Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Reference Venter 2009Food groupsNuts: peanutsStudy typeProspective cohortLevel of evidence II (aetiology)SettingPortsmouth, UKFundingFood Standards AgencyParticipants 969 pregnant women at 12 weeks gestation (with estimated birth date between 1 September 2001 and 31 August 2002)Baseline comparisons Pregnant women with a maternal history of atopic disease were more likely to smokeDietary assessment FFQTimingFFQ at 36 weeks gestationComparisonNo (54% of women) versus moderate (44%) versus frequent (2%) versus uncertain (
Reference Willers 2008Food typeNuts and nut productsStudy typeProspective cohort (longitudinal)Level of evidence II (aetiology)SettingNetherlandsFundingNetherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research; Netherlands Asthma Fund;Netherlands Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing, and the Environment; Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, GlaxoSmithKlineParticipants2,832 children (part of the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy (PIAMA) birth cohort studyBaseline comparisons See confounding belowDietaryFFQassessmentTimingFFQ administered at antenatal recruitment (mean gestational ages not reported) to cover dietary intake over the previous monthComparisonNuts: daily (once per day or more) or regular v rare consumption;Nut products: daily v regular v rare consumptionOutcomesWheeze, dyspnoea, prescription of inhaled steroids for respiratory problems, composite variable ‘asthma symptoms’ in the last 12 months (measuredlongitudinally from 1 to 8 years age); IgE at 8 years for a subset of childrenResultsNUTSWheeze from 1 to 8 years age (n = 2806)OR 0.96 95% CI 0.83 to 1.12aOR 0.99 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15Dyspnoea from 1 to 8 years age (n = 2806)OR 1.00 95% CI 0.82 to 1.19aOR 1.04 95% CI 0.88 to 1.23Steroid use from 1 to 8 years age (n = 2806)OR 0.95 95% CI 0.75 to 1.19aOR 1.03 95% CI 0.81 to 1.29Asthma symptoms (composite of previous three outcomes) from 1 to 8 years age (n = 2806)OR 0.96 95% CI 0.82 to 1.11aOR 1.00 95% CI 0.86 to 1.17NUT PRODUCTSWheeze from 1 to 8 years age (n = 2806)Regular v rareOR 1.04 95% CI 0.90 to 1.21aOR 1.01 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18Daily v rareOR 1.39 95% CI 1.05 to 1.86aOR 1.42 95% CI 1.06 to 1.89Nuts and SeedsDyspnoea from 1 to 8 years age (n = 2806)Regular v rareOR 0.99 95% CI 0.82 to 1.18473
Page 1 and 2:
Literature Review: Pregnant andbrea
Page 3 and 4:
References ........................
Page 5 and 6:
Salt / Sodium .....................
Page 7 and 8:
AbbreviationSRSSBMeaningSystematic
Page 9 and 10:
Inclusion and exclusion criteriaStu
Page 11 and 12:
Pregnancy and breastfeeding dietary
Page 13 and 14:
Evidence SummariesMother1. In a Nor
Page 15 and 16:
12. In a Cochrane systematic review
Page 17 and 18:
o ‘western’ diet 3583 [525]o
Page 19 and 20:
Breastfeeding35. In a nonrandomised
Page 21:
Other Childhood Outcomes47. In a co
Page 24 and 25:
Reference Brantsaeter 2009Dietary p
Page 26 and 27:
Reference Cole 2009Dietary patterns
Page 28 and 29:
Reference De Batlle 2008Dietary pat
Page 30 and 31:
ReferenceFood typeStudy typeLevel o
Page 32 and 33:
Reference Haugen 2008Dietary patter
Page 34 and 35:
Reference Haugen 2005Dietary patter
Page 36 and 37:
ReferenceKinnunen 2007aDietary patt
Page 38 and 39:
Reference Knudsen 2008Dietary patte
Page 40 and 41:
Reference Koebnick 2001Dietary patt
Page 42 and 43:
Prudent:OR 0.98 95% CI 0.82 to 1.18
Page 44 and 45:
Reference Laraia 2007Dietary patter
Page 46 and 47:
FollowupTo birthConfoundingAdjusted
Page 48 and 49:
Reference North 2000Dietary pattern
Page 50 and 51:
Reference Radesky 2008Food typePrud
Page 52 and 53:
Reference Rifas-Shiman 2009Dietary
Page 54 and 55:
Reference Robinson 2007Dietary patt
Page 56 and 57:
Risk of biasRelevanceOther comments
Page 58 and 59:
Reference Shaheen 2009Dietary patte
Page 60 and 61:
Traditional 0.02 (-0.01 to 0.05) 0.
