12.07.2015 Views

Analysis of 2007 Emissions from Power Plants and Other ... - MARAMA

Analysis of 2007 Emissions from Power Plants and Other ... - MARAMA

Analysis of 2007 Emissions from Power Plants and Other ... - MARAMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State Primary Fuel NOx ControlReductionCapacity(MMBtu/hrPercent <strong>of</strong> StateFuelVA Coal Low NOx Burner Technology w/ Overfire Air 1,669 2.5%VACoalLow NOx Burner Technology w/ Separated OFASelective Catalytic Reduction3,604 5.4%VA CoalLow NOx Burner Technology w/ Separated OFASelective Non-catalytic Reduction3,623 5.4%VA Coal <strong>Other</strong> 5,344 8.0%VA Coal <strong>Other</strong> Overfire Air 507 0.8%VA Coal <strong>Other</strong> Selective Non-catalytic Reduction 2,758 4.1%VA Coal Overfire Air 3,856 5.7%VA Coal Overfire Air <strong>Other</strong> 440 0.7%VA Coal Overfire Air Selective Non-catalytic Reduction 1,548 2.3%VA Coal Selective Catalytic Reduction 4,782 7.1%VA Coal Selective Catalytic Reduction <strong>Other</strong> 1,761 2.6%VA Coal Selective Non-catalytic Reduction <strong>Other</strong> 10,300 15.4%VA Diesel Oil 460 12.6%VA Diesel Oil Water Injection 3,178 87.4%VA Natural Gas 325 43.3%VA Natural Gas Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) 425 56.7%VA Pipeline Natural Gas 285 0.3%VA Pipeline Natural Gas Dry Low NOx Burners Selective Catalytic Reduction 893 1.0%VAPipeline Natural GasDry Low NOx Burners Selective Catalytic ReductionSteam Injection6,248 7.3%VA Pipeline Natural Gas Dry Low NOx Burners Water Injection 28,692 33.7%VA Pipeline Natural GasDry Low NOx Burners Water Injection SelectiveCatalytic Reduction15,411 18.1%VA Pipeline Natural Gas Low NOx Burner Technology (Dry Bottom only) 254 0.3%VA Pipeline Natural Gas Low NOx Burner Technology w/ Closed-coupled OFA 3,686 4.3%VA Pipeline Natural Gas Selective Catalytic Reduction Steam Injection 2,486 2.9%VA Pipeline Natural Gas Steam Injection 8,511 1 %VA Pipeline Natural Gas Water Injection 18,621 21.9%March 2011 <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Other</strong> Large Combustion SourcesPage 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!