12.07.2015 Views

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Amendments, SIFTs and their unitholders are taxed <strong>in</strong> a manner similar to corporations and their shareholders.Certa<strong>in</strong> real estate <strong>in</strong>vestment trusts (REITs) are exempt from SIFT taxation.The application of the SIFT Amendments to SIFTs exist<strong>in</strong>g on October 31, 2006 is deferred until 2011 providedthere is no "undue expansion" of the SIFT before that time as determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> accordance with guidel<strong>in</strong>esreleased by the Department of F<strong>in</strong>ance (the "Guidel<strong>in</strong>es").Specific rules were enacted to facilitate the conversion of SIFTs <strong>in</strong>to corporations. Such rules providemechanisms for a unitholder to be able to dispose of SIFT units on a rollover basis on a corporate conversionreorganization. These rules also facilitate corporate conversions of SIFTs by address<strong>in</strong>g issues such as employeeoptions, debt settlement, and third-party creditors.General Anti-Avoidance RuleThe Tax Act <strong>in</strong>cludes a broadly-worded anti-avoidance rule ("GAAR") to prevent "abusive avoidancetransactions". The rule supplements specific anti-avoidance rules <strong>in</strong> the Tax Act. GAAR is not <strong>in</strong>tended to applyto a transaction that is undertaken primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obta<strong>in</strong> a tax benefit, or thatdoes not result <strong>in</strong> an abusive tax avoidance. If GAAR applies, CRA may re-determ<strong>in</strong>e the tax consequences of atransaction or series of transactions result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> tax liability for one or more participants <strong>in</strong> the transaction(s).SPECIAL RULES FOR NON-RESIDENTSWithhold<strong>in</strong>g TaxA person resident (or deemed resident) of Canada who makes a payment to a non-resident <strong>in</strong> respect of mosttypes of passive <strong>in</strong>come (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dividends, rent, and royalties) is generally required to withhold tax equal to25% of the gross amount of the payment. Interest that is “participat<strong>in</strong>g debt <strong>in</strong>terest” and <strong>in</strong>terest paid orcredited by a Canadian resident to a non-arm’s length non-resident person is also subject to withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax.Conversely, <strong>in</strong>terest other than "participat<strong>in</strong>g debt <strong>in</strong>terest" paid by a Canadian resident to an arm's length nonresidentperson is exempt from withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax.The fifth protocol to the Canada-U.S. tax treaty has elim<strong>in</strong>ated withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax for payments of <strong>in</strong>terest to nonarm'slength U.S. persons that are entitled to the benefits of such treaty for 2010 and subsequent years.The 25% withhold<strong>in</strong>g rate may be reduced under an applicable tax treaty. For dividends, the typical treaty rateis 15%, except where the shareholder is a corporation that beneficially owns 10% or more of the vot<strong>in</strong>g shares ofthe dividend payer, <strong>in</strong> which case the rate is generally reduced to 5%. The typical treaty rate on royalties is 10%and may be reduced to 0% on certa<strong>in</strong> royalties.A partnership, any member of which is a non-resident, is itself deemed to be a non-resident under the Tax Act.Consequently, a payment by a Canadian resident to a partnership with any non-resident members is subject tofull withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax; however, adm<strong>in</strong>istratively, CRA may permit the payer to look through the partnership andwithhold based on the residence and treaty status of the members of the partnership.Although withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax is imposed on the non-resident recipient, the resident payer is required to deduct thetax and remit it to CRA on behalf of the non-resident, fail<strong>in</strong>g which the resident payer becomes liable for the tax.A non-resident carry<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> through a Canadian branch may be deemed to be a resident of Canada forpurposes of the withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax rules. The effect of these rules is to make certa<strong>in</strong> payments made by the nonresidentto another non-resident subject to Canadian withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax.86 Tax Considerations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!