ncaa-manual

Bylaw, Article 22Institutional Performance Program22.01 General Principle.The central purpose of the institutional performance program of the Association shall be to validate the fundamentalintegrity of member institutions’ athletics programs through a verified and evaluated institutional selfstudy.The involvement of peer reviewers external to the institution shall provide the verification and evaluation ofthe methodology and results of the self-study. (Adopted: 1/16/93 effective 1/1/94, Revised: 1/19/13)22.1 Committee on Institutional Performance.The Administration Cabinet shall appoint a Committee on Institutional Performance that shall be responsible foradministration of the NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program. (Adopted: 1/19/13)22.1.1 Composition. The committee shall consist of 18 members and shall be constituted as follows: (Adopted:1/19/13)(a) One chancellor or president from each subdivision of Division I;(b) Two chancellors or presidents selected at large;(c) One chancellor or president who is a current member of the Division I Board of Directors;(d) Thirteen subject matter experts; and(e) One member of the Division I Student-Athlete Advisory Committee, who shall serve as a member of thecommittee in an advisory capacity and may serve on the committee up to one year after completion of his orher intercollegiate athletics eligibility.22.1.1.1 Chair. One chancellor or president shall serve as chair of the committee. (Adopted: 1/19/13)22.1.2 Duties. The duties of the Committee on Institutional Performance include, but are not limited to, makingrecommendations to the Division I Board of Directors related to the following: (Adopted: 1/19/13)(a) Establishment of an ongoing and efficient review process for all Division I institutions;(b) Development of a streamlined educational/orientation program for all Division I institutions;(c) Oversight and monitoring of submission deadlines and implementation of identified penalties for nonsubmission;(d) Consideration of an accountability/recognition spectrum;(e) Evaluation of the effectiveness and/or relevancy of current data to determine if new or more useful data pointsshould be added;(f) Re-evaluation of the committee composition once the institutional performance program is finalized;(g) Recommendation of ongoing changes to the program as necessary, including the adjustment of metrics basedon research data analysis and practical experience;(h) Determination of successful completion of the program for reclassifying institutions in collaboration with theAdministration Cabinet; and(i) Collaboration with the appropriate groups in the Division I governance structure to identify trends and proposechanges to Division I legislation, if necessary.22INSTITUTIONALPERFORMANCE PROGRAM22.2 Mandatory Self-Study and External Peer Review.Each member institution, at least once every 10 years, shall complete an institutional self-study, verified and evaluatedthrough external peer review. The self-study shall encompass the following operating principles in three basicareas as set forth in Bylaws 22.2.1, 22.2.2 and 22.2.3. (Note: Between April 28, 2011, and August 1, 2014, noactive Division I institution shall begin the institutional performance program process.) (Adopted: 1/16/93 effective1/1/94, Revised: 1/14/97 effective 8/1/97, 4/28/11, 4/26/12, 1/19/13)377