Comparison of 9.5 mm SuperPave and Marshall Wearing I Mixes in ...
Comparison of 9.5 mm SuperPave and Marshall Wearing I Mixes in ...
Comparison of 9.5 mm SuperPave and Marshall Wearing I Mixes in ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
555.2.4 Specimen Test<strong>in</strong>gSuperpave mix design relies solely volumetric properties <strong>of</strong> the mix. No physical test is currentlyrequired. However, the APA test developed by the Georgia DOT is ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g popularity withvarious state agencies <strong>and</strong> researchers.Test<strong>in</strong>g was conducted on all specimens along the range <strong>of</strong> asphalt contents tested <strong>and</strong> values<strong>in</strong>putted <strong>in</strong>to an Excel spreadsheet progra<strong>mm</strong>ed specifically for Superpave. This program thencalculated the air voids, VMA <strong>and</strong> VFA from the measured bulk weights <strong>of</strong> each specimen <strong>and</strong>graphs made <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these properties versus asphalt content.From the graphs developed by the spreadsheet, the asphalt content correspond<strong>in</strong>g with 4% airvoids was determ<strong>in</strong>ed. This asphalt content was the design asphalt content. VMA <strong>and</strong> VFAvalues <strong>of</strong> the mix were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the values for each that corresponded with thedesign asphalt content. Volumetric values were then checked for compliance with requiredvalues set forth by Superpave.Once the optimum asphalt content has been found, a set <strong>of</strong> N max specimens were prepared. Ifthe sample met Superpave specifications, then the mix was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be an acceptable mix.5.2.5 Mix Design ResultsResults <strong>of</strong> the Superpave designs were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g an Excel spreadsheet. Tables <strong>and</strong> graphsconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the full mix design data for each Superpave mix design are presented <strong>in</strong> Appendix C<strong>and</strong> are su<strong>mm</strong>arized <strong>in</strong> Table 5.4.All properties were with<strong>in</strong> WVDOH specifications except for those <strong>in</strong>dicated by the heavy boxes.As <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4 the f<strong>in</strong>e aggregate used did not meet the specifications for heavytraffic volume design. As expected the 100% limestone mixes exhibited a higher FAA value thanthat <strong>of</strong> the mixes conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 13% natural s<strong>and</strong>. Another source for s<strong>and</strong> was not sought to raisethis value above the m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> 45 needed to meet requirements due to the need to keep thes<strong>and</strong> content consistent throughout the research. This allowed for accurate comparisons to bemade without the added complication <strong>of</strong> consider<strong>in</strong>g variations <strong>in</strong> material properties.