(c) the practice has had, is hav<strong>in</strong>g, or will likely have the effect of prevent<strong>in</strong>g or lessen<strong>in</strong>g competitionsubstantially.The Tribunal has held that a supplier may be considered to "control a <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>" if it has sufficient market powerto set prices above competitive levels for a considerable period of time. The Tribunal has <strong>in</strong>dicated that, if a firmhas a very large market share, it will very likely have market power, but considerations such as the number ofcompetitors and their respective market shares, excess capacity <strong>in</strong> the market and ease of entry will also betaken <strong>in</strong>to account.Unfortunately, there is little authority <strong>in</strong> Canada provid<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itive guidance on when a company will be foundto have the degree of market power required to trigger the potential application of these provisions. However, itwould be prudent to have regard to the abuse provisions when a firm's market share is above 40-45%, or whenthe aggregate market share of a small group of firms which arguably might be "jo<strong>in</strong>tly dom<strong>in</strong>ant" exceeds thisthreshold.The CA conta<strong>in</strong>s a non-exhaustive def<strong>in</strong>ition of "anti-competitive acts" and a wide range of conduct, if carriedout for an <strong>in</strong>tentional predatory, exclusionary or discipl<strong>in</strong>ary purpose aga<strong>in</strong>st a competitor, could potentiallyqualify as an anti-competitive act.REFUSAL TO DEALIn addition, the Tribunal may order a supplier to accept a person as a customer if it f<strong>in</strong>ds that (i) the person issubstantially affected <strong>in</strong> its <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> or precluded from carry<strong>in</strong>g on its <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> due to its <strong>in</strong>ability to obta<strong>in</strong>adequate supplies of a product anywhere <strong>in</strong> a market on usual trade terms; (ii) the person is unable to obta<strong>in</strong>adequate supplies of the product because of <strong>in</strong>sufficient competition among suppliers of the product <strong>in</strong> themarket; (iii) the customer is will<strong>in</strong>g and able to meet the usual trade terms of the suppliers of the product; (iv)the product is <strong>in</strong> ample supply; and (v) the refusal to deal is hav<strong>in</strong>g or is likely to have an adverse effect oncompetition <strong>in</strong> a market.In decid<strong>in</strong>g whether to exercise its discretion to make an order for supply once all of the elements describedabove have been established, the Tribunal has <strong>in</strong>dicated that it considers a number of factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g whetherthe respondent has legitimate reasons for discont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g supply (e.g., the atta<strong>in</strong>ment of distribution sav<strong>in</strong>gs), theduration of the supply relationship, and the manner <strong>in</strong> which any cut-off of the customer was implemented.PRICE MAINTENANCEThe Tribunal may make an order prohibit<strong>in</strong>g a person from engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> price ma<strong>in</strong>tenance or requir<strong>in</strong>g a personfound to be engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> price ma<strong>in</strong>tenance to accept another person as a customer on usual trade terms. Pricema<strong>in</strong>tenance occurs where: (a) a person either: (i) by agreement, threat, promise or any like means, has<strong>in</strong>fluenced upward, or discouraged the reduction of, the price at which its customer or another reseller of itsproduct sells or offers to sell the product; or (ii) has refused to supply a product to or has otherwisediscrim<strong>in</strong>ated aga<strong>in</strong>st, another person because of the low pric<strong>in</strong>g policy of that other person; and (b) suchconduct has had, is hav<strong>in</strong>g or is likely to have an adverse effect on competition.While the price ma<strong>in</strong>tenance provisions have most often been applied <strong>in</strong> the context of "vertical" resale pricema<strong>in</strong>tenance between a supplier and its retail distributors, the word<strong>in</strong>g is broad enough to also potentially applyto "horizontal" attempts to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> or raise prices of competitors. The Bureau has occasionally sought toenforce the price ma<strong>in</strong>tenance provisions <strong>in</strong> that context.AGREEMENTS THAT PREVENT OR LESSEN COMPETITION SUBSTANTIALLYThe Tribunal may, on application by the Commissioner, make an order prohibit<strong>in</strong>g any person from <strong>do<strong>in</strong>g</strong>anyth<strong>in</strong>g under an agreement or arrangement between competitors if the Tribunal f<strong>in</strong>ds that the agreement orarrangement (whether exist<strong>in</strong>g or proposed) has, or is likely to have, the effect of prevent<strong>in</strong>g or lessen<strong>in</strong>gcompetition substantially. It is expected that the Commissioner will use this civil provision to deal with36 Competition Law
anticompetitive agreements among competitors where the new per se crim<strong>in</strong>al offence (discussed above) doesnot apply.In many respects, agreements that fall with<strong>in</strong> the scope these provisions will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a mannerconsistent with the approach to mergers outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the Bureau's Merger Enforcement Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.OTHER NON-CRIMINAL REVIEWABLE MATTERSOther non-crim<strong>in</strong>al reviewable matters under the CA <strong>in</strong>clude exclusive deal<strong>in</strong>g, tied sell<strong>in</strong>g and marketrestriction. As noted above, mislead<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g can be dealt with under civil or crim<strong>in</strong>al provisions.PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTIONThe CA allows a private party to sue for and recover "an amount equal to the loss or damage proved to havebeen suffered by him" as a result of a defendant engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> conduct contrary to the crim<strong>in</strong>al