Submitting your Paper to Another Journal.If you are advised that your paper is not appropriatefor the journal to which you have initially submittedit (e.g., it is not sufficiently novel or does nothave the right focus), the best course is usuallyto select another journal. In some cases, you maynot want to inform editors <strong>of</strong> the second journalthat the manuscript was submitted elsewhereand rejected—it might prejudice the process. Forexample, if your paper was rejected by Nature andyou resubmit it to Science (or vice versa), do notlet the editors <strong>of</strong> the second journal know. Thesejournals compete for the best papers and do notwant to publish each other’s rejects. If, however,your paper was reviewed by Nature or Scienceand the reviews were generally positive but theeditor did not feel the paper had a sufficiently highimpact value for a top-tier journal, you may be ableto use the reviewers’ comments as leverage foryour next submission to a field-specific journal thatis not seen as a competitor to those two broaderpublications. Ask the first journal’s editor to supportthe resubmission, and tell the second editorthat your paper has already been reviewed. Thesecond review process may be expedited.Regardless <strong>of</strong> your course <strong>of</strong> action, never send arejected manuscript without changes to a secondjournal. If the same reviewers receive it from thesecond editor, which may well happen if they areespecially well-suited to consider the work, theywill be annoyed to see that you have completelyignored their comments.PUBLISHING HONESTLYThe number <strong>of</strong> publications is <strong>of</strong>ten used as a wayto keep score, with researchers who publish moreviewed as superior. But publishing papers thatare too similar, or that show your work movingonly a fraction <strong>of</strong> a step forward, may lead otherresearchers to view you as a weak scientist.Publishing the same data as more than one paperis not generally acceptable, except in studieswhere the older data is clearly built and expandedwith new work. Even in cases where new workmakes substantial use <strong>of</strong> old data, the norm inresearch papers is usually to cite an earlier paper,not to re-publish material from it. Review articles,which openly gather information from otherpapers, digest it, and present it as a digestedwhole, are different in this way from researchpublications.Substantially re-publishing an entire paper undera new title or in a different language is a form <strong>of</strong>scientific misconduct. While the increasing number<strong>of</strong> publications in the world makes it easierto cheat, increased use <strong>of</strong> electronic formats hasmade duplications easier to detect. While cheatingby republishing is a significant <strong>of</strong>fense, claimingthe work <strong>of</strong> others as your own is a moral andpr<strong>of</strong>essional disaster which can and should endone’s career.What if you make a mistake?Corrections are a normal and acceptable part <strong>of</strong>science. Errata—notes published to alert others tomistakes in the literature—-cover everything fromsmall printing errors such as an out-<strong>of</strong>-place tableto technical errors that skewed results but did notchange the overall message <strong>of</strong> the paper. Retractionsare more serious: they withdraw a paperfrom the literature because <strong>of</strong> a gross failure thatrenders the paper’s contents invalid or seriouslytainted. Retractions are embarrassing, but overtime, an honest, careful researcher can recoverfrom having had a paper retracted.132 excellence everywhere
PROMOTING YOUR WORKYour patience and persistence have paid <strong>of</strong>f, andyour article has been accepted by a good journal.Now you can use your newly minted publicationas a tool in a legitimate effort at self-promotion.You want to become known to your scientificcolleagues nationwide. Here are some things youcan do to promote your work:n Announce the publication on your personal Website and in email correspondence with your friends.Consider making it available in PDF format on yourWeb site, if that is acceptable to the journal. Manyjournals now also allow you to distribute PDFcopies <strong>of</strong> papers to interested individual readers asyou once would have done with paper reprints.n Give a workshop at your own institution on theresearch described in your article and your futureresearch plans. Doing so is relatively easy and isgood practice.n Call your friends at universities around the countryor region and <strong>of</strong>fer to give a talk on your researchat their institutions or at conferences they areorganizing. However, do not invite yourself to ameeting by writing to the organizers if you do notknow them. You might come across as arrogantand put people in the awkward position <strong>of</strong> having toturn you down.n Once you have an invitation, take it seriously.Prepare and rehearse your talk.n Consider going public. Contact your institution’spublic relations <strong>of</strong>fice, if there is one, for helpcontacting the media. It is in the university’sinterest to have the good work <strong>of</strong> its scientistspublicized.n If your research was supported by an outside funder,let the appropriate staff at the funding organizationknow about the publication as soon as possible.n If a reporter contacts you, make an effort to speakwith him or her. Your university’s public relations<strong>of</strong>fice can help you prepare for the interview. Keepin mind that many reporters are not scientists andyou will need to give them sufficient backgroundto understand the importance <strong>of</strong> your work. If possible,ask reporters to give you a copy <strong>of</strong> the storybefore it is published so that you can check foraccuracy. While some feature writers will respondpositively, most news reporters will turn down thisrequest. It never hurts to ask, though.increasing your impact: getting published133
