Adaptability of cashpoints for the disabled

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The first thing to consider are the anthropometric parameters that will beused when recommending the measurements of automatic cashpointmachine with different options for inclination of the panel in accordancewith the requirements for the viewing angles (Figure 4.8).InterfaceInterfaceFigure 4.8: Anthropometric parameters. (Source: SIRIUS)ADAPTABILITY OF CASHPOINTS FOR THE DISABLED29
There are four options proposed that enable frontal approach by people inwheelchairs according to the form of the cashpoint machine. (Figure 4.9)Depth of reachOption 1 Option 2Maximum heightof reachDepth of reachMaximum heightof reachInterfaceMinimum heightof reachInterfaceMinimum heightof reachContour limitOption 3Depth of reachMaximum heightof reachOption 4Depth of reachContourlimitContour limitMaximum heightof reachMinimum heightof reachMinimum heightof reachFigure 4.9: Design parameters for access to the interactive elements of automatic cashpointmachines. (Source: SIRIUS)The cases specified are determined by whether it is possible to place the kneesor part of the legs below the work surface (corresponding to the upperfigures), if they enable feet to be placed there (maximum 10 cm) or not ifthere is space (lower figures):• Option 1: Enables perfect front approach to the automatic cashpointmachines, which have a scope of 0.7 m height and 0.35 m depth.• Option 2: The scope is of 0.7 m height and 0.25 m depth.• Option 3: The most restrictive in terms of the depth of the margin, sincethere is no possibility of placing the legs. In this option, which enables thefeet to be accommodated, the scope is 1 m height and 0.1 m depth.• Option 4: The elements of the automatic cashpoint machine must be placedat the front in a margin of 1 m height. It is the most restrictive case of all.30 ADAPTABILITY OF CASHPOINTS FOR THE DISABLED
Page 1 and 2: Adaptability of cashpointsfor the d
Page 3 and 4: FUNDACIÓ BARCELONA DIGITALResearch
Page 5 and 6: 4.4 Interface accessibility . . . .
Page 7 and 8: 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDYThe objec
Page 9 and 10: 4. STUDY4.1 Analysis of the disable
Page 11 and 12: 1. The first group corresponds to a
Page 13 and 14: These are perceived by the angle be
Page 15 and 16: 4.2 International benchmarkingThis
Page 17 and 18: 4.2.3 The United KingdomIn 1995 the
Page 19 and 20: 4.2.5 Comparative of international
Page 21 and 22: NTERFACE ACCESSIBILITYEntrancedevic
Page 23 and 24: Currentinternationalstandards aresi
Page 25 and 26: Combinations recommended regarding
Page 27 and 28: In some cases queuing up to use the
Page 29: 4.4 Interface accessibilityThis sec
Page 33 and 34: Bank bookIt is important to insert
Page 35 and 36: As well as being standardised, it i
Page 37 and 38: It has already been mentioned that
Page 39 and 40: 4.5 Analysis of the disabilities fe
Page 41 and 42: Below we show if these problems dis
Page 43 and 44: 42 ADAPTABILITY OF CASHPOINTS FOR T
Page 45 and 46: 4.7 Regulatory proposal4.7.1 NormsT
Page 47 and 48: involve physical changes in the cas
Page 49 and 50: H. SILVER, Janet; GILL. John. Text
Page 51 and 52: 6.2 Legal database relating to the
Page 53 and 54: • Real Decreto 556/1989, de 19 de
Page 55 and 56: One. The Public Administrations wil
Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 7: COMMUNICATION ELEMENTS A
Page 59 and 60: Advisory 707.6.2 Numeric Keys. Tele
Page 61 and 62: 6.3.2 Contents of the standard adop
Page 63 and 64: 11.2.5.4 Audio Operation ..........
Page 65 and 66: 6.3.4 Contents of the study mention
Page 67 and 68: 6.4 Scope of the interactive elemen
Page 69 and 70: 6.4.2 Scope of the interactive elem
Page 71 and 72: PriorityAmbit Proposal Positioning/
Page 73 and 74: 6.6 Glossary of sensory disability
Page 75: 6.7 Statistical data of ONCE6.7.1 M
Page 78 and 79: Design, layout and printingwww.cege

Adaptability of cashpoints for the disabled

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?