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Reference Thompson 2010Dietary patt
Page 66 and 67:
Reference Uusitalo 2009Dietary patt
Page 68 and 69:
Reference Vujkovic 2009Dietary patt
Page 70 and 71:
Confounding 1) Western diet adjuste
Page 72 and 73:
Reference Xiang 2005Dietary pattern
Page 74 and 75:
FollowupConfoundingRisk of biasMate
Page 76 and 77:
Reference Zhang 2006Food typePruden
Page 78 and 79:
Koebnick C, Hoffmann I, Dagnelie PC
Page 80 and 81:
Included StudiesCaffeineStudyOutcom
Page 82 and 83:
10. In the eleven studies (includin
Page 84 and 85:
Evidence TablesReference Adeney 200
Page 86 and 87:
2-3.9 caffeine units/day aOR 1.08 (
Page 88 and 89:
Reference Chen 2009Food groupsCaffe
Page 90 and 91:
ReferenceGreenwood 2010 (CARE group
Page 92 and 93:
Reference Knox 1972Food typeCaffein
Page 94 and 95:
Reference Leviton 2002Food typeCaff
Page 96 and 97:
control mothers. No adjustment for
Page 98 and 99:
Perinatal Deaths Tebbutt 1984 (39 w
Page 100 and 101:
studies e.g. 300 mg/day) no associa
Page 102 and 103:
Associations with spina bifida were
Page 104 and 105:
Reference Robinson 2009Food groupCa
Page 106 and 107:
Included StudiesCerealStudyOutcomes
Page 108 and 109:
nonlactating women significantly re
Page 110 and 111:
Evidence TableReference Chatzi 2008
Page 112 and 113:
Reference Godfrey 1996Food typeCere
Page 114 and 115:
Reference Jensen 2004Food typeCerea
Page 116 and 117:
Reference Kwan 2009Food typeCereals
Page 118 and 119:
Reference Laraia 2007Dietary patter
Page 120 and 121:
Reference Mitchell 2004Dietary patt
Page 122 and 123:
Reference Petridou 2005Food typeCer
Page 124 and 125:
ReferencePetridou 1998bFood type Ce
Page 126 and 127:
Reference Stuebe 2009Dietary patter
Page 128 and 129:
Reference Willers 2007Food typeCere
Page 130 and 131:
Q3 (4.6 to 5.6) 136/20,229 0.83 (0.
