E-International Scientific Research JournalISSN: 2094-1749 Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 2010ResultsTable 3 shows <strong>the</strong> mean volume of wastes produced by <strong>the</strong> barangays over a seven-dayobservation period classified by type and by disposal method. Note that <strong>the</strong>re were someuncertainties noted as to <strong>the</strong> responses of <strong>the</strong> key informants with respect to <strong>the</strong> waste disposalpractices. The researchers triangulated <strong>the</strong> responses by asking at least two o<strong>the</strong>r members of<strong>the</strong> households (independently of <strong>the</strong> main informant). If two of <strong>the</strong> three informants agreed on<strong>the</strong> manner in which <strong>the</strong>ir garbage are disposed, <strong>the</strong>n that particular waste disposal practice isnoted in <strong>the</strong> table below. The two o<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong> household interviewed were those whowere less likely to lie (i.e. no motive to lie).Table 3: Volume of Wastes by Type of WastesSource Description MeanVolumePer DayWood/Paper/YardTrimmings/TextilesBiodegradables/Common TrashCombustionNon-CombustionCombustionNon-Combustion20185083StandardError of<strong>the</strong> Mean3.502.005.252.50RemarksUncertainties inresponses maybe present-Plastics/Styrofoams/RubberCombustionNon-Combustion5331.254.50-Aluminum/Steel/Tin/Copper/Cans/BottlesCombustionNon-Combustion03806.70 -Batteries/Old Machines Combustion 10 2.50 -Non-CombustionTable 4 shows <strong>the</strong> net GHG output based on <strong>the</strong> average daily output of each type ofwaste and each type of waste disposal (combustion and non-combustion):Table 4: Total GHG Ouput Per Type of Waste/GarbageWaste CO 2GramsMethaneGramsNitreousoxideGramsWood/Paper/Yard Trimmings/Textiles 29260 2.44 0.94Biodegradables/Common Trash 89820 19.11 14.79Plastics/Styrofoams/Rubber 1000 2500 500Aluminum/Steel/Tin/Copper/Cans/Bottles 0 0 0Batteries/Old Machines 0 0 0TOTAL 120080 2521.55 515.73312
E-International Scientific Research JournalISSN: 2094-1749 Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 2010DiscussionsThe average daily GHG emissions from <strong>the</strong> barangays show an output of about 120 kgof CO2, 2.52 kg of methane and 0.515 kg of nitreous oxide per day. Over a regular one-yearperiod <strong>the</strong>se translate to : 43.80 kilo-tons of CO2, 0.92 kilo-ton of methane and 0.20 kilo-ton ofnitreous oxide just for <strong>the</strong> nine barangays of Dapitan City. We can extrapolate on <strong>the</strong> figures ifwe consider <strong>the</strong> entire city and its designated landfill area. The figures could easily inflate by afactor of 10 i.e. roughly 438 kilo-tons of CO2, 25.2 kilo-tons of methane and 5.15 kilo-tons ofnitreous oxide. With <strong>the</strong> growing population of <strong>the</strong> City (estimated at roughly 2.6% perannum), <strong>the</strong> corresponding volume of garbage and wastes will double within <strong>the</strong> next 15 yearsand, hence, so will <strong>the</strong> emission of harmful GH gases into <strong>the</strong> atmosp<strong>here</strong>.However, much of this volume of GH gases can be attributed to <strong>the</strong> poor wastemanagement practices of <strong>the</strong> households in <strong>the</strong> barangays. For instance, if open burning isstrictly prohibited, <strong>the</strong> average daily GH emissions can be reduced by as much as 25% andwith o<strong>the</strong>r mitigating practices such as closed composting and waste segregation, <strong>the</strong> GHemissions can be fur<strong>the</strong>r reduced to 50% of its current levels. Stricter implementation ofordinances and laws governing waste management and disposal needs to be observed if <strong>the</strong>situation is to be arrested within <strong>the</strong> next few years.One possible reason for <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r loose implementation and ad<strong>here</strong>nce of people toproper waste management ordinances is <strong>the</strong>ir lack of understanding and appreciation of <strong>the</strong>selaws. For instance, <strong>the</strong> harmful gases emitted from ei<strong>the</strong>r natural process or by burning <strong>the</strong>wastes are not seen as harmful by <strong>the</strong> ordinary citizen. In fact, in <strong>the</strong> old belief and tradition,burning of such wastes is considered a good practice for driving away mosquitoes. Drivingaway harmful mosquitoes for <strong>the</strong>m is a far more urgent matter than lessening <strong>the</strong> release ofharmful greenhouse gases into <strong>the</strong> atmosp<strong>here</strong>. The issue really boils down to satisfying apresent need (protecting ones health) versus mitigating a slow, gradual and largely unnoticedclimate change. For this reason, an effective educational intervention program will have to becrafted simultaneously focusing on (a.) addressing <strong>the</strong>ir health concerns such as driving awaymosquitoes and bugs, and (b.) <strong>the</strong> harmful effects of greenhouse gases to <strong>the</strong> ozone layer. If<strong>the</strong>se issues are clarified and well-understood by <strong>the</strong> citizens of <strong>the</strong> City, <strong>the</strong>n compliance to<strong>the</strong> waste management ordinances will be greatly enhanced.The greenhouse gas contribution of open dumping of iron, steel, old machines andbatteries could not be quantified in <strong>the</strong> present study since no conversion factors are availablein <strong>the</strong> literature. However, we suspect that <strong>the</strong>se waste materials deteriorate over time throughnatural processes and also give off a significant amount of harmful greenhouse gases in <strong>the</strong>atmosp<strong>here</strong> knowing that iron and o<strong>the</strong>r such metals react with free oxygen and nitrogen in <strong>the</strong>atmosp<strong>here</strong>. This, of course, will be a matter for <strong>the</strong> chemists and environmentalists to dealwith in future studies. We none<strong>the</strong>less wish to stress <strong>the</strong> urgency of such a quantificationprocedure since more and more of this type of waste products are being produced at <strong>the</strong>household level e.g. discarded cellular phones, radio batteries, and o<strong>the</strong>rs.Finally, more than 95% of <strong>the</strong> greenhouse gas emissions from <strong>the</strong> household wastes iscarbon dioxide (CO2). This gas is naturally needed by plants for <strong>the</strong>ir photosyn<strong>the</strong>tic processeswith oxygen as a by-product. Thus, if more plants and trees were planted in <strong>the</strong> backyards of<strong>the</strong>se households, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> amount of CO2 directly released to <strong>the</strong> atmosp<strong>here</strong> could be fur<strong>the</strong>rreduced. Perhaps, this can be implemented as part of <strong>the</strong> waste management protocols that willbe crafted by <strong>the</strong> City Officials.313