13.07.2015 Views

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ReferenceKinnunen 2007bDietary patterns Advice to 1) have a regular meal pattern, emphasising the importance of breakfast <strong>and</strong> at least one hot meal every day; 2) to eat at least 5 portions (400g) per day of different kinds of vegetables, fruits <strong>and</strong> berries, 3) to consume mostly high fibre bread (≥ 5 g fibre/100 g) <strong>and</strong> 4) to restrict the intake ofhigh-sugar snacks to ≤ 1 portion per day (e.g. 50 g sweets, one pastry, one piece of cake, two biscuits, 2 dl ice cream or a glass of soft drink) [plusadvice to be physically active]Study typeControlled trial (ISRCTN21512277)Level of evidence III-2 (nonr<strong>and</strong>omised concurrent comparison; interventions)SettingSix antenatal clinics in Finl<strong>and</strong> (three intervention; three control)FundingUS NIH, Ministry of Education <strong>and</strong> Ministry of Social Affairs <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, Finl<strong>and</strong>, Doctoral Programs in Public <strong>Health</strong>, Finl<strong>and</strong>Participants 92 postpartum primiparas; recruited between August 2004 <strong>and</strong> January 2005Exclusion criteria: under 18 years of age, type I or II diabetes mellitus (but not GDM), twin pregnancy, physical disability that prevents exercising,otherwise problematic pregnancy, substance abuse, treatment or clinical history for any psychiatric illness, inability to speak Finnish <strong>and</strong> intention tochange residence within 3 months.Baseline comparisons Characteristics of women in the intervention <strong>and</strong> control groups were not significantly differentDietary assessment FFQTiming2, 5, 6 <strong>and</strong> 10 months postpartumComparisonIntervention (dietary <strong>and</strong> physical activity counselling from 2 to 10 months postpartum) versus st<strong>and</strong>ard antenatal careOutcomesAchieving recommended dietary pattern; gestational weight retentionResultsIntervention (n = 46) Control (n = 37) aOR/MD (95% CI)Retained ≤ 0 kg at 10 m pp* 23 (50%) 11 (30%) 3.89 (1.16 to 13.04)Weight retention, mean (kg, SD) at m pp 1.8 [4.3] 1.0 [4.4] 0.8 (-1.1 to 2.7)Waist circumf at 10 months pp, mean (cm SD) 78.1 [10.2] 75.4 [6.2] 1.0 (0.7 to 2.7)Veg, fruit, beries (prtions/day) at 10 m pp** 2.6 [1.4] (n = 44) 2.5 [2.1] (n = 37)Adj mean difference = +0.2 95% CI -0.3 to 0.8High-fibre bread (% total bread) at 10 mpp** 65 [27] (n = 44) 52 [31] (n = 37)Adj mean difference = + 16.1 95% CI 4.3 to 27.9High-sugar snacks (portions/day) at 10 mpp** 2.1 [1.2] (n = 44) 2.1 [1.4] (n = 37)Adj mean difference = 0.0 95% CI -0.6 to 0.6)FollowupConfoundingRisk of biasRelevanceOther commentsTo 10 months posptpartum*Adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, gestational weight gain, weight at 2 months postpartum, duration of exclusive <strong>breastfeeding</strong> <strong>and</strong>smoking status**baseline intake of the outcome variable, age, education, smoking status, gesational weight gain <strong>and</strong> BMI at 2 months postpartumModerate risk of bias: 5/53 (9%) lost to followup in the intervention group <strong>and</strong> 2/39 (5%) in the control group; three clinics volunteered to be interventionclinics <strong>and</strong> the other three clinics were controlsLikely to be reasonably relevant to Australian womenUnderpowered; pilot for a larger studyPregnancy <strong>and</strong> Breastfeeding Dietary Patterns37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!