emaining partner. Thereafter, if the existing partner were to decline the offerof the full-time post, a new partner should be appointed in line with theCouncil’s appointments procedures. Should it not be possible to fill theremaining part of the job-share, the remaining partner should be offered eithera permanent part-time post or redeployed to a permanent part-time or full-timecontract. It is likely that, during the course of a job-share contract, thecircumstances of one or both partners may change and it should be open, atany time, for the job-share partners to seek agreement with the employer to analternative configuration of hours within the job-share total. If agreementcannot be reached, the job-share partners and the head of establishmentshould review the arrangements in time for the start of the following term orsession. Should agreement still not be possible, both partners should beoffered appropriate and suitable permanent part-time appointments.2.3 Delays in Filling Vacant Job-Share Partners Posts.- It has been reported on anumber of occasions that there are, often, significant delays in filling one orother of the job-share portions. On this basis, time limits should be included inlocal job-share agreements in order that, if another partner for the sharecannot be found, the procedures for dealing with the situation as a permanentvacancy should be initiated.2.4 Liaison Time.- Arrangements should be put in place which allows for a period ofoverlap during normal working hours in order to permit the sharers time toconsult with each other on matters related to curricular, pastoral and otherissues associated with their working commitments. It is suggested that classcontact remission of at least two hours per week is provided for the purposesof liaison.2.5 Incremental Progression.- Will be as outlined in Part 2, Section 1 of the SNCT<strong>Handbook</strong>.2.6 Reversion to Full-Time Working.- Again, it is well established within theEmployment Tribunal system and the Courts, that failure to permit part-time orjob-share working (particularly in relation to a return from maternity leave) isindirectly discriminatory. Requests for a reversion to full-time work from staffwho had previously been permitted to work on a job-share or part-time basiswill not be granted automatically but all such requests should be consideredboth seriously and timeously. It may also be helpful to introduce anaccelerated appeals mechanism for staff who have been refused a reversionto full-time working in order that final decisions can be arrived at as quickly aspossible. Once a decision has been taken to permit a return to full-time work,this should be implemented from the start of the following term or sessionwhichever is the earlier.2.7 Leave Arrangements and Public Holidays.- Under existing national agreementsall job-share and part-time staff are treated (albeit on a pro rata basis) in thesame way as permanent full-time staff as far as leave accrual, salary paymentand other conditions of service matters are concerned. However, a number oflocal associations and Area Officers have reported problems in relation to theallocation of public holidays between job-share partners. It is common practicefor one partner to work at the beginning of a week (i.e. up to Wednesday lunchtime) and for the other partner to complete the remainder of the week.However, with the preponderance of public holidays falling on a Monday, it ispossible that one partner in a 50:50 job-share will actually receive less interms of leave entitlement than the other. There are no straightforwardsolutions to this problem which keep intact important pro rata elements ofexisting national agreements covering salary and leave accrual rights. Thereare, however, two potential solutions to this problem which would require the86September 2012
agreement of the job-share partners, school management and the localauthority.(a)(b)Agreement could be reached at the commencement of each sessionwhich would allow for an even or pro rata allocation of public holidaysbetween the partners. In other words one partner would be required to“cover” for the other partner on a relatively small number of days duringthe course of a year to establish a proper balance.In a 50:50 job-share situation the actual fraction of annual salaryentitlement paid to each job-sharer could be amended slightly toaccommodate the small difference in working days (or hours) during thecourse of that salary year.2.8 Absence Cover.- Where one job-share partner is absent from work (forwhatever reason) the other partner should be offered the opportunity ofcovering for his/her partner. If the offer is accepted the covering partnershould be paid for this additional work on the appropriate daily or hourly ratefor temporary staff.87September 2012