13.07.2015 Views

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

maternal atopyInhalant sensitisation (positive skin prick test for a range of allergens)n/N OR (95%) aOR (95% CI) p-value for trendAllergic mothers≤ 1 serve/month 27/62 (43.5%) 1 1 0.761 serve/week 63/138 (50.7%) 1.33 (0.73 to 2.43) 0.89 (0.30 to 2.60)≥2-3 serves/week 48/83 (42.2%) 0.94 (0.48 to 1.83) 0.74 (0.23 to 2.37)*adjusted for age, number of older siblings, allergy clinics, maternal age, gestation age, gender, maternal education, paternal atopy,maternal atopyNon-allergic mothers≤ 1 serve/month 69/136 (50.7%) 1 1 0.621 serve/week 137/330 (41.5%) 0.68 (0.46 to 1.02) 0.70 (0.38 to 1.30)≥2-3 serves/week 92/197 (46.7%) 0.85 (0.54 to 1.31) 0.55 (0.28 to 1.08)*adjusted for age, gender, number of older siblings, allergy clinics, maternal age, number of pregnancies, maternal occupation, paternalatopy, asthma, oculorhinitisInhalant sensitisation in whole population:≥2-3 serves/week: aOR* 0.57 95% CI 0.32 to 1.03*adjusted for age, gender, oculorhinitis, asthma, number of older siblings, allergy clinics, maternal age, number of pregnancies, maternaleducation, preterm labour, paternal atopy, maternal atopy: did not vary significantly with amount of butter intakeFollowupNAConfoundingAnalyses only adjusted for a limited number of factors; different factors were used for the analyses of allergic <strong>and</strong> non-allergic mothers; <strong>and</strong> for food <strong>and</strong>inhalant sensitisations (included if significant in univariate analyses).Risk of bias Moderate risk of bias: recall bias likely for women remembering diet during a pregnancy up to 17 years earlier; data for maternal atopy available for 988of the 1044 consecutively recruited children (94.6%); data for maternal fish intake during pregnancy available for 946/988 (95.7%); children attendingallergy clinics likely to be different for a general population of children.RelevanceDiets of pregnant Italian women may differ from those of Australian women e.g. there were low levels of maternal margarine <strong>and</strong> butter consumption inthis studyOther comments Clinical significance of skin prick tests?Wide age range (1 to 18?) makes interpretation of allergic sensitisations difficultDietary guidelines for pregnant <strong>and</strong> <strong>breastfeeding</strong> women: evidence report268

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!