11.07.2015 Views

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

Keewatin v. Minister of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part 7. The 1873 Negotiations 88[385] They then adjourned for an hour so that Morris could complete the text <strong>of</strong> the formalTreaty. Morris' October 14 report contains the following:At the expiration <strong>of</strong> that period, the conference was resumed, and after the reading <strong>of</strong> the treaty andan explanation <strong>of</strong> it in Indian by the Honourable James McKay, it was signed by the commissionersand by the several chiefs…[386] The experts disagreed as to how McKay explained the Treaty in Ojibwe to the Indians.Later in these Reasons, I summarize and analyze that evidence later in these Reasons.[387] After McKay's explanation, the Treaty was signed.[388] The Treaty was approved by a federal Order in Council on October 31, 1873.8. ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE AS IT RELATES TO THE INTERESTS OFTHE PARTIES2011 ONSC 4801 (CanLII)The Interests <strong>of</strong> Canada[389] As noted earlier, there was much documentary and viva voce evidence before this Courtrelevant to Canada's interests in completing the 1873 Treaty. I have already reviewed much <strong>of</strong>the relevant historical evidence.[390] Here I shall first review the specific evidence as to the background and knowledge <strong>of</strong>each <strong>of</strong> the Treaty Commissioners.What Morris Knew[391] By 1873, Alexander Morris, the lead treaty negotiator in 1873, was already an importantfigure in Canadian history.[392] At the time <strong>of</strong> the negotiations, Morris was the Lieutenant-Governor <strong>of</strong> Manitoba and theNorthwest Territories, and a member <strong>of</strong> the Indian Affairs Management Board that also includeda Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Crown Lands and a representative <strong>of</strong> Indian Affairs. As a member <strong>of</strong> thatBoard, he knew by its make-up it contemplated communication and cooperation among variousfederal departments, including Indian Affairs and Crown lands (Ex. 4, p. 213.)[393] Counsel for the Plaintiffs submitted that because <strong>of</strong> his background in political and publicaffairs and his interest in history, the historical evidence already covered in these Reasons wouldhave been known to Morris.[394] In the lead-up to the 1873 negotiations and as they progressed, Morris was aware <strong>of</strong> thechallenges <strong>of</strong> developing the Canadian nation, including linking the East to the Prairies andBritish Columbia.[395] Vipond gave evidence (February 23, 2010 at p. 11) that Morris was a "publicintellectual," a keen student <strong>of</strong> Canadian history, especially Canadian Imperial history, whowrote grandly and thought big thoughts. His world-view was <strong>of</strong> "a heroic British empire."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!