12.07.2015 Views

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 Analysis of TINo";'sThe more contentious questions arise when weE. Effec/s on come to deal with the effects of crop fluctuationsnon-agrimJ/tI- on industries not utilising agricultural raw materials.raj consllmers' These may be divided for convenience into congoodssumers' goods industries <strong>and</strong> producers' goodsindmlries. industries, or again into industries serving theagricultural population <strong>and</strong> industries serving thenonagricultural population. It may fairly be assumed that, exceptin advanced phases of expansion, the elasticity of supply ofgoodsin face of an increase in the money dem<strong>and</strong> is considerable.The effect ofa big harvest on non-agricultural consumers' goodsindustries will depend on whether the money dem<strong>and</strong> for consumers'goods of agricultural origin is elastic or not. The lesselastic it is the more probable it is that the big harvest <strong>and</strong> theconsequent fall in the price of food will result in a diversion ofdem<strong>and</strong> from food to non-agricultural goods, inducing a rise inthe supply of the latter, the extent of which depends on supplyconditions. The same is true, ifill/a/is mllt<strong>and</strong>is, of poor harvests.While there may be a general tendency for cropF. Farmers' chang~s to affect non-agricultural consumers' goodsptlreha.ring industries as a whole in a given direction, a distinc·power. tion must be made between those which supply the .agricultural population <strong>and</strong> those which supply thenon-agricultural population. It is often asserted that changes inagricultural output affect general business by changing the pur·chasing power ofthe agriculturist. Good harvests either increaseor diminish the farmer's income, according as .the elasticity ofdem<strong>and</strong> is greater or less than unity, <strong>and</strong> so affect the prosperityof the branches of indus4Y which serve his· needs. It is clear,however, that this.argument in itself proves nothing. For whatthe farmer loses in purchasing power other people are bound togain, <strong>and</strong> "ice tler.ra. Business Bags in the case of the industriessupplying the farmer, b~t is brisk in the case of the industriessupplying other people. ,"The net result of this redistribution ofpurchasing power will depend on the concrete situation,the phase of the trade cycle, the credit situation· in thevarious countries <strong>and</strong> lo~ities affected by the redistribution, <strong>and</strong>so on.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!