Analysis of 2007 Emissions from Power Plants and Other ... - MARAMA

State Primary Fuel NOx ControlCapacity Percent of State(MMBtu/hr FuelPA Pipeline Natural Gas Dry Low NOx Burners 1,067 1.1%PA Pipeline Natural Gas Dry Low NOx Burners Selective Catalytic Reduction 45,566 48.8%PA Pipeline Natural Gas Dry Low NOx Burners Water Injection 9,654 10.3%PA Pipeline Natural GasDry Low NOx Burners Water Injection AmmoniaInjection5,800 6.2%PA Pipeline Natural Gas Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) 381 0.4%PA Pipeline Natural Gas Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) Other 2,565 2.7%PA Pipeline Natural Gas Selective Catalytic Reduction Water Injection 2,754 2.9%PA Pipeline Natural Gas Steam Injection 2,370 2.5%PA Pipeline Natural Gas Water Injection 8,907 9.5%PA Pipeline Natural GasWater Injection Overfire Air Selective CatalyticReduction10,060 10.8%PA Process Gas 2,945 60.2%PA Process Gas Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) 1,950 39.8%PA Residual Oil 26,213 74.5%PA Residual Oil Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) 761 2.2%PA Residual Oil Other 8,232 23.4%RI Pipeline Natural Gas Dry Low NOx Burners Selective Catalytic Reduction 4,589 25.9%RI Pipeline Natural GasDry Low NOx Burners Selective Catalytic ReductionSteam Injection3,915 22.1%RI Pipeline Natural Gas Selective Catalytic Reduction 1,943 11.0%RI Pipeline Natural Gas Water Injection Selective Catalytic Reduction 7,300 41.1%VA Coal 2,349 3.5%VACoalCombustion Modification/Fuel Reburning Low NOxBurner Technology w/ Separated OFA4,823 7.2%VA Coal Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) 8,632 12.9%VA CoalLow NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only)Ammonia Injection322 0.5%VA Coal Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) Other 1,838 2.7%VAVACoalCoalLow NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only)Selective Catalytic ReductionLow NOx Burner Technology w/ Closedcoupled/SeparatedOFA Selective Catalytic1,717 2.6%7,206 10.7%Analysis of Emissions from Power Plants and Other Large Combustion Sources March 2011Page 99