COMMENTARYTetrem Capital Management<strong>CI</strong> Canadian Investment FundA confluence of negative news items in January and February(Chinese monetary tightening, Greek debt crisis, slowingrate of growth in earnings) led equity markets around theworld to face one of their more serious downdrafts since thestock market recovery began in <strong>March</strong> 2009. The “minicorrection”of 7%-8% in Canada and the U.S. was shortlived,however, and both markets came back strongly in<strong>March</strong> and finished up for the quarter.During the quarter, <strong>CI</strong> Canadian Investment Fund rose2.7%, while the S&P/TSX Composite Index was up 3.1%.Within Canada, all sectors rose, with the exception ofenergy, which declined 0.6%, due mostly to the sharp dropin natural gas prices. Natural gas is notoriously volatile in theshort term and, at the moment, there is more supply thandemand as a result of a mild winter and depressed industrialproduction. We expect demand to pick up as conditionsnormalize.On the positive side, our performance was driven by stocksin the consumer discretionary, financial, and industrialsectors – at a high level, cyclical names continued to rallythanks to increased confidence in the economic recovery.This was offset by our exposure to the energy sector, wherewe continue to be slightly overweight relative to the index.The U.S. equity portion contributed positively during thequarter, rising 7.3%, while the international componentlagged, rising 0.24%.There is controversy about whether equity market valuationshave gotten ahead of themselves. The Canadian markethas now rallied approximately 60% from its <strong>March</strong> 2009lows, and much of the rally has been in anticipation of aneconomic recovery and rebound in corporate profits. Nowthat the recovery is occurring, the question is whether or notit will be strong enough to support further advances in stockprices. In our opinion, there are good reasons to believe thereis still upside. Corporations have been proactive in reducingtheir cost structure and deferring capital expenditures toprotect cash flow. The benefits of these cost savings areexpected to continue into the future and, therefore, thesecompanies stand to benefit from operating leverage asrevenues increase. We think that profits could surprise tothe upside and this is not yet reflected in valuations acrossthe market.We will be watching the upcoming earnings season forNorth American railways, which responded quickly to therecession by laying off employees and shuttering locomotivesand cars. The rail companies have stated that many of thecost reductions will be permanent – if this proves to be true,they would be expected to deliver higher levels of profitabilityassuming stable pricing, business mix, and distance travelled.In other words, if the rails are able to generate “good times”revenues with a cost structure that has been downsized forbad times, the results could pleasantly surprise shareholders.U.S. & Canadian Rails: Originated Weekly Total CarloadsYoY % Change0.10.050-0.05-0.1-0.15-0.2-0.25Source: AAR, BMO CMTotal 13WMA YoY% ChangeMay 06Aug 06Nov 06Feb 07Jun 07Sep 07Dec 07Mar 08Jun 08Oct 08Jan 09Apr 09Jul 09Oct 09Feb 10Chart 1: Carload volumes for the largest North American railwayshave rebounded strongly, helping to drive their share prices higher.PAGE 44 • SPRING 2010 PERSPECTIVE AS AT MARCH 31, 2010
COMMENTARYWe own shares in CN Rail, CP Rail, and Norfolk Southernin our Canadian and U.S. portfolios. So far in 2010,carload volumes for the Big Six North American rails haverebounded more strongly than many had originally expected(See Chart 1), which explains the recent surge in the stocks.CAE is an aerospace name we recently added to ourCanadian portfolios. The company is a global leader in themanufacture of flight simulators for pilot training in boththe commercial aviation and defence sectors. We purchasedCAE at well below its historical mid-cycle valuation (SeeChart 2) when investors feared a prolonged downturn in theaerospace market. This fear seemed overblown, and we arenow seeing airlines place new orders with Boeing and Airbus– a big change from last year when the news was dominatedby order cancellations. In the long run, strong demand forCAE’s commercial flight simulators should be driven byseveral factors: replacement of aging fleets, new pilot hiresdue to accelerating retirements and increased global airtraffic. As earnings visibility improves, we believe the stockshould rally as investors become willing to value CAE onfuture results that are likely to be much improved.In our U.S. portfolios, we added Qualcomm in Februaryat a very attractive valuation after investors had punishedthe stock for temporarily weak near-term results, sendingit down approximately 28% from early January to lateFebruary. The company had missed earnings expectationsdue to lower-than-expected average selling prices, whichface long-term downward pressure. Investors appeared tobelieve the magnitude of average selling price declines goingforward would be more severe than originally