12.07.2015 Views

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chap. II The Up-turn .. Revival 401increased-though net profits will still be negative, since the grossprofits do not cover amortisation of the fixed capital-<strong>and</strong> there istherefore scope for increased hoarding or repayment ofbank loans.This is afortiori the case where there is not free competition in thestrict sense of economic theory, <strong>and</strong> prices under monopolisticor quasi-monopolistic conditions (or simply as a result of frictionor fear of spoiling the marke~) are prevented from falling to thepoint of equality with marginal cost-in other words, whereproducers fail to exp<strong>and</strong> production up to the point at whichmarginal cost equals price.We conclude, therefore, that the freer the competition <strong>and</strong>the more flexible the price the greater the favourable effect ofwage reductions <strong>and</strong> the smaller the danger of an intensificationof deflation. That conclusion is no more nor less· thanwas to be expected. It does not follow, however, that such anintensification of the hoarding process. as a consequence of awage reduction is impossible, even under competition in thestrictest sense.Suppose employment <strong>and</strong> output in a particularRBpermssions industry to have been somewhat increased in reonother sponse to a fall in money wages, but not by so muchindustries. as wages have been reduced, sb that there resultsa decrease in the disbursements of wages by theindustry in question. This increase in employment <strong>and</strong> outputis certainly desirable: but we have also to take into considerationthe effect on other industries. This depends on what happens tothe increased (gross) profits. Suppose a part of them is hoarded.Then dem<strong>and</strong> for other products will be reduced, 1 <strong>and</strong> the increasein employment in the industry directly concerned will be partly orwholly offset by a decrease somewhere else. This may evenreact back on the first industry <strong>and</strong> partly nullify there the originalincrease in empl9yment.1 Of course, an increase in wage disbursements need not result in aninstantaneous increase in dem<strong>and</strong> for wage goods~ since the wage-earnermay hoard part of it or use it for repaying debts. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, adecrease may be temporarily offset by drawing on hoards or incurringdebts. We disregard these factors here as being quantitativelyunimportant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!