appo<strong>in</strong>t a receiver on a national basis. There are no statutory criteria establish<strong>in</strong>g which entities may be subjectto receivership proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. As a result, it is largely a function of the court's discretion.CCAA PROCEEDINGSLarge <strong>in</strong>solvent entities generally attempt to restructure under the CCAA. A significant number of Canadian<strong>in</strong>solvency restructur<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong>itiated under the CCAA because of its flexibility, which allows the <strong>in</strong>solventcorporation to design its restructur<strong>in</strong>g plan to fit its particular circumstances. The CCAA permits debtors tomake compromises or arrangements with their creditors, both secured and unsecured.The CCAA is available to any company <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> Canada or with assets or <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> activities <strong>in</strong> Canadathat is <strong>in</strong>solvent or has committed an act of bankruptcy and whose total creditor claims exceed $5 million (aloneor as part of a corporate group), with the exception of banks, <strong>in</strong>surance companies, loan companies, trustcompanies and authorized foreign banks.The purpose of the CCAA is to facilitate the mak<strong>in</strong>g of a compromise or arrangement between an <strong>in</strong>solventdebtor company and its creditors <strong>in</strong> order that the company can cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>. Recently, the CCAA hasalso been used, <strong>in</strong> limited circumstances, for complex liquidations. When a company has availed itself of theCCAA, the court is called upon to play a supervisory role to preserve the status quo and to move the processalong to the po<strong>in</strong>t where a compromise or arrangement is either approved, or it is evident that the attempt isdoomed to failure.A proposed restructur<strong>in</strong>g under the CCAA is commenced by an application to a court for an order stay<strong>in</strong>gproceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st the debtor company and grant<strong>in</strong>g such relief as is with<strong>in</strong> the discretion of the court. Thecourt is required by the CCAA to appo<strong>in</strong>t a monitor to monitor the <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> and f<strong>in</strong>ancial affairs of the companywhile the stay order rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> effect. Because of the broad discretion given to the court supervis<strong>in</strong>g a CCAArestructur<strong>in</strong>g, there is no fixed form of stay order prescribed by the CCAA, although <strong>in</strong> some prov<strong>in</strong>ces templateorders have been endorsed by the court. The CCAA conta<strong>in</strong>s provisions outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the process which must befollowed <strong>in</strong> connection with such th<strong>in</strong>gs as the right of a debtor to disclaim or resiliate contracts, the availabilityand terms of any super-priority debtor-<strong>in</strong>-possession f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g, and the circumstances <strong>in</strong> which all or part of thedebtor company's assets may be sold before the presentation of a plan.Among other th<strong>in</strong>gs, the court's <strong>in</strong>itial order will <strong>in</strong>clude the right and obligation of the debtor company to file aplan of arrangement with<strong>in</strong> a given time. The plan of compromise must be submitted for creditors' approval at ameet<strong>in</strong>g of each class of creditors. The creditors' approval required is the same as for a proposal under the BIA:a majority of the number of creditors' vot<strong>in</strong>g and two-thirds of the value of the claims of the creditors vot<strong>in</strong>g.Once the creditors have voted <strong>in</strong> favour of the plan, an order of the court must be granted to sanction<strong>in</strong>g theplan if it is proven to be fair and reasonable under the circumstances. However, if the creditors or the courtrefuse to approve the plan, there is no automatic bankruptcy.WURA PROCEEDINGSAlthough it is also possible for most <strong>in</strong>solvent corporations to be liquidated under the WURA (but notcorporations <strong>in</strong>corporated under the Canada Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Corporations Act), <strong>in</strong> practice this statute is used almostexclusively for the w<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g-up of <strong>in</strong>solvent regulated f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions under the supervision of theirregulators, <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act (the "CDIC Act") and the Bank Act.Under the CDIC Act, an order can be made vest<strong>in</strong>g all the shares and subord<strong>in</strong>ated debt issued by a bank <strong>in</strong> theCanada Deposit Insurance Corporation or appo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g the latter as a receiver. The Bank Act <strong>in</strong>cludes provisionsallow<strong>in</strong>g the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of F<strong>in</strong>ancial Institutions to take control of the assets of a bank and manage thew<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g-up process. In practice, these steps are comb<strong>in</strong>ed with WURA proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, as it provides the statutoryframework for deal<strong>in</strong>g with creditors' claims.76 Bankruptcy and Insolvency Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs
