12.07.2015 Views

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chap. 3 The Over-investment Theories 57savings. 1 If they do occur, evil consequences· must be expected,even in the absence ofcredit inflation. (We shall see, in connectionwith the discussion ofother theories, that there are numerous otherdisturbances possible which may interrupt the upswing <strong>and</strong>start a vicious spiral downward-disturbances which are probablyof the same, or even of a higher, order of magnitude than thefluctuations in the rate of forced or voluntary saving discussedabove.) -To sum up, we may say that the theory has not proved rigorouslythat a stabilisation of prices in a progressive economy mustalways lead to over-production, crisis <strong>and</strong> depression. 2 Thepractical importance of this conclusion is considerable in view ofthe American prosperity in the twenties, a notable feature of whichwas the fact that wholesale prices did not rise.§ 5. THE DOWNSWINGThe theory of the depression is not nearly soThe depression fully elaborated by the authors of the monetaryas It period over-investment school as the theory of the boom.of readjust- The depression was originally conceived of by themmente as a process of adjustment of the structure of production,<strong>and</strong> was. explained in non-monetary terms.During the boom, they argued, the process ofproduction is undulyelongated. This elongation has accordingly to be removed <strong>and</strong>the structure of production has to be shortened or, alternatively,expenditure on consumers' goods must be reduced (by retrenchmentof wages <strong>and</strong> other incomes which are likely to be spent1 Ct. C. Bresciani-Turroni, II The Thee>ty of Saving" in Economica, 1936,pages 165 et seq.• The following statement of a prominent adherent of the monetaryover-investment theory is significant: "This theory does not makethe pretence of being the only explanation of all cycles <strong>and</strong> crises thathave ever occurred, nor does it pretend that it states unconditionalnecessities" (F. MachIup, "Professor Knight <strong>and</strong> the 'Period ofProduction' " in Journal ot :Political Economy, Vol. 43, October 1935.page 622.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!