the Lake <strong>of</strong> the Woods hadbeen located.2011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)[172] On August 13, 1869, the Chief Engineer <strong>of</strong> Public Works reported [Ex. 1, Vol. 4, tab 59]to the Civil Engineer at Ottawa that that road was under construction.Insurrection at the Red River[173] Once it became clear that Rupert's Land and the North-West Territory would soon beadmitted into the Dominion <strong>of</strong> Canada, Canada passed the Temporary Government <strong>of</strong> Rupert'sLand Act, 1869. In it, William McDougall was appointed Lieutenant-Governor <strong>of</strong> the "North-West Territories" and instructed to familiarize himself with the situation on the ground before thetransfer, then scheduled for December 1, 1869.[174] In October 1869, a number <strong>of</strong> Métis protesters including Louis Riel resolved to block hisentry to Fort Garry and proclaimed the establishment <strong>of</strong> a provisional government. (Von Gernetreport, Ex. 44, at p. 37-39; also Chartrand's report, Ex. 60 at p. 58.)[175] Chartrand's report, Ex. 60, contains the following:At pp. 52-53:…As an agreement between the Dominion government and the HBC was apparently settled and atransfer planned for December 1, 1869, the question <strong>of</strong> title to lands was further complicated by twointervening developments. First, in a speech from the throne on November 3, 1869, the Province <strong>of</strong>Ontario determined to launch formal inquiries into determining the true location <strong>of</strong> the northwesternboundaries <strong>of</strong> the province, issues that had been raised in relation to original inquiries by the Province<strong>of</strong> Canada in 1857 and during 1868-1869 negotiations between the Dominion government the HBCfor the Rupert's Land transfer. Second, by 1869 the lack <strong>of</strong> recognition for Métis land and culturalrights in the Rupert's Land transfer negotiations had raised serious concerns among some Métisleaders at Red River. As the transfer appeared imminent, Louis Riel and other leaders initiated anarmed insurrection at Red River in the fall <strong>of</strong> 1869.At pp 307-308:The settlement with respect to the transfer <strong>of</strong> title <strong>of</strong> Rupert's Land did not include a legaldetermination <strong>of</strong> the location <strong>of</strong> the HBC's southern boundary. Ontario had a clear interest in havingthis issue resolved since it had inherited the western and northern boundaries <strong>of</strong> 'Canada West' /Upper Canada. As Zaslow elaborates:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!