12.07.2015 Views

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Canadian Branch vs. Canadian SubsidiaryIn general, from a Canadian <strong>in</strong>come tax perspective, there is little difference between carry<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>through a Canadian branch of a non-resident entity and carry<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> through a wholly-owned Canadiansubsidiary.A Canadian <strong>in</strong>corporated subsidiary of a non-resident corporation is a Canadian resident for Canadian <strong>in</strong>cometax purposes and is therefore subject to tax <strong>in</strong> Canada on its worldwide <strong>in</strong>come. Certa<strong>in</strong> types of payments(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dividends, rent and royalties) made by a subsidiary to its non-resident parent are subject towithhold<strong>in</strong>g tax as discussed above.Similarly, Canadian tax will apply to the profits attributable to an un<strong>in</strong>corporated branch of a non-residentcarry<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> Canada. The allocation of items of <strong>in</strong>come and expense between head office and theCanadian branch may be unclear and can result <strong>in</strong> ambiguity <strong>in</strong> the computation of branch <strong>in</strong>come for purposesof the Tax Act. In addition, the Tax Act imposes a branch profits tax on the profits of the Canadian branch notre<strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> Canada. The branch profits tax is <strong>in</strong>tended to parallel the dividend withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax.Hybrid EntitiesNova Scotia, Alberta and British Columbia corporate law permits the establishment of unlimited liabilitycompanies or "ULCs". These entities are treated like regular Canadian resident corporations for Canadian taxpurposes; however, <strong>in</strong> the U.S., they are eligible to be treated as flow-through entities for U.S. tax purposes. Thisdual or "hybrid" tax characterization can be a useful plann<strong>in</strong>g feature. However, as a result of the amendedCanada-U.S. tax treaty, the use of a ULC after 2010 by U.S. residents should be carefully considered and mayrequire additional steps or <strong>in</strong>termediate entities <strong>in</strong> order to be beneficial.The amended Canada-U.S. tax treaty treats U.S. limited liability companies as a look-through for the purposes ofapply<strong>in</strong>g the provisions of such treaty.Capitalization of a Canadian CorporationA Canadian corporation may be capitalized with equity or with a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of debt and equity.As noted above, share capital of a Canadian private corporation can generally be returned to shareholders freefrom Canadian tax, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Canadian withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax applicable to non-resident shareholders.A distribution to a shareholder <strong>in</strong> excess of such share capital will be deemed to be a dividend for purposes ofthe Tax Act. Deemed dividends to non-resident shareholders are subject to withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax <strong>in</strong> the same mannerand at the same rate (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g any reduced treaty rate) as regular dividends.Repayment of pr<strong>in</strong>cipal loaned to a Canadian corporation by a non-resident shareholder is not subject towithhold<strong>in</strong>g tax, but, where applicable, tax must be withheld <strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>in</strong>terest paid or credited on the loan.Subject to the th<strong>in</strong> capitalization rule discussed below and the general limitations on <strong>in</strong>terest expense and lossesdescribed above, a Canadian subsidiary may deduct <strong>in</strong>terest paid or credited by it to a non-resident <strong>in</strong> comput<strong>in</strong>gits <strong>in</strong>come.Th<strong>in</strong> Capitalization and Interest ImputationThe "th<strong>in</strong> capitalization rule" is <strong>in</strong>tended to prevent a Canadian-<strong>in</strong>corporated subsidiary from excessivelyreduc<strong>in</strong>g its taxable Canadian profits, and hence its liability for Canadian tax, by maximiz<strong>in</strong>g its <strong>in</strong>terest expenseto related non-resident creditors. In very general terms, the subsidiary is denied an <strong>in</strong>terest deduction to theextent that its "relevant debt" exceeds two times its "relevant equity". Under current rules, the th<strong>in</strong>capitalization restrictions apply only to corporate borrowers.Tax Considerations 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!