13.07.2015 Views

download the full article here - EISRJC

download the full article here - EISRJC

download the full article here - EISRJC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E-International Scientific Research JournalISSN: 2094-1749 Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 2010Species diversity was determined using <strong>the</strong> Shannon index of diversity and speciesrichness.ResultsColiform Contamination. Water samples from all seven stations in both samplingswere positive for total coliform (Table 1). In 2006, Stations 5 (Banonong) and 2 (Linabo) had<strong>the</strong> highest counts of Salmonella sp, with counts of 7.75 colonies x 10 3 100 ml -1 (±0.250) and7.1667 colonies x 10 3 100 ml -1 (± 0.347 ), respectively. The former station recorded evenhigher count (TNTC, too numerous to count) in <strong>the</strong> 2010 sampling, along with station 4(Ambogoc). Linabo recorded <strong>the</strong> second highest followed by Cawa-cawa and Polo. Esherichiacoli colonies were also too numerous to count in both stations on <strong>the</strong> same sampling period. In<strong>the</strong> 2006 sampling, <strong>the</strong> fecal coliform was highest in Ambogoc( 2.0 colonies x 10 3 100 ml -1 ±0.304) followed by Linabo (1.917 colonies x 10 3 100 ml -1 ± 0.344). These values were smallercompared to <strong>the</strong> counts obtained in November 1999 (Table 1) except for <strong>the</strong> TNTC readingsfor Salmonella sp. in Ambogoc and Banonong during <strong>the</strong> last sampling. Salmonella countsduring <strong>the</strong> 2010 sampling was significantly higher compared to <strong>the</strong> 2006 sampling but wascomparable to <strong>the</strong> 1999 sampling of SUAKCREM [F(2,17)= 4.156, p=0.034].Plankton Community. The plankton community in Liboran River were categorizedinto diatoms dinoflagellates and zooplankton (Fig. 3). As shown, <strong>the</strong> latter comprised 50% and46% of <strong>the</strong> total community in 2006 and 2010, respectively. The diatoms made up <strong>the</strong> 29%in both sampling periods while <strong>the</strong> dinoflagellates comprised <strong>the</strong> 21% (2006) and 25%(2010). Species composition and estimated population densities of plankton in Liboran Riverare presented in Tables 2 and 3.In 2006, <strong>the</strong> diatoms were composed of fifty-seven species with five dominant genera:Coscinodiscus, Navicula, Gyrosigma, Chaetoceros and Amphiprora. The blue-green alga,Oscillatoria was also abundant Table 2. A total of fourteen species of dinoflagellates wereidentified belonging to 11 genera. Three of <strong>the</strong>se genera, Dinophysis, Ceratium andPeridinium are known to cause red tides. The first two genera dominated <strong>the</strong> dinoflagellatecommunity. Dinophysis has also toxin-producing species. Zooplankton was made up of 21species typically dominated by crustaceans particularly, <strong>the</strong> copepods. In 2010, <strong>the</strong>re wereonly 44 species of diatoms, 14 dinoflagellates and 11 zooplankton species identified. Withregard to <strong>the</strong> diversity of <strong>the</strong> plankton community, richness and Shannon diversity indices were2.54 ±0.340 and 1.12 ±0.069, respectively in 2010 and 2.84 ±0.34 and 1.20 ± 0.10 in 2006.Table 1. Comparison of mean total coliform, Escherichia coli and Salmonellatyphymurium counts (colonies 100 ml -1 )with <strong>the</strong> study conducted bySUAKCREM in 1999.StationsSUAKCREM, 1999Colonies 100This studycolonies 100 ml -1 Colonies 100 -120102006Salmonella E. coli Salmonella E.coli Salmonella E. colisp.spsp369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!