COMMENTARYAltrinsic Global Advisors, LLCGlobal equity markets delivered strong performance duringthe first quarter, reflecting investors’ growing confidence inthe pace of economic recovery and strengthening corporateprofits. This improving sentiment, supported by stimulativemonetary and fiscal policies, has outweighed countervailingforces of excessive government and private sector leverage,weak end demand, high unemployment, high oil prices,and the fragile property and financial sectors. It remainsto be seen whether sustainable economic drivers will takeover from this policy stimulus. At the company-specificlevel, the balance sheets of many non-financial companiesare quite strong, and the pace of restructuring has beenimpressive. With cash balances among major companiesnear historically high levels, prudent management teams arepoised to allocate cash flow to the benefit of shareholdersvia higher dividends, buybacks, or sensible acquisitions.We believe that companies with these characteristicsoffer the greatest sources of value and long-term upside.Highly leveraged companies, generally the best-performingstocks during the MS<strong>CI</strong> World Index’s 73% climb from its<strong>March</strong> 2009 bottom, present the greatest risk.Our global and international portfolios outperformedthe MS<strong>CI</strong> World and EAFE indexes during the quarter.Outperformance was overwhelmingly driven by stockselection, with the most favourable attribution derived fromholdings in the technology, financial and industrial sectors.BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Nintendo and Torchmark weremajor gainers. Defensive sectors generally underperformedthe broad markets during the first quarter of 2010 and werea source of slightly negative attribution. From a geographicperspective, holdings in Japanese and Continental Europeancompanies were the major contributors to outperformance,while those in North America and the U.K. adverselyaffected relative performance.Investment Perspectives and Portfolio StrategyAlthough the underlying conditions of the world’s largesteconomies are fragile, the fundamental condition and longterminvestment outlook for equity in corporations is notablycompelling. If the last decade was one of vibrant economicgrowth and disappointing stock-price returns, we could verywell be in a new era of disappointing economic growth andmore prosperous stock returns.Generally speaking, corporations entered this downturn withrelatively strong balance sheets and were ruthless in initiatingcost-cutting and efficiency-gaining measures to adjust forthe challenging environment. The result is an abundanceof well-capitalized companies that are generating substantialfree cash flow, which is likely to be deployed for the benefitof shareholders via dividends, share buybacks, or sensibleacquisitions (as seen in Chart 1). A lack of the supportive,sustained nominal GDP growth experienced during muchof the last decade, coupled with greater alignment betweenmanagement incentives and shareholders, could result in amore investor-friendly deployment of this cash. As investorfocus shifts from cyclical recovery to an assessment ofabsolute levels and sustainability of economic activity,we believe that those companies that can maintain levelsof financial productivity (i.e., return on equity/return oncapital employed) will be differentiated and their associatedvaluation anomalies will be adjusted. Ironically, companieswith these characteristics are trading at attractive valuationlevels, while more highly leveraged companies that haveled markets since the <strong>March</strong> 9, 2009 bottom appear moreexpensively valued. These leveraged businesses offer amuch less favourable trade-off between upside potential anddownside risk.PAGE 48 • SPRING 2010 PERSPECTIVE AS AT MARCH 31, 2010
COMMENTARYAs value investors, we typically find opportunities amongmore esoteric companies, businesses going throughchanges, or those facing temporary headwinds. The currentenvironment, however, appears to be one of those uniqueepisodes where value exists among more recognizable andhigh-quality companies. Not confined to particular industriesor regions, such holdings include Nestlé (Switzerland),Canon (Japan), Principal Financial Group (U.S.), andCisco Systems (U.S.). We certainly have our share ofmore controversial companies, including BioMarin (U.S.),NKSJ Holdings (Japan), Bangkok Bank (Thailand), MitsuiCorporation (Japan), Ubisoft Entertainment (France), andSime Darby (Malaysia). We believe this combination ofcompanies has resulted in a distinctive portfolio that ispoised to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns with a lowercorrelation to broad markets.S&P 500 Average Company % Cash-to-Assets% Cash-to-Assets15.0%14.0%13.0%12.0%11.0%10.0%9.0%8.0%7.0%6.0%198019841988Source: