12.07.2015 Views

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• real property situated <strong>in</strong> Canada;• assets used <strong>in</strong> a <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> carried on <strong>in</strong> Canada;• a share of a private corporation, an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> a trust or an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> a partnership more than 50% ofthe value of which was derived from real or immovable property situated <strong>in</strong> Canada, Canadian resourceproperty, or timber resource property at any time <strong>in</strong> the 60 month period prior to the disposition ofsuch shares or other <strong>in</strong>terests; and• units of a mutual fund trust and listed shares of a corporation, where at any time dur<strong>in</strong>g the 60-monthperiod preced<strong>in</strong>g the disposition, a 25% ownership threshold is exceeded and more than 50% of thevalue of the units or shares was derived from real or immovable property situated <strong>in</strong> Canada, Canadianresource property, or timber resource property.Prior to March 4, 2010, the def<strong>in</strong>ition of taxable Canadian property <strong>in</strong>cluded all shares of a private Canadiancorporation, regardless of the nature of the corporation's assets. The Government of Québec, which is the onlyCanadian prov<strong>in</strong>ce with similar rules, announced its <strong>in</strong>tention to harmonize the def<strong>in</strong>ition of taxable Québecproperty accord<strong>in</strong>gly.DETERMINATION OF CANADIAN RESIDENCEThe term "resident <strong>in</strong> Canada" is not def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the Tax Act but <strong>in</strong>stead a person's residence is determ<strong>in</strong>ed bycommon law criteria. However, there are some specific deem<strong>in</strong>g rules <strong>in</strong> the Tax Act that deem certa<strong>in</strong> personsto be either resident or not resident <strong>in</strong> Canada for purposes of the Tax Act.A corporation <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> Canada after April 26, 1965 (or, <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> limited situations, before this date) isdeemed to be resident <strong>in</strong> Canada.There is no statutory rule that deems a corporation <strong>in</strong>corporated outside Canada to be resident <strong>in</strong> Canada.Under the common law test of residence, a corporation will be considered to be resident <strong>in</strong> Canada if its centralmanagement and control is located <strong>in</strong> Canada. Central management and control is generally considered to referto the superior or direct<strong>in</strong>g decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> respect of a corporation that is normally exercised by its board ofdirectors. As a result, the place where the board of directors exercises its decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g powers will generallybe the place <strong>in</strong> which the central management and control of the corporation is located.In the case of an <strong>in</strong>dividual, the courts have generally held that residence is determ<strong>in</strong>ed on the basis of thedegree to which an <strong>in</strong>dividual "settles <strong>in</strong>to or ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s" his or her ord<strong>in</strong>ary mode of liv<strong>in</strong>g at the place <strong>in</strong>question. In addition, an <strong>in</strong>dividual will be regarded as establish<strong>in</strong>g Canadian residency if he or she is ord<strong>in</strong>arilyresident <strong>in</strong> Canada. The determ<strong>in</strong>ation of whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is ord<strong>in</strong>arily resident <strong>in</strong> Canada depends onwhether Canada is the place where the <strong>in</strong>dividual, <strong>in</strong> the settled rout<strong>in</strong>e of his or her life, regularly, normally orcustomarily lives. In addition, the Tax Act deems an <strong>in</strong>dividual who "sojourns" <strong>in</strong> Canada for 183 or more daysdur<strong>in</strong>g a year to be resident <strong>in</strong> Canada throughout that year.In general, a trust will be resident <strong>in</strong> Canada for <strong>in</strong>come tax purposes where a majority of its trustees areresident <strong>in</strong> Canada. However, a careful exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the facts of each situation, as well as a review of recentjurisprudence, is necessary to help determ<strong>in</strong>e the residency of a trust. In addition, certa<strong>in</strong> non-resident trustswill be deemed to be resident <strong>in</strong> Canada <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances.A taxpayer who is considered under Canadian domestic law to be resident <strong>in</strong> Canada and at the same timeresident <strong>in</strong> another country may be deemed by an applicable tax treaty to be resident <strong>in</strong> only one country for taxpurposes.Tax Considerations 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!