Comparison of 9.5 mm SuperPave and Marshall Wearing I Mixes in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

65Table 6.2 Comparison of Superpave Mixes Rutting PotentialComparison T-statistic CriticalT-valueReject nullhypothesis(Y / N)SP 100% LS SP with NS -2.549 2.120 YSP H 100LS SP H 13NS -1.302 2.776 NSP H 100LS SP H 13NS -1.302 2.776 NSP H 100LS SP L 100LS 1.398 2.776 NSP H 100LS SP L 40NS -4.909 2.776 YSP H 100LS SP M 100LS -1.202 2.776 NSP H 100LS SP M 100LS -1.202 2.776 NSP H 100LS SP M 13NS -0.370 2.776 NSP H 100LS SP M 13NS -0.370 2.776 NSP H 13NS SP L 40NS -4.820 2.776 YSP H 13NS SP M 13NS 0.741 2.776 NSP H 13NS SP M 13NS 0.741 2.776 NSP M 100LS SP H 13NS -0.260 2.776 NSP M 100LS SP H 13NS -0.260 2.776 NSP M 100LS SP L 100LS 3.053 2.776 YSP M 100LS SP L 40NS -5.384 2.776 YSP M 100LS SP M 13NS 0.619 2.776 NSP M 100LS SP M 13NS 0.619 2.776 NSP M 13NS SP L 40NS -4.133 2.776 YSP L 100LS SP H 13NS -3.052 2.776 YSP L 100LS SP L 100LS (MOD) 0.463 2.776 NSP L 100LS SP L 40NS -6.517 2.776 YSP L 100LS SP L 40NS -6.517 2.776 Y
66SP L 100LS SP L 64NS -10.335 2.776 YSP L 100LS SP M 13NS -1.678 2.776 NSP L 100LS (MOD) SP L 40NS 8.842 2.776 YSP L 40NS SP L 64NS -2.644 2.776 NSP L 100LS (MOD) SP L 64NS 16.893 2.776 YTable 6.3 Comparison of Marshall Mixes Rutting PotentialComparison T-statistic CriticalT-valueReject nullhypothesis(Y / N)MR H 100LS MR H 13NS -8.170 2.776 YMR H 100LS MR M 100LS 0.130 2.776 NMR H 100LS MR M 13NS -3.220 2.776 YMR H 13NS MR M 13NS 5.012 2.776 YMR H 13NS MR M 100LS -3.430 2.776 YMR M 100LS MR M 13NS -1.047 2.776 N
Page 1 and 2:
COMPARISON OF 9.5 MM SUPERPAVE ANDM
Page 3 and 4:
iNOTICEThe contents of this report
Page 5 and 6:
iiiasphalt concrete wearing courses
Page 7 and 8:
vMixing Procedure 78Appendix B Fine
Page 9 and 10:
viiTable C-7 Marshall Medium 13% NS
Page 13 and 14:
4Table 1.1 Mix Design Types in Expe
Page 15 and 16:
6CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW2.1 INT
Page 17 and 18:
82. determine aggregate stockpile b
Page 19 and 20:
10SieveAllowable PercentPassing Sie
Page 21 and 22:
12Stability is recorded as the maxi
Page 23 and 24: 14The WVDOH procedure for determini
Page 25 and 26: 16sieve. This is somewhat different
Page 27 and 28: 18G sb = bulk specific gravity of a
Page 29 and 30: 20theoretical gravity at the initia
Page 31 and 32: 22D/B est = adjusted dust to binder
Page 33 and 34: 24P b,est - 0.5%,P b,est ,P b,est +
Page 35 and 36: Percent Passing261009080Superpave U
Page 37 and 38: 28Table 2.6 WVDOH Marshall and Supe
Page 39 and 40: 30Table 2.9 Habib Marshall Analysis
Page 41 and 42: 32theoretically correct in that the
Page 43 and 44: 34the machine. This variability was
Page 45 and 46: 36CHAPTER 3 EQUIPMENT3.1 INTRODUCTI
Page 47 and 48: 38Hose PressureWheel Load100 psi100
Page 49 and 50: 40mouth. This jar rests on a holder
Page 51 and 52: problematic, as the saturated surfa
Page 53 and 54: 44Mechanical Laboratory Sieve. Afte
Page 55 and 56: Percent Passing4610090100% Limeston
Page 57 and 58: 48Maximum specific gravity is a req
Page 59 and 60: 50gradation. This allowed for direc
Page 61 and 62: Percent Passing521009080Light 100%
Page 63 and 64: 54percentage of aggregate from the
Page 65 and 66: 56Table 5.4 Summary of Volumetric a
Page 67 and 68: 58Table 5.5 Calculated and Adjusted
Page 69 and 70: 60Table 5.6 Results of APA TestsAir
Page 71 and 72: 62exhibit lower rut depths than any
Page 73: design had significantly more rutti
Page 77 and 78: 68percent air voids and percent lim
Page 79 and 80: Air Voids (%)Uncompacted Voids (%)7
Page 81 and 82: 72than the Marshall mixes. Table 6.
Page 83 and 84: Voids in the Mineral Aggregate. As
Page 85 and 86: 76REFERENCESAmerican Association of
Page 87 and 88: 78APPENDIX A BUCKET MIXER INSTRUCTI
Page 89 and 90: 80APPENDIX B FINE AGGREGATE ANGULAR
Page 91 and 92: 82Table B-3 Uncompacted Void Conten
Page 93 and 94: 84AGGREGATE DESIGN DATATable C-1 St
Page 95 and 96: 86Table C-3 Computed Blend Gradatio
Page 97 and 98: 88Table C-7 Marshall Medium 13% NS
Page 99 and 100: 90%G mm%AC VMA VTM VFA @ N ini @N d
Page 101 and 102: 92Table C-14 Superpave Light 64% NS
Page 103: 946 2979.3 1696.7 2988.1 2.307 7.09
Page 106 and 107: 971 2912.7 1620.8 2917.9 2.246 7.65
Page 108 and 109: 992 8.40 10.80 7.402 7.90 9.90 7.80
Page 110 and 111: 1011 9.50 6.90 11.502 9.79 7.15 10.
Page 112 and 113: 1032 8.55 5.20 5.95L R RDate Tested
show all

Comparison of 9.5 mm SuperPave and Marshall Wearing I Mixes in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?