provisions of theCA or fail<strong>in</strong>g to comply with an order made pursuant to the CA.In addition, the CA provides private parties with a limited right of access to the Tribunal under the refusal todeal, price ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, exclusive deal<strong>in</strong>g, tied sell<strong>in</strong>g and market restriction provisions. In order to lessen therisk of strategic litigation, the CA <strong>in</strong>cludes several safeguards, such as the requirement that an applicant obta<strong>in</strong>leave of the Tribunal prior to br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g an application under one or more of these provisions. Additionalsafeguards aga<strong>in</strong>st strategic litigation <strong>in</strong>clude the ability of the Tribunal to award costs aga<strong>in</strong>st any party <strong>in</strong>accordance with the Federal Court Rules and the <strong>in</strong>ability of the Tribunal to award damages to an aggrievedparty.ACQUIRING A BUSINESS IN CANADAThe CA also establishes a comprehensive framework for review<strong>in</strong>g and controll<strong>in</strong>g mergers and acquisitions <strong>in</strong>Canada. In addition, transactions that exceed certa<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial thresholds and, <strong>in</strong> the case of share acquisitions,that exceed an additional vot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest threshold may be subject to pre-merger notification requirements andcorrespond<strong>in</strong>g wait<strong>in</strong>g periods. The CA applies to all mergers <strong>in</strong> Canada, while the Investment Canada Act istargeted at the acquisition of exist<strong>in</strong>g and the establishment of new Canadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>es by non-Canadians.SUBSTANTIVE MERGER REVIEWAny merger (def<strong>in</strong>ed to mean the acquisition or establishment, direct or <strong>in</strong>direct, of control over or a significant<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> all or part of a <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> of a competitor, supplier, customer or other person) may be challenged underthe CA by the Commissioner before the Tribunal. The Commissioner may br<strong>in</strong>g an application before theTribunal <strong>in</strong> respect of a proposed transaction or <strong>in</strong> respect of a completed transaction provided the application ismade with<strong>in</strong> one year of clos<strong>in</strong>g. The Tribunal may issue an order with respect to all or any part of a proposedtransaction, and may dissolve a completed transaction or order divestiture of assets or shares. Under certa<strong>in</strong>circumstances, the Tribunal may also make any other order to which the Commissioner and the parties to thetransaction consent. The Tribunal also has the power to grant <strong>in</strong>junctive relief.Before mak<strong>in</strong>g any order, the Tribunal must determ<strong>in</strong>e that the transaction prevents or lessens, or is likely toprevent or lessen, competition substantially <strong>in</strong> the relevant market. In mak<strong>in</strong>g this determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the Tribunalgenerally applies economic and legal analyses similar to those employed by United States courts <strong>in</strong> antitrustmatters. Among the factors that the Tribunal may consider are the likelihood of foreign competition, whetherthe acquired <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> has failed or is likely to fail, the extent and availability of acceptable substitutes, barriersto entry, and <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> the market. The Tribunal may also consider whether the transaction results <strong>in</strong> theremoval of a vigorous competitor from the market and whether effective competition would rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> themarket follow<strong>in</strong>g the transaction.Competition Law 37
- Page 1 and 2: DOING BUSINESSIN CANADAYOUR COMPLET
- Page 3 and 4: ONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSINTRODUCTIO
- Page 5 and 6: IntroductionPOLITICAL AND CONSTITUT
- Page 7 and 8: 5RealEstateIndustrial and Intellect
- Page 9 and 10: accordance with directions from the
- Page 11 and 12: TITLE INSURANCE, TITLE OPINIONS AND
- Page 13 and 14: 11EnvironmentalLawIndustrial and In
- Page 15 and 16: commercial activities, or carrying
- Page 17 and 18: The federal government currently re
- Page 19 and 20: 17Types ofBusiness OrganizationIndu
- Page 21 and 22: provincial law cannot do so as of r
- Page 23 and 24: partnership, limited partners’ li
- Page 25 and 26: parties. In Québec, joint venturer
- Page 27 and 28: 25Financing aBusiness OperationIndu
- Page 29 and 30: The Civil Code of Québec provides
- Page 31 and 32: 29CorporateGovernanceIndustrial and
- Page 33 and 34: Instrument 58-101. The practices re
- Page 35 and 36: 33CompetitionLawIndustrial and Inte
- Page 37: BID-RIGGINGBid rigging is any agree
- Page 41 and 42: 39ForeignInvestmentIndustrial and I
- Page 43 and 44: apply for Canadian citizenship. (Pe
- Page 45 and 46: (D)GENERAL REVIEW THRESHOLDSThe fol
- Page 47 and 48: there be an "acquisition of control
- Page 49 and 50: Industrial and Intellectual Propert
- Page 51 and 52: to perform or cause them to be perf
- Page 53 and 54: Registration grants an exclusive ri
- Page 55 and 56: PIPEDA applies in all provinces of
- Page 57 and 58: Employment LawCanadian employment l
- Page 59 and 60: displacement, laying-off, suspensio
- Page 61 and 62: easonable cause to believe that the
- Page 63 and 64: 63Retirement Plans, EmployeeBenefit
- Page 65 and 66: • funding;• eligibility;• pen
- Page 67 and 68: 67Temporary Entry andPermanent Resi
- Page 69 and 70: INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTSIn recent y
- Page 71 and 72: immigrant in another class, he or s
- Page 73 and 74: 73Bankruptcy andInsolvency Proceedi
- Page 75 and 76: BANKRUPTCYBankruptcy results in the
- Page 77 and 78: INTERNATIONAL BANKRUPTCYASSETS LOCA
- Page 79 and 80: Tax ConsiderationsThis chapter prov
- Page 81 and 82: TAX REPORTINGAnnual Tax ReturnsCana
- Page 83 and 84: Québec has legislation that limits
- Page 85 and 86: Amendments, SIFTs and their unithol
- Page 87 and 88: Conversely, where a Canadian reside
- Page 89 and 90:
A person, whether resident in Canad
- Page 91 and 92:
APPENDIX I: CANADA’S IN FORCE TAX
- Page 93:
TORONTODAVIES WARD PHILLIPS & VINEB