thought. Wehad done our work on the stock and saw the controversy asoverblown, which created a buying opportunity. Aside fromthe compelling valuation, our confidence was supportedby the fact that Qualcomm owns key patents on wirelesstechnologies (3G, 4G) that are likely to experience longtermgrowth, more than offsetting the average selling pricedeclines. The company has a strong balance sheet, generatessignificant free cash flow and the stock trades well belowour estimate of the company’s intrinsic value. Out ofinterest, shortly after we took an initial position in the stock,the company announced a new $3 billion stock buybackCAE Inc. Valuation at an Attractive Discount to History18.0016.0014.0012.0010.008.006.004.002.000.00Apr 05Jul 05Oct 05Jan 06Apr 06Jul 06Oct 06Jan 07Apr 07Jul 07Oct 07Jan 08Apr 08Jul 08Oct 08Jan 09Apr 09Jul 09Oct 09Jan 10Source: Capital IQ, Tetrem Capital Managementand raised the dividend by 12%, two actions that indicatemanagement is intent on delivering value to shareholders.As was the case last quarter, our portfolios have a cyclicalbias – for now. We have been favouring names in sectorssuch as consumer discretionary (retail, auto parts, media),industrials (transports, aerospace), and energy (naturalgas, services). The overweight position in energy is alsosupported by our view that the long-term demand outlookis strong. Notwithstanding our pro-cyclical positioning, wesee opportunities emerging among companies, with stableearnings characteristics, that have lagged the overall market’sadvance. As the portfolio’s cyclical stocks approach fair value,we intend to harvest gains and will likely plough them backinto these undervalued defensive names.Manager: Daniel BubisEV/EBITDA (trailing 12 months)EV/EBITDA (average)Chart 2: CAE, a maker of flight simulators for commercial aviationand defence, is trading at a discount to its historical valuations. Thisreflects fears of a prolonged downturn in the aerospace industry butfails to reflect other long-term factors driving the company`s growth.Analysts: Ben Boult, Aaron Clark, Alec MacIsaac,Steve Maksymyk, Eileen MuellerPAGE 45 • SPRING 2010 PERSPECTIVE AS AT MARCH 31, 2010
- Page 5: Signature Reportof the average bond
- Page 8 and 9: Signature ReportSignature Diversifi
- Page 10: Signature ReportMarket RoundupGloba
- Page 13 and 14: Signature ReportHealth careTechnolo
- Page 15 and 16: Signature ReportHigh-yield bondsGeo
- Page 17 and 18: Sterling’sWorld ReportIs Greece a
- Page 19 and 20: Sterling’sWorld Reportof only 3.7
- Page 22 and 23: Spotlight onStephen JenkinsGood man
- Page 24 and 25: Spotlight onStephen JenkinsHarbourF
- Page 26 and 27: Spotlight onStephen JenkinsAryzta A
- Page 28 and 29: Harbour Growth & Income FundHarbour
- Page 30 and 31: Balanced OpportunitiesFundHarbour G
- Page 32 and 33: CI IncomeOpportunities -Fund Highli
- Page 34 and 35: Reprinted with permission from The
- Page 36 and 37: COMMENTARYCambridge AdvisorsMost of
- Page 38 and 39: COMMENTARYFor the income portfolios
- Page 40 and 41: COMMENTARYquarters, the backdrop fo
- Page 42 and 43: COMMENTARYinventories throughout th
- Page 44 and 45: COMMENTARYEpoch Investment Partners
- Page 48 and 49: COMMENTARYLegg Mason Capital Manage
- Page 50 and 51: COMMENTARYAltrinsic Global Advisors
- Page 52 and 53: pressure, investors will be searchi
- Page 54 and 55: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 56 and 57: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 58 and 59: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 60 and 61: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 62 and 63: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 64 and 65: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 66 and 67: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 68 and 69: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 70 and 71: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 72 and 73: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 74 and 75: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 76 and 77: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 78 and 79: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 80 and 81: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 82 and 83: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 84 and 85: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 86 and 87: CI Funds ® LEAD MANAGERCDN $FUND C
- Page 88 and 89: CI Corporate ClassLEAD MANAGERCDN $
- Page 90 and 91: Labour-sponsored FundsLEAD MANAGERC
- Page 92 and 93: CI Segregated FundsIssued by Unity
- Page 94 and 95: Clarica PortfolioSegregated FundsIs
- Page 96 and 97:
SunWise ® I FundsBasic GuaranteeIs
- Page 98 and 99:
SunWise ® II FundsBasic Guarantee
- Page 100 and 101:
SunWise ® II FundsCombined Guarant
- Page 102 and 103:
SunWise ® II FundsCombined Guarant
- Page 104 and 105:
SunWise ® II FundsFull Guarantee c
- Page 106 and 107:
SunWise ® Elite FundsBasic Guarant
- Page 108 and 109:
SunWise ® Elite FundsCombined Guar
- Page 110 and 111:
CI Sales TeamNeal KerrSenior Vice-P
- Page 112:
2009Analysts’ ChoiceInvestment Fu