12.07.2015 Views

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

Prosperity and Depression.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chap. 8Recent Discussions on the Trade CycleSecondly, these theories' suffer from the factDifferences in that their authors have not been able to make cleat interminology all cases whether apparent differences between theirversus views <strong>and</strong> those of other writers rest on differentdifferences in empirical assumptions or only on a different usagesubstance. of terms; in other words, whether differences are ofa material kind or ofa purely terminological nature.There can be no doubt that,in recent years, the discussions onsaving<strong>and</strong> investment <strong>and</strong> the possibility of their being unequal, onhoarding, liquidity-preference <strong>and</strong> the rate ofinterest, <strong>and</strong> similartopics, have made it increasingly evident that purely verbal misunderst<strong>and</strong>ings<strong>and</strong> slight,differences in the definition of terms haveplayed a very great role. l ' The exaggerated impression ofimportancewhich prevailed with respect to the real (as against purelyterminological) 'differences between different schools of thought,especially between what some writers 2 like to call the " classical "<strong>and</strong> the " modern " view, has already been modified. But it issafe to assume that this process of terminological clarification isnot yet completed, <strong>and</strong> it is hoped that the present chapter will doa. little to hasten it.Even in those instances where the new theories amount tonothing more than a terminological innovation <strong>and</strong> cannot be saidto be in material contradiction to the traditional views, they havesometimes served a useful purpose, by, bringing to light hiddenimplications in the older theoretical schemes <strong>and</strong> forcing thepropounders of " rival" theories to make all their assumptionsclear <strong>and</strong> explicit.All this will be illustrated in the following sections.1 Professor Robertson has recently made an attempt at separatingterminological from substantial differences. Ct." A Survey of ModernMonetary Controversy" in The Manchester School, Vol. 9. No. I, April1938.I Ct., for example, A. P. Lerner: U Alternative Formulations of theTheory of Interest" in the Economic Journal, Vol. 48, June 1938, passim.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!