12.07.2015 Views

Regulatory and policy options to encourage development of ...

Regulatory and policy options to encourage development of ...

Regulatory and policy options to encourage development of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICYMAKING TRAINING MANUALpage 9.14The level <strong>of</strong> deployment <strong>of</strong> technologies is not set in advance, but instead isdriven by the level <strong>of</strong> the premium in the tariff price. In other words, the governmentsets the price for the output from renewable energy genera<strong>to</strong>rs, but lets themarket determine the level <strong>of</strong> output. This in turn means that the <strong>to</strong>tal costs <strong>of</strong>the scheme are not known in advance because the costs will depend on the success<strong>of</strong> the mechanism in driving new capacity. Having said that, it would be possible<strong>to</strong> make sensible predictions about the amount <strong>of</strong> new capacity likely <strong>to</strong> bestimulated <strong>and</strong> hence the costs, based on the prices set in the tariffs.Similarly, the length <strong>of</strong> a scheme can mean that technological <strong>development</strong>s overthe course <strong>of</strong> a few years allow participants <strong>to</strong> make windfall pr<strong>of</strong>its in the lastfew years. A degree <strong>of</strong> flexibility should therefore be designed in <strong>to</strong> any scheme<strong>to</strong> ensure that the tariffs are not set unreasonably high, especially in the lateryears <strong>of</strong> a scheme.The design <strong>of</strong> a tariff scheme may have <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account the availability <strong>of</strong>renewable resources. For example, areas <strong>of</strong> high wind will obviously prove moreattractive <strong>to</strong> developers seeking <strong>to</strong> maximize their returns. This can mean thatnetworks in areas with high wind resources are targeted by developers, whichin turn means that the cus<strong>to</strong>mers <strong>of</strong> the network in that area are potentiallysubject <strong>to</strong> higher prices than network cus<strong>to</strong>mers in areas with less wind. Thetariff scheme can be designed <strong>to</strong> minimize this by <strong>of</strong>fering higher prices forwind output in areas with less wind resources, so encouraging developers <strong>to</strong>site projects there. Alternatively, in order <strong>to</strong> distribute the financial impactequally over consumers <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> avoid significant differences in price, the levy<strong>to</strong> finance the feed-in scheme can be equally covered by all the existing networks(cf. Germany).As well as the level <strong>to</strong> which the tariff is set, the success <strong>of</strong> such schemes c<strong>and</strong>epend on: Access charges <strong>to</strong> the grid—transmission or distribution. Any limits set on capacity. The ease <strong>of</strong> siting projects—i.e. getting approvals through planning systems.Quota mechanismsQuota mechanisms, also known as renewable portfolio st<strong>and</strong>ards (RPS), are anobligation for electricity suppliers <strong>to</strong> take a certain amount <strong>of</strong> sustainable power,or for cus<strong>to</strong>mers <strong>to</strong> source a proportion <strong>of</strong> their power from renewable energysources.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!