events. The analysis undertaken <strong>in</strong> this report usesseveral methodologies that have long been used<strong>in</strong> the context of disaster risk management—suchas damage cost assessment <strong>and</strong> probabilistic riskanalysis—illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the opportunities for crossfertilization<strong>in</strong> both areas.Structure of the ReportChapter 2 presents methodologies used to determ<strong>in</strong>eclimate change <strong>risks</strong> at the city/river-bas<strong>in</strong>level through downscal<strong>in</strong>g techniques, flood riskassessment through hydrometeorological models,<strong>and</strong> damage cost analysis. Chapter 3 presentsthe ma<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from climate downscal<strong>in</strong>g,hydrological model<strong>in</strong>g analyses, <strong>and</strong> use of GISmapp<strong>in</strong>g. 10 Chapter 4 presents the analysis <strong>and</strong>f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs relat<strong>in</strong>g to damage cost assessment, aswell as an analysis of <strong>adaptation</strong> options. F<strong>in</strong>ally,Chapter 5 draws broad policy lessons <strong>and</strong> presentsconclusions.10For a broader set of GIS maps, please refer to city-specificreports.4 | <strong>Climate</strong> Risks <strong>and</strong> Adaptation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> Coastal Megacities: A Synthesis Report
2Methodologies forDownscal<strong>in</strong>g, HydrologicalMapp<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> Assess<strong>in</strong>gDamage CostsIn order to assess the impact of climate change<strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>creased flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2050 <strong>in</strong> eachof the <strong>coastal</strong> cities, three ma<strong>in</strong> methodologicalsteps were taken. These <strong>in</strong>clude (1) determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gclimate-related impacts at the city/river-bas<strong>in</strong> levelthrough downscal<strong>in</strong>g; (2) develop<strong>in</strong>g flood riskassessment hydrometeorological models for eachcity to estimate flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2050 under different scenarios;<strong>and</strong> (3) assess<strong>in</strong>g damage costs. This chapterprovides a summary of these methodologies. Ithighlights the climate change scenarios selected, approachesto downscal<strong>in</strong>g, assumptions underly<strong>in</strong>ghydrological analysis, <strong>and</strong> the approach to damagecost assessment. Some of the methodologies usedhere—such as damage cost analysis <strong>and</strong> probabilisticrisk assessment—are also used <strong>in</strong> disaster riskmanagement. 11 Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>and</strong> errors <strong>in</strong>volved<strong>in</strong> different steps of the analysis are also discussed.Selection of EmissionsScenarios, Downscal<strong>in</strong>g,<strong>and</strong> Uncerta<strong>in</strong>tiesTo measure the impact of climate change on thecities <strong>in</strong> 2050, it was necessary to assume emissionsscenarios <strong>and</strong> as a first step, “downscale” climatechange forecasts to local levels so that the meteorologicalparameters—such as changes <strong>in</strong> temperature<strong>and</strong> precipitation—could be applied as <strong>in</strong>puts to thehydrometeorological models.Range of emissions scenarios consideredThe potential impact of climate change can varygreatly depend<strong>in</strong>g on the development pathwaythat is assumed. Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1992, the IPCC hasprovided various scenarios for the emissions ofgreenhouse gases based on assumptions of differentdevelopment pathways—namely, complex <strong>and</strong>dynamic <strong>in</strong>teractions among future demographicchanges, economic growth, <strong>and</strong> technological <strong>and</strong> environmentalchanges. These emissions scenarios areprojections of what the future may look like <strong>and</strong> area tool to model climate change impacts <strong>and</strong> relateduncerta<strong>in</strong>ties. As described <strong>in</strong> the IPCC Special Report11A probabilistic risk assessment provides an estimateof the probability of loss due to hazards. It is commonlyused <strong>in</strong> disaster risk management plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> provides aquantitative basel<strong>in</strong>e for measur<strong>in</strong>g the benefits (or lossesavoided) of disaster management alternatives. In climatechange impact <strong>and</strong> <strong>adaptation</strong> studies, it also provides abasel<strong>in</strong>e for assess<strong>in</strong>g the change <strong>in</strong> <strong>risks</strong> due to the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>ghydrometeorological hazards associated withclimate change. See, for <strong>in</strong>stance, Earthquake VulnerabilityReduction Program <strong>in</strong> Colombia, A Probabilistic Cost-benefitAnalysis (World Bank Policy Research Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper3939, June 2006) for an example of a probabilistic risk assessmentused <strong>in</strong> disaster risk management plann<strong>in</strong>g. Theprocess <strong>in</strong>volves the development of several <strong>in</strong>terconnectedmodules, which calculate <strong>in</strong> turn the hazard probability,exposure, vulnerability (or sensitivity to damage),damages, <strong>and</strong> losses. While the approaches used <strong>in</strong> the developmentof the modules <strong>and</strong> the calculation of the lossesvaried, each city case study did, however, follow a similaranalytical process.5