- Page 1: COMPARISON OF 9.5 MM SUPERPAVE ANDM
- Page 5 and 6: iiiasphalt concrete wearing courses
- Page 7 and 8: vMixing Procedure 78Appendix B Fine
- Page 9 and 10: viiTable C-7 Marshall Medium 13% NS
- Page 13 and 14: 4Table 1.1 Mix Design Types in Expe
- Page 15 and 16: 6CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW2.1 INT
- Page 17 and 18: 82. determine aggregate stockpile b
- Page 19 and 20: 10SieveAllowable PercentPassing Sie
- Page 21 and 22: 12Stability is recorded as the maxi
- Page 23 and 24: 14The WVDOH procedure for determini
- Page 25 and 26: 16sieve. This is somewhat different
- Page 27 and 28: 18G sb = bulk specific gravity of a
- Page 29 and 30: 20theoretical gravity at the initia
- Page 31 and 32: 22D/B est = adjusted dust to binder
- Page 33 and 34: 24P b,est - 0.5%,P b,est ,P b,est +
- Page 35 and 36: Percent Passing261009080Superpave U
- Page 37 and 38: 28Table 2.6 WVDOH Marshall and Supe
- Page 39 and 40: 30Table 2.9 Habib Marshall Analysis
- Page 41 and 42: 32theoretically correct in that the
- Page 43 and 44: 34the machine. This variability was
- Page 45 and 46: 36CHAPTER 3 EQUIPMENT3.1 INTRODUCTI
- Page 47 and 48: 38Hose PressureWheel Load100 psi100
- Page 49 and 50: 40mouth. This jar rests on a holder
- Page 51 and 52: problematic, as the saturated surfa
- Page 53 and 54:
44Mechanical Laboratory Sieve. Afte
- Page 55 and 56:
Percent Passing4610090100% Limeston
- Page 57 and 58:
48Maximum specific gravity is a req
- Page 59 and 60:
50gradation. This allowed for direc
- Page 61 and 62:
Percent Passing521009080Light 100%
- Page 63 and 64:
54percentage of aggregate from the
- Page 65 and 66:
56Table 5.4 Summary of Volumetric a
- Page 67 and 68:
58Table 5.5 Calculated and Adjusted
- Page 69 and 70:
60Table 5.6 Results of APA TestsAir
- Page 71 and 72:
62exhibit lower rut depths than any
- Page 73 and 74:
design had significantly more rutti
- Page 75 and 76:
66SP L 100LS SP L 64NS -10.335 2.77
- Page 77 and 78:
68percent air voids and percent lim
- Page 79 and 80:
Air Voids (%)Uncompacted Voids (%)7
- Page 81 and 82:
72than the Marshall mixes. Table 6.
- Page 83 and 84:
Voids in the Mineral Aggregate. As
- Page 85 and 86:
76REFERENCESAmerican Association of
- Page 87 and 88:
78APPENDIX A BUCKET MIXER INSTRUCTI
- Page 89 and 90:
80APPENDIX B FINE AGGREGATE ANGULAR
- Page 91 and 92:
82Table B-3 Uncompacted Void Conten
- Page 93 and 94:
84AGGREGATE DESIGN DATATable C-1 St
- Page 95 and 96:
86Table C-3 Computed Blend Gradatio
- Page 97 and 98:
88Table C-7 Marshall Medium 13% NS
- Page 99 and 100:
90%G mm%AC VMA VTM VFA @ N ini @N d
- Page 101 and 102:
92Table C-14 Superpave Light 64% NS
- Page 103:
946 2979.3 1696.7 2988.1 2.307 7.09
- Page 106 and 107:
971 2912.7 1620.8 2917.9 2.246 7.65
- Page 108 and 109:
992 8.40 10.80 7.402 7.90 9.90 7.80
- Page 110 and 111:
1011 9.50 6.90 11.502 9.79 7.15 10.
- Page 112 and 113:
1032 8.55 5.20 5.95L R RDate Tested