D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E S E K K E NM:regjeringen.no 2008). The fact that equality in the collaboration wouldprevent censorship or shocked parents, outrageous projects and failedopportunities is not mentioned in the debate at all. The one world does nottouch the other, as the award would show.The Entertaining Lesson — The Incompetent TeacherThere is rec<strong>og</strong>nition that some projects have a difficult time as theprofessions have opposing interests. However, the only critique in this is thatthe ‘school world’ has to be better at pedag<strong>og</strong>ic reflections in the aftermath ofprojects. The artist comments on the exhibition situation that: “I get soinspired by being part of it, and I see how important it is that artists get torelay their competence to the children” (M:Gerhardsen 2007:7). 92 The textgoes on to explain that the artist has: “... understood what it takes to inciteengagement and interest” (M:Gerhardsen 2007:7). 93 The teachers aredescribed as lacking necessary competence to be involved (M:Eidem 2007a;M:Eidem 2007b; M:Holdhus 2008), and it is suggested that this lack ofcompetence, not collaboration difficulties, is the main problem. Theywelcome productions, but are not involved as: “At the same time I canunderstand schools, because art is not necessarily important to them. One isafraid of what one cannot understand…” (M:Eidem 2007b:8). 94 It is evenexplicitly stated that while artists are creative, the teachers have aresponsibility to keep the pupils quiet and calm. “... have not taken on anykind of teacher role, we haven’t yelled or scolded sort of…” (I:A1). 95 Theartists don’t want to deal with the ‘problem of individuality’ in relation toanything other than when the child is occupied in a set frame with a setproject in a set context with a teacher to facilitate. The story of theblackboard regime has become a way to label teaching as static andpacifying. However this backfires in my view when the pictures show the“new blackboards”, paintings and PowerPoint. At the same time, thisrepresents a recipe thinking that is very traditional in form. There are a fewworks of art, the educator talks of techniques, content and use of colours.They talk of whether the picture is abstract or not. Then they talk of thefeelings it might incite in the children. This is what has been labelled ‘blackboarding’ by pedag<strong>og</strong>ues themselves. Sometimes it is needed, but a lot of thetime it is pacifying.92 OQ: “Jeg blir så inspirert av å være med, <strong>og</strong> jeg ser hvor viktig det er at kunstnere får videreføre sinkompetanse til barna”.93 OQ: “... skjønt hva som skal til for å vekke engasjement <strong>og</strong> interesse”.94 OQ: “Samtidig skjønner jeg skolene, fordi kunst ikke nødvendigvis er viktig for dem. Man er jo redd alt manikke forstår ...”.95 OQ: “... ikke har tatt noe sånn lærerrolle, vi har ikke kjefta, vi har ikke smelt liksom!”.102
T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SIt is stated that: “The school and the artist has to understand and know eachother’s reality and work processes” (M:Nesje and Klakegg 2007:15). 96Indirectly it supports the claim that DKS projects will get the best results ifthe teachers are involved, and the school has an active role: “The pupilsreceive a holistic experience of art and culture, and it is placed in a largersubject theory frame” (M:Nesje and Klakegg 2007:15). 97 At the same timethere is a turn around to claim that the teacher cannot fulfil the educationalaims. Not necessarily as they lack competence — but they fail to motivate thepupils and demand results: “The artist often has different demands of thepupils, and sometimes even demand more, than the school does. The artistsstyle of work, methods and dissemination seem to engage and motivate theschool children to give more” (M:Nesje and Klakegg 2007:15). 98 I do notpossess the background material for this school development project, but itwould, in my view, have to be an extensive study to be able to soconclusively state that the artist’s approach differs radically from theteacher’s work.There is also a conception of individualism, but not individuality, assomething prized in the ‘art world’. They prize the inspiration that can makethe single individual create a work of art, or produce a singular result. At thesame time they have no interest in facilitating the differentiation question inschools. In a classroom the school children are all on different levels inknowledge, skills and self-sufficiency. The romantic notion that, throughfantasy, the child will produce art sets limitations on the thoughts ofindividual learning adaptation: “… everyone managed it — at least nearlyeveryone” (I:A1). 99 This is in itself a paradox. The artists enter and claim thatthey are representing individuality, however are not inclined to findindividuality in their classes simulating. Too much freedom of thought andactions from the children during their presentations are labelled as rude,disruptive or unwanted. The teachers are blamed for not keeping the childrenin line, or not managing their jobs properly (M:Henmo 2006). This stands incontrast to the view expressed as to how the pedag<strong>og</strong>isation and limitingclassroom methods are hindering the child’s creativity. Pedag<strong>og</strong>isationbecomes a way of labelling the opposing view through giving a negativeconnotation to the basis for the profession. Cleverly situated amidst claims ofold-fashioned teachers, blackboards and strict rules that limit the freedom,pedag<strong>og</strong>isation then becomes associated with something restraining the spiritand standing in the way of personal growth.96 OQ: “Skolen <strong>og</strong> kunstneren må forstå <strong>og</strong> kjenne til hverandres virkelighet <strong>og</strong> arbeidsprosesser”.97 OQ: “Elevene får en helhetlig opplevelse av kunst <strong>og</strong> kultur, <strong>og</strong> det settes inn i en faglig teoretisksammenheng”.98 OQ: “Kunstneren stiller ofte andre krav til elevene, <strong>og</strong> tidvis høyere krav enn det skolen gjør. Kunstnerensarbeidsstil, metoder <strong>og</strong> formidling ser ut til å engasjere <strong>og</strong> motivere elevene til å yte mer”.99 OQ: “…alle fikk vel til det – nesten i alle fall”.103