Factset Fundamentals, Altrinsic Research1992Chart 1: U.S. companies have aggressively cut costs and are buildingup cash reserves, which bodes well for shareholder-friendly moveslike acquisitions, increasing dividends and buying back shares.1996200020042008An unintended result of these company-specific investmentsis our overweight exposure to Japan, a slight overweightexposure to Europe, and an underweight exposure to NorthAmerica. Our direct investment in emerging markets is nearour all-time low, reflecting the high valuations and aggressiveexpectations already priced into local shares. In contrastto the conditions that existed 10 years ago, we believe thatcurrently the best means of benefiting from the long-termemerging markets growth story is by investing in high-qualitymultinational companies, including those mentioned above.Much of our European and North American exposureis invested in this type of company. Although our directemerging market exposure is 4% of the portfolio, our effectiveexposure is 24%, which was derived from the proportion ofour holdings’ sales to emerging markets.Our most notable outliers, which are embedded in ourindustry exposures, include an overweight position inEuropean multinational consumer franchises, Japanesefinancials, and Japanese industrial companies. Notableunderweight exposures include financials (particularly inEurope), telecommunications and utilities. Our exposure totechnology companies is near its all-time high, and we havebeen further adding to quality franchises in the health caresector.Given the relative strength of company-specific fundamentals,we believe the greatest risks reside at the sovereign level andamong those highly leveraged companies that led marketperformance from the <strong>March</strong> 2009 lows. As the balancesheets and credit quality of Western nations remain underPAGE 49 • SPRING 2010 PERSPECTIVE AS AT MARCH 31, 2010
- Page 5: Signature Reportof the average bond
- Page 8 and 9: Signature ReportSignature Diversifi
- Page 10: Signature ReportMarket RoundupGloba
- Page 13 and 14: Signature ReportHealth careTechnolo
- Page 15 and 16: Signature ReportHigh-yield bondsGeo
- Page 17 and 18: Sterling’sWorld ReportIs Greece a
- Page 19 and 20: Sterling’sWorld Reportof only 3.7
- Page 22 and 23: Spotlight onStephen JenkinsGood man
- Page 24 and 25: Spotlight onStephen JenkinsHarbourF
- Page 26 and 27: Spotlight onStephen JenkinsAryzta A
- Page 28 and 29: Harbour Growth & Income FundHarbour
- Page 30 and 31: Balanced OpportunitiesFundHarbour G
- Page 32 and 33: CI IncomeOpportunities -Fund Highli
- Page 34 and 35: Reprinted with permission from The
- Page 36 and 37: COMMENTARYCambridge AdvisorsMost of
- Page 38 and 39: COMMENTARYFor the income portfolios
- Page 40 and 41: COMMENTARYquarters, the backdrop fo
- Page 42 and 43: COMMENTARYinventories throughout th
- Page 44 and 45: COMMENTARYEpoch Investment Partners
- Page 46 and 47: COMMENTARYTetrem Capital Management
- Page 48 and 49: COMMENTARYLegg Mason Capital Manage
- Page 52 and 53: pressure, investors will be searchi
- Page 54 and 55: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 56 and 57: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 58 and 59: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 60 and 61: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 62 and 63: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 64 and 65: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 66 and 67: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 68 and 69: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 70 and 71: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 72 and 73: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 74 and 75: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 76 and 77: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 78 and 79: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 80 and 81: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 82 and 83: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 84 and 85: Fund Factsas at March 31, 2010Fund
- Page 86 and 87: CI Funds ® LEAD MANAGERCDN $FUND C
- Page 88 and 89: CI Corporate ClassLEAD MANAGERCDN $
- Page 90 and 91: Labour-sponsored FundsLEAD MANAGERC
- Page 92 and 93: CI Segregated FundsIssued by Unity
- Page 94 and 95: Clarica PortfolioSegregated FundsIs
- Page 96 and 97: SunWise ® I FundsBasic GuaranteeIs
- Page 98 and 99: SunWise ® II FundsBasic Guarantee
- Page 100 and 101:
SunWise ® II FundsCombined Guarant
- Page 102 and 103:
SunWise ® II FundsCombined Guarant
- Page 104 and 105:
SunWise ® II FundsFull Guarantee c
- Page 106 and 107:
SunWise ® Elite FundsBasic Guarant
- Page 108 and 109:
SunWise ® Elite FundsCombined Guar
- Page 110 and 111:
CI Sales TeamNeal KerrSenior Vice-P
- Page 112:
2009Analysts’ ChoiceInvestment Fu