Page 132 and 133:
Stuebe AM, Oken E and Gillman MW. "
Page 134 and 135:
29. Miyake 2006 Postpartum depressi
Page 136 and 137:
12. In a UK case-control study, the
Page 138 and 139:
25. In a US RCT, adolescent women r
Page 140 and 141:
childhood brain tumours (medullobla
Page 142 and 143:
Reference Campbell-Brown 1983Food t
Page 144 and 145:
Reference Chang 2003Food typeDairy
Page 146 and 147:
Reference Chatzi 2008Food typeDairy
Page 148:
Reference Elwood 1981Food typeDairy
Page 151 and 152:
Reference George 2005Food typeDairy
Page 153 and 154:
Reference Giordano 2008Food typeDai
Page 155 and 156:
Reference Haggarty 2009Dietary patt
Page 157 and 158:
Reference Jakobbson 1983Dietary pat
Page 159 and 160:
Reference Javaid 2005Food typeDairy
Page 161 and 162:
Reference Jensen 2004Food typeDairy
Page 163 and 164:
Reference Knox 1972Food typeDairy f
Page 165 and 166:
Reference Lagiou 2006Food typeDairy
Page 167 and 168:
Reference Latva-Pukkila 2009Dietary
Page 169 and 170:
difference between total allergy in
Page 171 and 172:
Reference Mannion 2006Food typeDair
Page 173 and 174:
Calcium supplementationNo ŧ 77 1.0
Page 175 and 176:
Reference Miyake 2006Food groupsDai
Page 177 and 178:
Reference Nwaru 2010Food typeDairy
Page 179 and 180:
Reference Olafsdottir 2006Dietary p
Page 181 and 182:
P for trend 4 6 glasses of milk/d h
Page 183 and 184:
Reference Petridou 2005Food typeMil
Page 185 and 186:
Reference Richardson 1995Food typeM
Page 187 and 188:
Reference Saito 2010Food typeDairy
Page 189 and 190:
Reference Stuebe 2009Dietary patter
Page 191 and 192:
Women in the supplemented group int
Page 193 and 194:
Reference Willers 2007Food typeDair
Page 195 and 196:
Reference Yin 2010 (see also Jones
Page 197 and 198:
Jensen CD, Block G, Buffler P, Ma X
Page 199 and 200:
Included StudiesDairy foods and egg
Page 201 and 202:
Evidence TablesReference Cant 1986F
Page 203 and 204:
Reference Lilja 1988 (1989, 1991) -
Page 205 and 206:
Tumour SubtypesAstrocytomasPilocyti
Page 207 and 208:
Included StudiesEggsStudyOutcomes1.
Page 209 and 210:
11. In a cohort study from the Neth
Page 211 and 212:
Reference George 2005Food typeEggsS
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Reference Jensen 2004Food typeEggsS
Page 217 and 218:
Reference Maconochie 2007Food group
Page 219 and 220:
Reference Nwaru 2010Food typeEggsSt
Page 221 and 222:
Reference Sausenthaler 2007Food gro
Page 223 and 224:
Reference Willers 2008Food typeEggs
Page 225 and 226:
Included StudiesFats and OilsStudyO
Page 227 and 228:
11. In an Italian case-control stud
Page 229 and 230:
Evidence TablesReference Calvani 20
Page 231 and 232:
Reference Fard 2004Dietary patterns
Page 233 and 234:
Reference George 2005Food typeFoods
Page 235 and 236:
Risk of bias Moderate risk of bias:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Reference Khoury 2007Food type“Ch
Page 241 and 242:
Reference Mellies 1978; 1979Dietary
Page 243 and 244:
Reference Nwaru 2010Food typeFats a
Page 245 and 246:
Reference Petridou 1998Food typeFat
Page 247 and 248:
Reference Signorello 1998Food group
Page 249 and 250:
Reference Willers 2007Food typeFats
Page 251 and 252:
Petridou E, Koussouri M, Toupadaki
Page 253 and 254:
30. Miyake 2006 Postpartum depressi
Page 255 and 256:
Evidence SummaryPre-Pregnancy1. In
Page 257 and 258:
canned tuna (p = 0.01 for weight) b
Page 259 and 260:
1.02 95% CI 0.82 to 1.2635. In a Ja
Page 261 and 262:
Maternal Outcomes - Postnatal54. In
Page 263 and 264:
Evidence TablesReference Akre 2008F
Page 265 and 266:
Reference Buck 2003Food typeFishStu
Page 267 and 268:
Reference Calvani 2006Food typeFish
Page 269 and 270:
Reference Chatzi 2008Food typeFishS
Page 271 and 272:
Vocabulary comprehension 1 0.8 (0.6
