13.07.2015 Views

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Inadequate weight gain - aOR 0.95 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02 (1 st trimester) <strong>and</strong> aOR 0.99 95% CI 0.92 to 1.07 (2 ndtrimester)In this study, no significant associations were seen between AHEI-P scores <strong>and</strong> gestational diabetes mellitus: AHEI-P score (per 5 points)aOR 0.97 95% CI 0.87 to 1.08 (1 st trimester)aOR 0.98 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09) (2 nd trimester)6. In a cohort study from Icel<strong>and</strong>, eating more in early pregnancy was not significantly associated with either atleast optimal gestational weight gain or excessive gestational weight gain, but eating more in late pregnancywas associated with significant increases in at least optimal gestational weight gain (aOR 3.32 95% CI 1.81to 6.09) <strong>and</strong> excessive gestational weight gain (aOR 2.04 95% CI 1.17 to 3.58)7. In a US cohort study, a vegetarian diet was associated with lower odds of excessive gestational weight gainin the first trimester (aOR 0.45 95% CI 0.27 to 0.76) but not the second trimester (aOR 0.70 95% CI 0.40 to1.20)8. In a nonr<strong>and</strong>omised intervention study from Finl<strong>and</strong>, meal pattern advice <strong>and</strong> advice to consume plenty offruits, vegetables <strong>and</strong> high fibre bread <strong>and</strong> to restrict high sugar snacks in late pregnancy was not associatedwith excessive gestational weight gain (aOR 1.82 95% CI 0.65 to 5.14)9. In a US RCT, women allocated to a dietary avoidance regimen during pregnancy compared with womenwith a st<strong>and</strong>ard diet, showed a significant reduction in third trimester weight gain (MD -1.24 kg 95% CI -1.30 to -1.18)10. In a US cohort study, diagnosis of GDM, or a diagnosis of either GDM or IGT, were not associated with: A western diet during pregnancy (red <strong>and</strong> processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages, French fries, highfatdairy products, desserts, butter <strong>and</strong> refined grains); p for trend across quartiles for GDM = 0.80; A prudent diet during pregnancy (high in vegetables, fruit, legumes, fish, poultry, eggs, salad dressing, <strong>and</strong>whole grains); p for trend across quartiles for GDM = 0.3511. In a US cohort study, diagnosis of GDM wasNegatively associated with: A prudent pre-pregnancy <strong>and</strong> pregnancy (fruits, green leafy vegetables, poultry <strong>and</strong> fish): p for trend acrossquintiles = 0.017 (adjusted)Positively associated with: a western pre-pregnancy <strong>and</strong> pregnancy diet (red meat, processed meat, refined grain products, sweets,desserts, French fries <strong>and</strong> pizzas); p for trend across quintiles = 0.0011 (adjusted)No longer positively associated with: a western pre-pregnancy <strong>and</strong> pregnancy diet when adjusted for red <strong>and</strong> processed meat consumption (p fortrend across quintiles = 0.697 (adjusted)495 II Olafsdottir 20061338 II Stuebe 2009132 III-2 Kinnunen 2007a98 II(RCT)Zeiger 19891773 II Radesky 200813,110 II Zhang 2006Dietary guidelines for pregnant <strong>and</strong> <strong>breastfeeding</strong> women: evidence report14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!