expanding agriculture and food security activities in ... - part - usaid

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Farmer familiarity with the commodity Geographic Areas within the three Equatoria States: • Security: The situation in Southern Sudan is still volatile and ever changing with respect to security, and poses problems for project implementers and their ability to access project sites. • Agricultural potential: Project sites should be selected based on their high agricultural potential in order to have the best chance for successfully and profitably increasing surplus production. • Proximity to sizeable markets: Project sites should not be so distant from markets (either in actual distance, or in time it takes to travel to markets, despite actual distance) as to make it cost ineffective to produce surpluses for the market. These markets should have sufficient population in the market shed to have a sizeable demand for agricultural products, thus providing incentives to producers for surplus production. • No duplication: − ensure that there is no duplication/overlap of same/similar activities in same geographic area. The USAID project may be in the same counties as other similar projects, but may cover different payams and bomas. − The USAID project may be located where other agriculture projects are being implemented, but USAID’s activity will be adding value and not duplicating other project efforts. For example, many projects work on production, but not on marketing, market linkages, private sector business development. ii. Tentative Geographic Areas and Commodities Based on these criteria and on discussions held with government officials at State and local levels, the team proposes the following: Geographic Focus • Central Equatoria Counties: Morobo, Kajo Keji, Yei • Eastern Equatoria Counties: Magwi, Ikotos, Budi • Western Equatoria Counties: Maridi, Mundri, Tambura (if security permits) Commodity and Programmatic Focus In line with the options outlined in accordance with HHL and LLL development domains it is recommended to focus on a combination of selected food staple crops, oilseeds, cash crops, livestock, market development and feeder roads. Suggested commodities are: • Ground nuts • Sorghum • Rice • Cassava • Maize • Sesame • Livestock • Horticulture EXPANDING AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY ACTIVITIES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN 26
3. Approaches: • Market-led production. While many of the selected crops are currently for own consumption, it is critical that productivity increases will be competitive in end markets. The initial target markets may be local (town) or Juba, but many commodities have the potential for eventual export to neighboring countries. The initial objectives should be to increase productivity, and meet the quality demanded by the Sudanese markets. In the future, work would need to focus on meeting African regional standards in order to export within the region. • Promote, develop and support businesses all through the selected value chains in order to achieve sustainability. Identify and build on incentives for private service providers to become involved in agriculture. • Use innovative business models to identify incentives for actors along the value chain to improve their performance and to link to other actors (e.g., provide services to non-traditional clients) in the value chain to enhance sustainability. • Women’s participation. This project will work with both men and women. But it puts a particular emphasis on ensuring that women have equitable access to project benefits – training, finance, marketing, technologies, etc. because of the important role they play in agricultural and marketing systems. • Youth will soon dominate the demographics of the population. Most lack the interest and skills in farming. There is a need to remove the stigma of farming as dirty work, and to demonstrate the profitability of farming as a business. School age children should be a prime target for exposure to agriculture. • Partnership approach at all levels during project design, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. This is particularly important at the local and community levels. • Implementation at the County level. GOSS priority is for focusing on implementation and capacity building at State, County and lower levels. • Producer organizations will be used as the entry point for reaching large numbers of farmers. There are many organizations already in existence – as associations, self help groups, cooperatives. The project will aim to increase groups’ abilities to understand farming as a business, including how to be competitive in markets (input and output). Literacy and numeracy training will likely be required. • Judicious use of grants/soft loans: Time-bound small grants, soft loans or starter packs may be necessary to share risk and to kick start activities that will in time become fully commercial. These subsidies should be provided before or after the point of actual commercial transaction to the extent possible to limit market distortions. It is imperative that the exit strategy is clearly developed prior to implementing these non-sustainable interventions. • Public private partnerships, including larger scale commercial investments/contract farming, information dissemination technologies, market infrastructure development. • Feeder roads. Prioritize critical points along roads linking surplus areas to large markets. The project will link to other organizations rehabilitating roads such as USAID and WFP. • Program flexibility to take advantage of emerging opportunities or discontinue non-performant approaches/interventions. B. Illustrative Expected Results Strategic Objective: Increase Food Production in Targeted Areas of Southern Sudan By the end of the project, it is expected that smallholders will have increased their productivity in the selected commodities, and that production levels have increased beyond household consumption needs. Surpluses are marketed in local and Juba markets. EXPANDING AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY ACTIVITIES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN 27
Page 1 and 2: EXPANDING AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECU
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS ACRONYMS..................
Page 5 and 6: IFAD International Fund for Agricul
Page 7 and 8: sector capacity to provide services
Page 9 and 10: • Public sector officers will und
Page 11 and 12: 1. PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT REPORT USA
Page 13 and 14: The level of poverty is extremely h
Page 15 and 16: when the rains begin later than usu
Page 17 and 18: difficult to transport surpluses to
Page 19 and 20: • Basic education accessible to 8
Page 21 and 22: 2. Past and Current USAID Investmen
Page 23 and 24: iii. Environment USAID helped to bu
Page 25 and 26: • Increasing food supply and redu
Page 27 and 28: Efforts to link increased productiv
Page 29 and 30: Soil fertility. While most official
Page 31 and 32: shelter/plastic cover. The rent cha
Page 33 and 34: literacy are major challenges to de
Page 35: 2. The need to focus In order to de
Page 39 and 40: Component 3: Improve Capacity to Su
Page 41 and 42: Crop farming: Detailed Findings Pri
Page 43 and 44: Livestock policy areas: • Need to
Page 45 and 46: TABLES State/County Population 2008
Page 47 and 48: LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK POPULATION IN T
Page 49 and 50: OTHER DONOR AND INTERNATIONAL ORGAN
Page 51 and 52: Project Issues Addressed - Brief De
Page 53 and 54: Name Organization Email Internation
Page 55 and 56: Dr. John Kanisio, Dir. Gen Planning
Page 57 and 58: Annex 4: References EXPANDING AGRIC
Page 59 and 60: ICARDA News. Alternative Livelihood
Page 61 and 62: DATES: May 4, 2009, May 5, 2009 PAR
Page 63 and 64: DATE: May 4, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Int
Page 65 and 66: DATE: May 5, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Int
Page 67 and 68: DATE: May 8, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Dir
Page 69 and 70: DATE: May 8, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Lee
Page 71 and 72: DATE: May 8, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Foo
Page 73 and 74: DATE: May 10, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Ir
Page 75 and 76: DATE: May 11, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: UN
Page 77 and 78: DATE: May 12, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Ru
Page 83 and 84: − Improved roads to facilitate tr
Page 85 and 86: DATE: May 15, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Ma
Page 87 and 88:
• Census Bureau Food Security Uni
Page 89 and 90:
− Improve quality of Veterinary A
Page 91 and 92:
potential to develop the sector, an
Page 93 and 94:
Working with farmers: • Training
Page 95 and 96:
DATE: May 20, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: H.
Page 97:
DATE: May 27, 2009 PARTICIPANTS: Pe
show all

expanding agriculture and food security activities in ... - part - usaid

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?