- Page 3 and 4:
A R e s o u r c e f o r S c i e n t
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsVII119PrefaceChapt
- Page 7:
135 Chapter 10E x p a n d i n g Y o
- Page 15 and 16:
Q u e s t i o nq&aWhat Is a “Tenu
- Page 17:
preparing for immediate submission,
- Page 22 and 23:
Practicing the Talkn Practice your
- Page 24 and 25:
your one-on-one interviews you have
- Page 26 and 27:
If talking directly about money is
- Page 28 and 29:
When the institution responds and y
- Page 30 and 31:
equipment and supplies. Maintenance
- Page 32 and 33:
Q u e s t i o nq&aIs your instituti
- Page 34 and 35:
Working With Human SubjectsWhether
- Page 36 and 37:
RESPONSIBILITIES BEYONDTHE LABORATO
- Page 38 and 39:
UNDERSTANDING YOURINSTITUTION AND H
- Page 40:
Criteria for PromotionStructure of
- Page 45 and 46:
Q u e s t i o nWhat’s in a Name?q
- Page 47 and 48:
Screening ApplicantsWhen you review
- Page 50 and 51:
Interpersonal Skillsn How important
- Page 52 and 53:
Multinational Organizations are hir
- Page 54 and 55:
n If there is an office that handle
- Page 57 and 58:
n Seek funding and publish papers (
- Page 59 and 60:
In fact, even though you yourself h
- Page 61 and 62:
n Craft a statement that you feel c
- Page 63 and 64:
n When you delegate authority to so
- Page 65 and 66:
n Use only pens, preferably with wa
- Page 67 and 68:
Strategy sessionsShould you decide
- Page 69 and 70:
Finding Good Papers for Journal Clu
- Page 71 and 72:
If possible, invite people in your
- Page 73 and 74:
Q u e s t i o nq&aHow do I avoid po
- Page 75 and 76:
The International Committee of Medi
- Page 77 and 78:
Managing Conflictin the LabConflict
- Page 79 and 80:
steps for dealing with conflictWhen
- Page 81 and 82:
chapter 5managing your time“ Succ
- Page 83 and 84:
Check your work: the 90-year though
- Page 85 and 86:
n Make and keep appointments with y
- Page 87 and 88:
n Help them seek advice without tak
- Page 89 and 90:
FAMILY MATTERSMany scientists face
- Page 91 and 92: chapter 6project management“ We m
- Page 93 and 94: My project is to get a grant funded
- Page 95: ObjectivesObjectives are the end re
- Page 98 and 99: The key events schedule and the act
- Page 100 and 101: Microsoft Project, a program that s
- Page 102 and 103: Martin, Vivien. Managing Projects i
- Page 104 and 105: appendix II: Example of a Work Brea
- Page 106 and 107: appendix iv: Example of a Gantt Cha
- Page 108 and 109: e h i n d c l o s e d d o o r s :w
- Page 110 and 111: Who might be interested in supporti
- Page 112 and 113: Call your program officerProgram of
- Page 114 and 115: direct costs vs. indirect costsDire
- Page 116 and 117: RESOURCESAllen, Ernest M. “Why ar
- Page 118 and 119: the next generation of students (th
- Page 120 and 121: Seek Feedback through a Formal Peer
- Page 122 and 123: Encouraging Student Questionsn Do n
- Page 124 and 125: Here are some ways you can help the
- Page 126 and 127: n Are there curriculum changes unde
- Page 128 and 129: a relaxed format for talking about
- Page 130 and 131: spend in preparing an effective cou
- Page 132 and 133: The Publishing ProcessTypes of Jour
- Page 134 and 135: A word about impact factorsThe impa
- Page 136 and 137: C r e a t i n g a n i n t e g r a t
- Page 138 and 139: may need to take the first author p
- Page 140 and 141: submitting image filesToday, most i
- Page 144 and 145: RESOURCESDavis, Martha. Scientific
- Page 146 and 147: increase your impact as a scientist
- Page 148 and 149: Q u e s t i o nq&aHow do I communic
- Page 150 and 151: n Offer criticism and correction in
- Page 152 and 153: It is important to discuss career g
- Page 154 and 155: When Mentoring,Advisory, or Supervi
- Page 156 and 157: For researchers in developing count
- Page 158 and 159: n Is travel safe and convenient, or
- Page 160 and 161: n The expected contribution of each
- Page 162 and 163: Meetings. Set up systems to ensure
- Page 164 and 165: SPECIAL CHALLENGESFOR THE BEGINNING
- Page 166 and 167: e an important connection to future
- Page 168 and 169: The invention of a new method or pr
- Page 170 and 171: licensee, who can charge others for
- Page 172 and 173: Most profound for developing countr
- Page 174 and 175: Finally, the patents have been chal
- Page 176 and 177: And, India benefited as a supplier
- Page 178 and 179: paperwork involved in purchasing1.
- Page 180 and 181: labeling mattersA case in point: In
- Page 182 and 183: equipment, freeze-drying equipment,
- Page 184 and 185: Responsibilityfor materialsIf an or
- Page 186 and 187: Recent Improvementsin Materials Tra
- Page 188 and 189: “Knowledge is power.” —Sir Fr
- Page 190 and 191: MOUMemorandum of UnderstandingRFPRe
- Page 192 and 193:
notes continued182 excellence every
- Page 194:
notes continued184 excellence every