Page 273 and 274:
Oily fish consumption Never
Page 275 and 276:
Reference Giordano 2008Food typeFis
Page 277 and 278:
Reference Golding 2009Food typeFish
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Reference Halldorsson 2008Food grou
Page 283 and 284:
Reference Hibbeln 2007Food groupsSe
Page 285 and 286:
Reference Jedrychowski 2010Dietary
Page 287 and 288:
Reference Jensen 2004Food typeFish:
Page 289 and 290:
Reference Lamb 2008Dietary patterns
Page 291 and 292:
Reference Lauritzen 2005a; Lauritze
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Reference Mendez 2009Food groupsFis
Page 297 and 298:
Reference Mitchell 2004Dietary patt
Page 299 and 300:
Reference Miyake 2006Food groupsFis
Page 301 and 302:
Reference Oien 2010Food typeFish:St
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Reference Oken 2007Food typeFishStu
Page 307 and 308:
Reference Oken 2004Food typeFish (c
Page 309 and 310:
Reference Olsen 1993Food typeFishSt
Page 311 and 312:
All 6517 282.1 [10.4]Multiple regre
Page 313 and 314:
ReferenceFood typeStudy typeLevel o
Page 315 and 316:
Other typesMalignant gliomas(122 ca
Page 317 and 318:
Follow-upConfoundingRisk of biasRel
Page 319 and 320:
Reference Romieu 2007Food typeFishS
Page 321 and 322:
Reference Salam 2005Food typeFishSt
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Reference Shiell 2001Food groupsFis
Page 327 and 328:
Reference Strain 2008; Davidson 200
Page 329 and 330:
RelevanceOther commentsoutcomes.Tho
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
12 years 331 0.69 0.03 015 years
Page 335 and 336:
Reference Willers 2007Food typeFish
Page 337 and 338:
Reference Willers 2008Food typeFish
Page 339 and 340:
Follow-upConfoundingRisk of biasRel
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Haggarty P, Campbell DM, Duthie S,
Page 345 and 346:
Oken E, Radesky JS, Wright RO, Bell
Page 347 and 348:
Included StudiesFruitFruitStudyOutc
Page 349 and 350:
and canned peaches, pears, pineappl
Page 351 and 352:
0.22 to 0.70)24. In a North America
Page 353 and 354:
2-4/wk 133 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2) 124 0.7
Page 355 and 356:
Reference Chatzi 2008Food typeFruit
Page 357 and 358:
Reference Giordano 2010Food typeFru
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Reference Jones 2000 (see also Yin
Page 363 and 364:
Reference Knox 1972Food typeFruit:
Page 365 and 366:
Reference Lamb 2008Dietary patterns
Page 367 and 368:
Reference Li 2009Dietary patterns F
Page 369 and 370:
Reference Mikkelsen 2006Food typeFr
Page 371 and 372:
Reference Miyake 2010Food typeFruit
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Reference Petridou 1998Food typeFru
Page 377 and 378:
RelevanceOther commentsMore general
Page 379 and 380:
Reference Willers 2007Food typeFrui
Page 381 and 382:
Reference Willers 2008Food typeFrui
Page 383 and 384:
Reference Zhang 2006Food typeFruit
Page 385 and 386:
ReferencesBunin GR, Kushi LH, Galla
Page 387 and 388:
Included StudiesFruit & VegetablesS
Page 389 and 390:
9. In a US case-control study, mate
Page 391 and 392:
Other commentsFat consisted of pure
Page 393 and 394:
Reference Hoppu 2005Dietary pattern
Page 395 and 396:
Reference Li 2009Dietary patterns F
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Reference Spector 2005Dietary patte
Page 401 and 402:
ReferencesFitzsimon N, Fallon U, O'
Page 403 and 404:
Evidence StatementsMaternal Outcome
Page 405 and 406:
Evidence TablesReference Bunin 2005
Page 407 and 408:
Reference Giordano 2008Food typeLeg
Page 409 and 410:
Reference Knox 1972Food typeLegumes
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Reference Pierik 2004Food typeSoy p
Page 415 and 416:
MeatIncluded StudiesStudyOutcomes1.
