FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1 (<strong>18</strong> JANUARY <strong>2007</strong>)action allowed, if it really existed. The committer who undertookthe action or acting or not acting in the real delusion is not guiltyfor the committed crime, but if he came in delusion by theneglect, then he is guilty only if the <strong>law</strong> specifically determines thepunishment for the consequence causing by the neglect.The legal delusion 28 (eror iuris) is the delusion about the crimeprohibition respectively about the prohibition of the committedcrime by the norms of the positive <strong>law</strong>. The action prohibition hasa wider character than the crime determination in the criminal<strong>law</strong>. That way understood legal delusion represents the wrongidea about the legal significance of the crime. According to that,the crime committer is in the legal delusion if with the validreasons didn’t know that his action is prohibited (article of 29Criminal code).Here the committer is aware of all the circumstances that makethe characteristics of the committing crime, but he is not awarethat such action is the crime. The person who didn’t know, norcould have known, nor was obliged to know that his action isforbidden (the irremovable legal delusion) is not guilty for thecaused consequence 29 . But, if such person was in legal delusion,but was obliged and could have known about the prohibition ofhis action (the removable legal delusion), then he is punishedwith the punishment prescribed by the <strong>law</strong>, but can be punishedeven with the smoother punishment 30 .28This base of the exclusion of the guilty prescribes in modern criminal codes :article 122-3 of the French Criminal code, article 31 of the Greek Criminal code,article 24 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Poland, article 14 of the SpainCriminal code and article 19 of the Criminal code of the Republic of Montenegro29D. Jovašević, O pravnoj zabludi u krivičnom pravu, Glasnik AK Vojvodine,Novi Sad, No. 9/1997. p.311-32730M.Cremona, Criminal <strong>law</strong>, London, 1989. p.219-223140PROF. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ PHD - THE GUILT IN THE NEWCRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1 (<strong>18</strong> JANUARY <strong>2007</strong>)BASIC LITERATUREČejović B., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Službeni list SRJ,Beograd, 2002.Đorđević M., Đorđević Đ., Krivično pravo, Projuris, Beograd,2005.Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Međunarodno krivično pravo,Nomos, Beograd, 2003.Đurđić V., Jovašević D., Praktikum za krivično pravo, Knjiga prva, Opšti deo, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2003.Jovanović Lj., Jovašević D., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo,Nomos, Beograd, 2002.Jovašević D., Komentar Krivičnog zakona SR Jugoslavije,Službeni glasnik, Beograd,2002.Jovašević D., Komentar Krivičnog zakona RepublikeSrbije, Nomos, Beograd, 2003.Jovašević D., Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije sauvodnim komentarom, Službeni list SCG, Beograd, 2006.Jovašević D., Zakon o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija sauvodnim komentarom, Službeni list SCG, Beograd, 2006.Jovašević D., Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Nomos, Beograd,2006.Jovašević D., Leksikon krivičnog prava, Službeni glasnik,Beograd, 2006.Lazarević Lj., Vučković B., Vučković V., Komentar KrivičnogRepublike Crne Gore, Obod,Cetinje, 2004.141PROF. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ PHD - THE GUILT IN THE NEWCRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
- Page 1 and 2:
FREE LAW JOURNAL!VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1
- Page 3 and 4:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 5 and 6:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 7 and 8:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 9 and 10:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 11 and 12:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 13 and 14:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 15 and 16:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 17 and 18:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 19 and 20:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 21 and 22:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 23 and 24:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 25 and 26:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 27 and 28:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 29 and 30:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 31 and 32:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 33 and 34:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 35 and 36:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 37 and 38:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 39 and 40:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 41 and 42:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 43 and 44:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 45 and 46:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 47 and 48:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 49 and 50:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 51 and 52:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 53 and 54:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 55 and 56:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 57 and 58:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 59 and 60:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 61 and 62:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 63 and 64:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 65 and 66:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 67 and 68:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 69 and 70:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 71 and 72:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 73 and 74:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 75 and 76:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 77 and 78:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 79 and 80:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 81 and 82:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 83 and 84:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 85 and 86:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 87 and 88:
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 89 and 90: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 91 and 92: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 93 and 94: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 95 and 96: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 97 and 98: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 99 and 100: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 101 and 102: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 103 and 104: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 105 and 106: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 107 and 108: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 109 and 110: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 111 and 112: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 113 and 114: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 115 and 116: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 117 and 118: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 119 and 120: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 121 and 122: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 123 and 124: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 125 and 126: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 127 and 128: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 129 and 130: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 131 and 132: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 133 and 134: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 135 and 136: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 137 and 138: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER
- Page 139: FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 3, NUMBER