12.07.2015 Views

The Impact of the Andean Trade Preference Act Twelfth ... - USITC

The Impact of the Andean Trade Preference Act Twelfth ... - USITC

The Impact of the Andean Trade Preference Act Twelfth ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fresh-cut rosesU.S. imports <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut roses in 2005 were dutiable at <strong>the</strong> NTR rate <strong>of</strong> 6.8 percent advalorem. Such imports were dutiable at <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> 3.4 percent for Chile and Singapore under<strong>the</strong> FTAs with those countries, and 6.1 percent for Australia under its FTA. Fresh-cut roseimports were eligible for duty-free treatment under ATPA, CBERA, NAFTA, <strong>the</strong> AfricanGrowth and Opportunity <strong>Act</strong>, and FTAs with Israel and Jordan. Imports <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut rosesare not eligible for duty-free entry under GSP.In 2005, U.S. sales <strong>of</strong> domestically produced roses fell to 100 million stems, valued at $39million, from 104 million stems, valued at $42 million, <strong>the</strong> previous year. 172 This patterncontinued <strong>the</strong> downward trend in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> U.S. domestic production <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut rosesthat began in <strong>the</strong> late 1980s as imported roses entered <strong>the</strong> United States in increasingquantities. Although <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> both U.S.-grown and imported roses increased slightly in2005 over 2004, imported prices remained lower than those <strong>of</strong> U.S. roses. 173Imports <strong>of</strong> roses from all sources accounted for 86 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> U.S. consumption<strong>of</strong> roses in 2005, up from 83 percent <strong>the</strong> previous year. Imports from ATPA countries in2005 supplied 84 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> U.S. consumption, compared with 79 percent <strong>of</strong> itsvalue in 2004. 174 Colombia was <strong>the</strong> leading supplier, with imports from that countryaccounting for 60 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> U.S. consumption in 2005. Ecuador was second,with imports accounting for 24 percent <strong>of</strong> total U.S. consumption in 2005.U.S. imports <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut roses from all sources totaled $275 million in 2005, an increase <strong>of</strong>10 percent over <strong>the</strong> previous year. Colombia and Ecuador were <strong>the</strong> leading suppliers,accounting for 69 percent and 27 percent, respectively, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total value in 2005. U.S.imports <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut roses from all ATPA sources totaled $263 million in 2005, an increase<strong>of</strong> 10 percent from <strong>the</strong> previous year, virtually all <strong>of</strong> which entered free <strong>of</strong> duty under ATPA.Colombia supplied 72 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fresh-cut rose imports under <strong>the</strong> ATPA program in2005, and Ecuador accounted for 28 percent. Peru supplied less than 1 percent <strong>of</strong> total roseimports under <strong>the</strong> ATPA program, and no imports <strong>of</strong> roses from Bolivia were entered in2005.Fresh-cut chrysan<strong>the</strong>mums, standard carnations, anthuriums, and orchidsU.S. imports <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut chrysan<strong>the</strong>mums, standard carnations, anthuriums, and orchids(fresh-cut chrysan<strong>the</strong>mums etc.) were dutiable in 2005 at <strong>the</strong> NTR rate <strong>of</strong> 6.4 percent advalorem. Such imports were dutiable at <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> 3.2 percent for Singapore and 4.8 percentfor Australia under <strong>the</strong> FTAs with those countries. Such imports were eligible for duty-freetreatment under <strong>the</strong> GSP (excluding those from Colombia, which exceeded <strong>the</strong> competitiveneedlimit), ATPA, CBERA, NAFTA, and FTAs with Israel, Jordan, and Chile. In 2005,virtually all U.S. imports <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut chrysan<strong>the</strong>mums etc. from ATPA beneficiary countriesentered free <strong>of</strong> duty under <strong>the</strong> ATPA program.172USDA, NASS, Floriculture Crops, 2005 Summary, Apr. 2006.173USDA, ERS, Floriculture and Nursery Crops Outlook, Sept. 2005, p. 12.174Market shares are calculated using all imports <strong>of</strong> fresh-cut roses from ATPA countries, not exclusivelythose that benefit from <strong>the</strong> ATPA program.3-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!