- Page 2:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 6 and 7:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 8 and 9:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 12 and 13:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 14 and 15:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 16 and 17:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 18 and 19:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 20 and 21:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 22 and 23:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 24:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 28 and 29:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
- Page 31 and 32:
S T R A T E G Ythere one solution p
- Page 33 and 34:
S T R A T E G Yboth aware of this,
- Page 35 and 36:
S T R A T E G YAccording to Yin, it
- Page 37 and 38:
S T R A T E G Yproductions of these
- Page 39 and 40:
S T R A T E G Ypsychology, and is c
- Page 41 and 42:
S T R A T E G Ytheir beliefs, desir
- Page 43 and 44:
S T R A T E G Ynarratives within th
- Page 45 and 46:
F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
- Page 47 and 48:
F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
- Page 49 and 50:
F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
- Page 51 and 52:
F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
- Page 53 and 54:
F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
- Page 55 and 56:
F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
- Page 57 and 58:
F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
- Page 59 and 60:
T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 61 and 62: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 63 and 64: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 65 and 66: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 67 and 68: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 69 and 70: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 71 and 72: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 73 and 74: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 75 and 76: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 77 and 78: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
- Page 79 and 80: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 81 and 82: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 83 and 84: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 85 and 86: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 87 and 88: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 89 and 90: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 91 and 92: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 93 and 94: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 95 and 96: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
- Page 97 and 98: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SThe
- Page 99 and 100: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SThe
- Page 101 and 102: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sfind
- Page 103 and 104: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sbe a
- Page 105 and 106: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SAnot
- Page 107 and 108: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E S“
- Page 109 and 110: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sstat
- Page 111: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Ssucc
- Page 115 and 116: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Steac
- Page 117 and 118: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sin e
- Page 119 and 120: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E STher
- Page 121 and 122: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SThe
- Page 123 and 124: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sshe
- Page 125 and 126: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Screa
- Page 127 and 128: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 129 and 130: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 131 and 132: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 133 and 134: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 135 and 136: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 137 and 138: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 139 and 140: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 141 and 142: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 143 and 144: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 145 and 146: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 147 and 148: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
- Page 149 and 150: E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 151 and 152: E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 153 and 154: E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 155 and 156: E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 157 and 158: E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 159 and 160: E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 161 and 162: E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 163 and 164:
E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 165 and 166:
E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
- Page 167 and 168:
T H E M Y T H E X P O S E Doriented
- Page 169 and 170:
T H E M Y T H E X P O S E Dprogram.
- Page 171 and 172:
T H E M Y T H E X P O S E Dmight be
- Page 173 and 174:
B I B L I O G R A P H YBénatouïl,
- Page 175 and 176:
B I B L I O G R A P H YBumgarner, C
- Page 177 and 178:
B I B L I O G R A P H YConference,
- Page 179 and 180:
B I B L I O G R A P H YHaabesland,
- Page 181 and 182:
B I B L I O G R A P H YKlafki, Wolf
- Page 183 and 184:
B I B L I O G R A P H YLied, Edith.
- Page 185 and 186:
B I B L I O G R A P H YEducation. T
- Page 187 and 188:
B I B L I O G R A P H YSchjønsby,
- Page 189 and 190:
B I B L I O G R A P H YThavenius, J