12.07.2015 Views

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

doing business in canada - Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(D)GENERAL REVIEW THRESHOLDSThe follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> Canadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>es, other than those which qualify for the WTO review thresholdsdescribed above, are subject to review by the M<strong>in</strong>ister:• a direct acquisition of a Canadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> with assets of $5 million or more;• an <strong>in</strong>direct acquisition of a Canadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> with assets of $50 million or more; and• an <strong>in</strong>direct acquisition of a Canadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> with assets of $5 million or more, if the assets of theCanadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> represent more than 50% of all the assets acquired <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational transaction.In certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances, acquisitions may be subject to review under the ICA regardless of the value of theassets <strong>in</strong>volved where the <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> activity <strong>in</strong> question is "related to Canada's cultural heritage or nationalidentity". Such <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> activities <strong>in</strong>clude a <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> that carries on any of the cultural activities describedabove, other than the radio, television or other broadcast<strong>in</strong>g activities there<strong>in</strong> described.Aga<strong>in</strong>, there is no de m<strong>in</strong>imis exception to the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of whether a <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> carries on any such culturalactivities. A corporation primarily engaged <strong>in</strong> some other type of <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> which also, for example, distributessome books or magaz<strong>in</strong>es for sale may be considered to be a <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> related to Canada's cultural heritage,even if such distribution and sales represent only a small part of that corporation's activities.In addition, "anti-avoidance" provisions <strong>in</strong> the ICA permit the M<strong>in</strong>ister to deem an entity which carries on orproposes to carry on any of the above-noted cultural activities to be a "non-Canadian" on the basis that theentity is controlled <strong>in</strong> fact (possibly through means other than the ownership of vot<strong>in</strong>g shares) by one or morenon-Canadians. The M<strong>in</strong>ister may also deem a transaction to be an acquisition of control where one of theentities <strong>in</strong>volved carries on or proposes to carry on any cultural <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>. The M<strong>in</strong>ister has the discretion tomake such a determ<strong>in</strong>ation retroactive.THE REVIEW CRITERION - "NET BENEFIT TO CANADA"If an acquisition is subject to review, the M<strong>in</strong>ister must be satisfied that the proposed acquisition is likely to be of"net benefit to Canada". The ICA requires the M<strong>in</strong>ister to take <strong>in</strong>to account certa<strong>in</strong> factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g (i) theeffect of the acquisition on the level and nature of economic activity <strong>in</strong> Canada (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g employment <strong>in</strong>Canada); (ii) the degree and significance of participation by Canadians <strong>in</strong> the Canadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular and<strong>in</strong> the relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> general; (iii) the effect of the <strong>in</strong>vestment on productivity, <strong>in</strong>dustrial efficiency,technological development, product <strong>in</strong>novation and product variety <strong>in</strong> Canada; (iv) the effect of the <strong>in</strong>vestmenton competition <strong>in</strong> the relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry or <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> Canada; (v) the compatibility of the <strong>in</strong>vestment withCanadian <strong>in</strong>dustrial, economic and cultural policies, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the policy objectives of affectedprov<strong>in</strong>ces; and (vi) the effect of the <strong>in</strong>vestment on Canada's ability to compete <strong>in</strong> world markets. The IRD andCanadian Heritage have released specific policies with respect to the application of these criteria to varioussectors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the book publish<strong>in</strong>g, film and uranium <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> Canada.ICA guidel<strong>in</strong>es issued <strong>in</strong> December 2007 state that where the acquiror is a foreign "state-owned enterprise", the"net benefit to Canada" review will focus particularly on whether the acquiror adheres to Canadian standards ofcorporate governance and whether the Canadian <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to operate on a commercial basis.In order to establish "net benefit" under these criteria, the M<strong>in</strong>ister may require undertak<strong>in</strong>gs from the acquiror.Typical undertak<strong>in</strong>gs relate to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> employment levels <strong>in</strong> Canada, guarantee<strong>in</strong>g participation ofCanadians as directors and <strong>in</strong> management, process<strong>in</strong>g resource products <strong>in</strong> Canada, mak<strong>in</strong>g capitalexpenditures or <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> research and development <strong>in</strong> Canada, and transferr<strong>in</strong>g technology to Canada.However, NAFTA imposes certa<strong>in</strong> restrictions on the types of undertak<strong>in</strong>gs that the M<strong>in</strong>ister may require fromForeign Investment 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!