INTERNATIONAL BANKRUPTCYASSETS LOCATED IN FOREIGN JURISDICTIONOrders of Canadian courts are usually effective only <strong>in</strong> Canada. Therefore, <strong>in</strong> order for the assets of a Canadian<strong>in</strong>solvent debtor located <strong>in</strong> a foreign jurisdiction to be subject to the stay of proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> a Canadian<strong>in</strong>solvency, it would be necessary for the Canadian court to request a court <strong>in</strong> the jurisdiction of the assets toissue a parallel stay order or a parallel <strong>in</strong>solvency proceed<strong>in</strong>g to facilitate the Canadian proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. While it isfairly common for such parallel proceed<strong>in</strong>gs to be <strong>in</strong>itiated, where Canadian <strong>in</strong>solvent debtors have significantassets <strong>in</strong> other jurisdictions, the great majority of such parallel proceed<strong>in</strong>gs have <strong>in</strong>volved only Canada and theUnited States.CANADIAN COURT RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN PROCEEDINGSCanadian <strong>in</strong>solvency legislation provides for the jurisdiction of Canadian courts to recognize foreign <strong>in</strong>solvencyproceed<strong>in</strong>gs. Canada has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency <strong>in</strong> this regard.However, the approach differs from that of other countries and there are some important differences that areunique to Canada.The recognition of foreign proceed<strong>in</strong>gs does not deprive the Canadian court of jurisdiction <strong>in</strong> the event thatthere is a fairness or equity issue. As a result, even to the extent that a Canadian court recognizes a foreignproceed<strong>in</strong>g, that foreign proceed<strong>in</strong>g must treat Canadian creditors and assets <strong>in</strong> a manner consistent withCanadian legal standards.Bankruptcy and Insolvency Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 77
- Page 1 and 2:
DOING BUSINESSIN CANADAYOUR COMPLET
- Page 3 and 4:
ONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSINTRODUCTIO
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionPOLITICAL AND CONSTITUT
- Page 7 and 8:
5RealEstateIndustrial and Intellect
- Page 9 and 10:
accordance with directions from the
- Page 11 and 12:
TITLE INSURANCE, TITLE OPINIONS AND
- Page 13 and 14:
11EnvironmentalLawIndustrial and In
- Page 15 and 16:
commercial activities, or carrying
- Page 17 and 18:
The federal government currently re
- Page 19 and 20:
17Types ofBusiness OrganizationIndu
- Page 21 and 22:
provincial law cannot do so as of r
- Page 23 and 24:
partnership, limited partners’ li
- Page 25 and 26: parties. In Québec, joint venturer
- Page 27 and 28: 25Financing aBusiness OperationIndu
- Page 29 and 30: The Civil Code of Québec provides
- Page 31 and 32: 29CorporateGovernanceIndustrial and
- Page 33 and 34: Instrument 58-101. The practices re
- Page 35 and 36: 33CompetitionLawIndustrial and Inte
- Page 37 and 38: BID-RIGGINGBid rigging is any agree
- Page 39 and 40: anticompetitive agreements among co
- Page 41 and 42: 39ForeignInvestmentIndustrial and I
- Page 43 and 44: apply for Canadian citizenship. (Pe
- Page 45 and 46: (D)GENERAL REVIEW THRESHOLDSThe fol
- Page 47 and 48: there be an "acquisition of control
- Page 49 and 50: Industrial and Intellectual Propert
- Page 51 and 52: to perform or cause them to be perf
- Page 53 and 54: Registration grants an exclusive ri
- Page 55 and 56: PIPEDA applies in all provinces of
- Page 57 and 58: Employment LawCanadian employment l
- Page 59 and 60: displacement, laying-off, suspensio
- Page 61 and 62: easonable cause to believe that the
- Page 63 and 64: 63Retirement Plans, EmployeeBenefit
- Page 65 and 66: • funding;• eligibility;• pen
- Page 67 and 68: 67Temporary Entry andPermanent Resi
- Page 69 and 70: INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTSIn recent y
- Page 71 and 72: immigrant in another class, he or s
- Page 73 and 74: 73Bankruptcy andInsolvency Proceedi
- Page 75: BANKRUPTCYBankruptcy results in the
- Page 79 and 80: Tax ConsiderationsThis chapter prov
- Page 81 and 82: TAX REPORTINGAnnual Tax ReturnsCana
- Page 83 and 84: Québec has legislation that limits
- Page 85 and 86: Amendments, SIFTs and their unithol
- Page 87 and 88: Conversely, where a Canadian reside
- Page 89 and 90: A person, whether resident in Canad
- Page 91 and 92: APPENDIX I: CANADA’S IN FORCE TAX
- Page 93: TORONTODAVIES WARD PHILLIPS & VINEB