CON â¢ TEXT - Arkitektur- og designhÃ¸gskolen i Oslo - AHO

More documents

Recommendations

Info

D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E S E K K E Njustification. However, some of the value sets provide values that opposeeach other to such an extent that they are antagonistic and hardly compatible.In A&C and DKS, a difficult struggle has been and is, the merging of theromantic self-expression and the skill and knowledge focus.THE COMMON WORLDSTo identify the worlds or value sets, Boltanski and Thévenot analyse writtentexts and establish a difference between several opposing polities, and whatthey see as different worlds for the actors. They are expressed and discussedin these texts and can be given characteristics that make it possible to expressa ‘universal state’, a set of values and attitudes towards the world that will besupported by more than one person ― a ‘community of reference’ that theindividual will partake in through his justification. These six worlds are notabsolute settings in a sense that if one is present the others are not. Although,in a given situation one of them will, through the process of agreement, takeprecedence for the individuals involved, and will guide the search for asolution to a difficult or conflicting situation. The situations will work itselfout through a negotiation of value ― represented by the common worlds ―and the result will be a situated judgment with values that are specific for thatcontext, but at the same time recognisable for others through the commonworld that is located in the agreement. In light of professional boundaries, thepublic’s acceptance of the situated judgement will play a part as well. I willdiscuss this further at a later stage.‘Identifiers’ are used to illuminate different sets of values that might guidethe arguments that arise in an ambiguous situation. The Higher CommonPrinciple is just the first of a list of identifiers. There might be a multitude ofsituated arrangements where transitory and ambiguous situations might arise,and they have listed six different sets of values that they claim have a certainuniversalism in the fact that they are recognisable outside the singleindividual. To isolate the separate worlds that manifest the justificationexecuted in a situation of conflict, Boltanski and Thévenot (2006) havedrawn an outline of the six common worlds. They are not new inventions,according to Boltanski and Thévenot, but rather a bringing together andsystemizing of already existing thoughts about society and the polity.According to them, the six common worlds that they propose are alreadyoutlined in existing texts within theories of political philosophy — narrativesof polity. There might be numerous situations of conflict, but a limited set ofworlds to base reaching agreement on.78
A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R DIdentifiersTo draw the line between the worlds, and give evidence of the difference incharacter, they present us with descriptions of a set of identifiers.1. Higher common principleThe higher common principle (HCP) tells of what is considered good. It isthe goal to attain, and the guiding ideal of the group. This is recognisedthrough characteristics in the form of State of Worthiness.2. State of WorthinessState of Worthiness (SoW) is how the HCP is given voice and shape inhuman-beings and thing-beings ― what is recognised as ‘holy’ or as ‘usefulcapital’. How do you behave to be recognised among the group as a membervoicing the HCP? What do you value in your possessions?3. Human DignityWhat is prized as forms of behaviour? What drives the work/choices madewithin the group?4. List of SubjectsWho are seen as the guiding subjects, the leading thinkers? How is the worldstructured in terms of organisation? Who and how is someone recognised as afigure of authority?5. List of Objects and ArrangementsWhat are the central objects or happenings that define the actor’s inclusion inthe group HCP?6. Investment FormulaWhat are the important words and actions that an actor invests, to prove he isworthy in the situation?7. Relation of WorthWhat is the ultimate goal of the actor in his choice of actions?8. Natural Relations among BeingsHow do the actors interact? What is the accepted way of going about one’sbusiness?9. Harmonious Figures of the Natural OrderWhat arenas do the HCP unfold in its purer form? Where is the ‘home of theHCP’?10. Model TestsWhat are the important transitory situations where the members reinforcetheir belonging to a world?79
Page 2:
D E N K U L T U R E L L E S K U L E
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 31 and 32:
S T R A T E G Ythere one solution p
Page 33 and 34:
S T R A T E G Yboth aware of this,
Page 35 and 36:
S T R A T E G YAccording to Yin, it
Page 37 and 38: S T R A T E G Yproductions of these
Page 39 and 40: S T R A T E G Ypsychology, and is c
Page 41 and 42: S T R A T E G Ytheir beliefs, desir
Page 43 and 44: S T R A T E G Ynarratives within th
Page 45 and 46: F I N D I N G D O C U M E N T A T I
Page 59 and 60: T H E ’ S C H O O L W O R L D ’
Page 79 and 80: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
Page 87: A G R E E M E N T A N D D I S C O R
Page 97 and 98: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SThe
Page 101 and 102: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sfind
Page 103 and 104: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sbe a
Page 105 and 106: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SAnot
Page 107 and 108: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E S“
Page 109 and 110: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sstat
Page 111 and 112: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Ssucc
Page 113 and 114: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E SIt i
Page 115 and 116: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Steac
Page 117 and 118: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sin e
Page 119 and 120: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E STher
Page 123 and 124: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Sshe
Page 125 and 126: T H E D K S N A R R A T I V E Screa
Page 127 and 128: S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
Page 139 and 140:
S H I F T I N G B O U N D A R I E S
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
E S T A B L I S H I N G A M Y T H ?
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
T H E M Y T H E X P O S E Doriented
Page 169 and 170:
T H E M Y T H E X P O S E Dprogram.
Page 171 and 172:
T H E M Y T H E X P O S E Dmight be
Page 173 and 174:
B I B L I O G R A P H YBénatouïl,
Page 175 and 176:
B I B L I O G R A P H YBumgarner, C
Page 177 and 178:
B I B L I O G R A P H YConference,
Page 179 and 180:
B I B L I O G R A P H YHaabesland,
Page 181 and 182:
B I B L I O G R A P H YKlafki, Wolf
Page 183 and 184:
B I B L I O G R A P H YLied, Edith.
Page 185 and 186:
B I B L I O G R A P H YEducation. T
Page 187 and 188:
B I B L I O G R A P H YSchjønsby,
Page 189 and 190:
B I B L I O G R A P H YThavenius, J
show all

CON â¢ TEXT - Arkitektur- og designhÃ¸gskolen i Oslo - AHO

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

CON â¢ TEXT - Arkitektur- og designhÃ¸gskolen i Oslo - AHO