Page 417 and 418:
Evidence SummariesMaternal Outcomes
Page 419 and 420:
17. In a follow-up study of Saito 2
Page 421 and 422: Evidence TablesReference Akre 2008F
Page 425 and 426: Reference Bunin 1993Food typeCured
Page 427 and 428: Reference George 2005Food typeMeat
Page 429 and 430: Reference Giordano 2008Food typeMea
Page 431 and 432: Reference Godfrey 1996Food typeMeat
Page 433 and 434: Reference Jensen 2004Food typeMeat:
Page 435 and 436: Reference Knox 1972Food typeMeat (t
Page 437 and 438: Reference Lamb 2008Dietary patterns
Page 439 and 440: Reference Maconochie 2007Food group
Page 441 and 442: Reference Mitchell 2004Dietary patt
Page 443 and 444: Reference Miyake 2006Food groupsMea
Page 445 and 446: Reference Petridou 2005Food typeMea
Page 447 and 448: Reference Pogoda 2009Food typeMeat:
Page 449 and 450: Reference Pogoda 2001Food typeCured
Page 451 and 452: Reference Radesky 2008Food typeMeat
Page 453 and 454: Reference Sarasua 1994Food typeMeat
Page 455 and 456: Reference Shiell 2001Food groupsMea
Page 457 and 458: Reference Yin 2010 (see also Jones
Page 459 and 460: Number of cases of GDM 328 333 97Pe
Page 461 and 462: Latva-Pukkila U, Isolauri E and Lai
Page 463 and 464: Included StudiesNuts and SeedsStudy
Page 465 and 466: Evidence TablesReference Chatzi 200
Page 467 and 468: Reference Hourihane 1996Dietary pat
Page 469 and 470: Reference Sausenthaler 2007Food gro
Page 471: Reference Vadas 2001Food groupsPean
Page 475 and 476: ReferencesChatzi L, Torrent M, Romi
Page 477 and 478: Evidence summariesMaternal Outcomes
Page 479 and 480: Reference Duley 1999 and 2005Food t
Page 481 and 482: Reference Morris 2001Food typeSaltS
Page 483 and 484: Included StudiesSugarStudyOutcomes1
Page 485 and 486: years of ageOther Childhood Outcome
Page 487 and 488: Risk of biasRelevanceOther comments
Page 489 and 490: Reference Haggarty 2009Dietary patt
Page 491 and 492: Reference Kwan 2009Food typeSugar (
Page 493 and 494: Reference Lenders 1996Food groupssu
Page 495 and 496: Reference Olafsdottir 2006Dietary p
Page 497 and 498: ReferenceFood typeStudy typeLevel o
Page 499 and 500: Reference Stuebe 2009Dietary patter
Page 501 and 502: Included StudiesVegetablesVegetable
Page 503 and 504: Evidence StatementsMaternal Outcome
Page 505 and 506: 15. In a German cohort study:Allerg
Page 507 and 508: 29. In one Australian cohort study
Page 509 and 510: RelevanceOther commentseducation, c
Page 511 and 512: Reference George 2005Food typeVeget
Page 513 and 514: Reference Giordano 2008Food typeVeg
Page 515 and 516: Reference Herrick 2003Food groupsVe
Page 517 and 518: Reference Jones 2000 (see also Yin
Page 519 and 520: Reference Kwan 2009Food typeVegetab
Page 521 and 522: Reference Lamb 2008Dietary patterns
Page 523 and 524:
Reference Li 2009Dietary patterns V
Page 525 and 526:
Page 527 and 528:
Reference Miyake 2010Food typeFruit
Page 529 and 530:
Reference Oien 2010Food typeVegetab
Page 531 and 532:
Reference Pierik 2004Food typeVeget
Page 533 and 534:
Q3 332 (15%) 94 (16%) 0.9 (0.8 to 1
Page 535 and 536:
Reference Ramon 2009Food typeVegeta
Page 537 and 538:
Page 539 and 540:
Reference Willers 2007Food typeVege
Page 541 and 542:
Page 543 and 544:
RelevanceOther commentsLikely to be
Page 545 and 546:
Mitchell EA, Robinson E, Clark PM,
Page 547 and 548:
ReferencesNarrative review1. Jackso
Page 549 and 550:
29. Brion MJ, Leary SD, Smith GD, M
Page 551 and 552:
59. Scholl TO, Chen X, Khoo CS and
Page 553 and 554:
87. Olafsdottir AS, Magnusardottir
Page 555:
Excluded Studies555
show all

Literature Review: Pregnant and breastfeeding ... - Eat For Health

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?